Th1, Th2 and Monokine Responses as Risk Factors of Renal Transplant Rejection

May 8, 2007 updated by: University of Giessen

Role of Th1, Th2 and Monokine Responses as Risk Factors of Acute and Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection - Impact of Different Immunosuppressive Protocols

Chronic transplant rejection remains the main cause of late kidney graft loss. We showed previously that patients with pretransplant CD4 helper defects and low in-vitro IL-10 responses demonstrated an extremely low risk of acute rejection and a significantly better 1- and 3-year graft function whereas pretransplant Th1 responses were not predictive (Weimer R et al. 1996 and 1998). In liver transplant recipients, we found CD4 helper function and in-vitro IL-10 responses significantly decreased compared to CsA-treated patients (Zipperle et al. 1997). If the same effect will be demonstrated in renal transplant recipients, Tacrolimus (Tacr) treatment might result in enhanced graft survival compared to CsA, when CD4 helper function and in-vitro IL-10 responses of the individual patient are elevated. Other studies of our group suggest a beneficial role of enhanced T-suppressor activity and of an IL-6 independent B cell/monocyte defect in the maintenance of long-term stable graft function, whereas enhanced monokine secretion (TNF-a, GM-CSF, IL-6) was found in chronic rejection (Weimer et al. 1990, 1992, 1994, 1998).

In the current randomized prospective study we will analyze the impact of CsA versus Tacr and of MMF versus azathioprine on Th1, Th2 and monokine responses and their predictive value regarding occurrence of acute and chronic rejection. With a proposed follow-up of 5 years this study might enable a patient-tailored immunosuppressive therapy resulting in prolonged graft survival.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic transplant rejection remains the main cause of late kidney graft loss. We showed previously that patients with pretransplant CD4 helper defects and low in-vitro IL-10 responses demonstrated an extremely low risk of acute rejection and a significantly better 1- and 3-year graft function whereas pretransplant Th1 responses were not predictive (Weimer R et al. 1996 and 1998). In liver transplant recipients, we found CD4 helper function and in-vitro IL-10 responses significantly decreased compared to CsA-treated patients (Zipperle et al. 1997). If the same effect will be demonstrated in renal transplant recipients, Tacrolimus (Tacr) treatment might result in enhanced graft survival compared to CsA, when CD4 helper function and in-vitro IL-10 responses of the individual patient are elevated. Other studies of our group suggest a beneficial role of enhanced T-suppressor activity and of an IL-6 independent B cell/monocyte defect in the maintenance of long-term stable graft function, whereas enhanced monokine secretion (TNF-a, GM-CSF, IL-6) was found in chronic rejection (Weimer et al. 1990, 1992, 1994, 1998).

In the current randomized prospective study we will analyze the impact of CsA versus Tacr and of MMF versus azathioprine (Aza; 3 treatment groups: CsA/Aza, CsA/MMF and Tacr/Aza; steroid and prophylactic ATG treatment according to the Giessen protocol) on immune parameters and their predictive value regarding occurrence of acute and chronic rejection. As immune parameters we will assess CD4 helper function, in-vitro IL-4 and IL-10 responses of T cells and CD4+ T cells, respectively, in allogeneic cocultures of patient T cells with control B cells and in PHA-stimulated T cell cultures, T-cell dependent (PWM-stimulated allogeneic cocultures) and T-independent (SAC I-stimulated B cell cultures) immunoglobulin-secreting cell (ISC) responses, B-cell IL-6 and IL-10 responses and monokine responses (LPS-stimulated monocyte cultures) pretransplant, and 4 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years posttransplant. Serum cytokines and easily measurable parameters as neopterin, sIL-1RA and sCD30 will be assessed at the same time points. The same is true for flow cytometric analysis of cytokine receptor, adhesion molecule, costimulator molecule and surface molecule expression, respectively, which play an important role in cell-cell interactions and tolerance induction. Cytokine promoter gene polymorphisms will be determined to potentially enable pretransplant risk estimation. To establish a broadly available and rapid diagnostic method, we will compare the data of intracellular cytokine testing with the results of the much more difficult and time consuming coculture analyses used in our previous studies.

With a proposed follow-up of 5 years this prospective randomized study might enable a patient-tailored immunosuppressive therapy resulting in better graft function and prolonged graft survival by preventing chronic allograft rejection.

Weimer R, Pomer S, Staehler G, Opelz G. Increased T suppressor activity in renal transplant recipients with long-term stable graft function. Clinical Transplantation 1990; 4: 280-286

Weimer R, Zipperle S, Daniel V, Pomer S, Staehler G, Opelz G. In vitro B cell response in long-term renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1992; 24(6): 2537-2538

Weimer R, Zipperle S, Daniel V, Pomer S, Staehler G, Opelz G. IL-6 independent monocyte/B cell defect in renal transplant recipients with long-term stable graft function. Transplantation 1994; 57(1): 54-59

Weimer R, Zipperle S, Daniel V, Carl S, Staehler G, Opelz G. Pretransplant CD4 helper function and IL-10 response predict risk of acute kidney graft rejection. Transplantation 1996; 62(11): 1606-1614

Zipperle S, Weimer R, Golling M, Daniel V, Otto G, Opelz G. Impaired T cell IL-10 secretion and CD4 helper function in liver transplant patients treated with tacrolimus. Transplant Proc 1997; 29(1-2): 1079-1080

Weimer R, Zipperle S, Daniel V, Carl S, Staehler G, Opelz G. Superior 3-year kidney graft function in patients with impaired pretransplant Th2 responses. Transplant Int 1998; 11 (Suppl 1): 350-356

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Giessen, Germany, D-35392
        • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Giessen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Renal transplant recipients in the Giessen renal transplant unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications against blood-taking (anemia with hemoglobin<9.5 g/l, hypotension etc.)
  • No informed consent by the patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Defined Population
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Giessen

Collaborators

Novartis
Hoffmann-La Roche
Astellas Pharma Inc
Heidelberg University
Fresenius AG
Biotest

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rolf Weimer, Prof. Dr., Department of Internal Medicine, University of Giessen, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 1998

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 10, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2007

Last Verified

May 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NTx-prosp-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Failure, Chronic

Clinical Trials on tacrolimus

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Finland

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe