Comparison of Tazarotene and Minocycline Therapies for Maintenance of Facial Acne Vulgaris

December 14, 2005 updated by: KGL, Inc.

Regimen of Tazorac .1% Gel & Minocycline Cap in Tx of Individuals w/Acne Vulgaris: Effects of Maintenance Therapy on Duration of Improvement of Tazorac .1% Gel Used in Conjunction w/Placebo Cap Compared w/Minocycline Cap Used in Conjunction w/Either Tazorac .1% Gel or Vehicle Gel

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of three maintenance regimens (topical tazarotene, oral minocycline, or both) in sustaining improvement in acne.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

For many years antibiotic therapy has been the backbone of therapy for inflammatory acne. However, topical retinoids also offer efficacy against inflammatory acne and the combination of a topical retinoid and an antibiotic can result in faster and more complete clearing of inflammatory lesions than either drug alone.

The reduced sensitivity of Propionibacterium acnes to antibiotics is a growing problem. Resistance is a major issue not only because it can result in treatment failure but also because of concerns that it may potentially be transferred to other bacteria that anti-acne antibiotics are used used against. One of the most important factors predisposing to the development of resistant strains of propionibacterium acnes is the prolonged use of antibiotics. Therefore, in order to help minimize the development for such resistance, it is evident that maintenance strategies for acne should aim to minimize the long-term use of antibiotics.

Topical retinoids are a rational choice for maintenance therapy due to their activity on microcomedones (the precursor for all acne lesions). Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data evaluating this use in a maintenance setting. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with moderate to severe inflammatory acne who have achieved a good level of clearance (eg>/= 75%) can maintain the improvement in their acne using maintenance therapy. THe study compared the efficacy of three maintenance therapies (topical tazarotene, oral minocycline, and topical tazarotene plus oral minocycline) in sustaining the clinical improvement attained after initial topical tazarotene plus oral minocycline therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

189

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Broomall, Pennsylvania, United States, 19008
        • KGL, Inc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Moderate facial acne vulgaris 25-60 facial inflammatory acne lesions 10-100 facial comedos No more than 2 facial nodular cystic lesions (no more than 5 mm in diameter) For females of child bearing potential, a regular menstrual cycle Negative urine pregnancy test

Exclusion Criteria:

Uncontrolled systemic disease Acne vulgaris known to be resistant to antibiotics For females: pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy Use of estrogens or birth control pills for 12 weeks or less Any skin disease that may interfere with diagnosis or evaluation of acne vulgaris Known hypersensivity to any components in Tazarac gel or to any tetracyclines Use of any systemic retinoids in past 2 years Use of any systemic antibiotics, or participation in another drug or investigational study, in past 30 days Use of topical anti-acne medication in past 14 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Global improvement from baseline at week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Lesion counts at weeks 16, 20 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

KGL, Inc.

Collaborators

NYU Langone Health
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Allergan
State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center
Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Leyden, MD, KGL, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2002

Study Completion

August 1, 2002

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2005

Last Verified

September 1, 2005

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • T214

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe