Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients

October 8, 2018 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Extension Study to the Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study CRAD001H2304 to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipient

The reason for this extension is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of two concentration-controlled everolimus regimen in de novo liver transplant recipients. The most important long-term safety assessments include evaluation of renal function, progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis, and other treatment related effects at Month 36 post-transplantation compared to extension baseline (Months 24 post-transplantation).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

284

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1118AAT
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1107BEA
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Australia
      • Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia, 5041
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Victoria
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 21041-030
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90020-090
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bogota, Colombia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Valle Del Cauca
      • Cali, Valle Del Cauca, Colombia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Czech Republic
      • Praha 4, Czech Republic, Czechia, 140 21
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33076
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Clichy, France, 92110
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Creteil, France, 94010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Villejuif, France, 94805
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Bavaria
      • Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany, 93053
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dublin 4, Ireland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • MI
      • Milano, MI, Italy, 20162
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • MO
      • Modena, MO, Italy, 41124
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • PI
      • Pisa, PI, Italy, 56124
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • RM
      • Roma, RM, Italy, 00161
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • TO
      • Torino, TO, Italy, 10126
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CE
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 123182
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 129010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Barcelona
      • Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Catalunya
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08035
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08036
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Comunidad Valenciana
      • Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46026
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Vizcaya
      • Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain, 48903
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 141 86
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007-2197
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07101
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-2400
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Ability and willingness to adhere to study regimen
  • Completed core study with assigned regimen;

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study:

  • Severe hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia.
  • Low platelet count.
  • Low white blood cell count.
  • Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Systemic infection requiring active use of IV antibiotics.
  • Patients in a critical care setting.
  • Use of prohibited medication.
  • Use of immunosuppressive agents not utilized in the protocol.
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or similar drugs.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Women of child-bearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus
Participants were maintained on whole blood trough levels of 3 - 8 ng/mL everolimus and 3 - 5 ng/mL tacrolimus.
After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization, a level which was maintained for the duration of the study.
Other Names:
  • Protopic
  • FK-506,
  • fujimycin,
  • Prograf,
  • Advagraf,
Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL for the duration of the study.
Other Names:
  • Afinitor
  • RAD001,
  • Zortress,
  • Certican,
For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6. The corticosteroids were not specified in the protocol because they were adminsitered to the participants according to local practice as part of standard of care.
EXPERIMENTAL: Tacrolimus elimination
Participants were maintained on a whole blood trough level of 6 - 10 ng/mL everolimus.
After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization. Tacrolimus elimination was started beginning at Month 4. Tacrolimus was tapered after everolimus whole blood trough levels were within the target range of 6-10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was completely eliminated by the end of Month 4.
Other Names:
  • Protopic
  • FK-506,
  • fujimycin,
  • Prograf,
  • Advagraf,
Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL until Month 4; beginning with Month 4, the dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 6-10 ng/mL.
Other Names:
  • Afinitor
  • RAD001,
  • Zortress,
  • Certican,
For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6. The corticosteroids were not specified in the protocol because they were adminsitered to the participants according to local practice as part of standard of care.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Tacrolimus control
Participants were maintained on a whole blood trough level of 6 - 10 ng/mL tacrolimus.
Tacrolimus trough levels were targeted to be maintained at 8-12 ng/mL until Month 4. At Month 4, tacrolimus whole blood trough levels were decreased to a target trough level of 6-10 ng/mL for the remainder of the study.
Other Names:
  • Protopic
  • FK-506,
  • fujimycin,
  • Prograf,
  • Advagraf,
For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6. The corticosteroids were not specified in the protocol because they were adminsitered to the participants according to local practice as part of standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
Time Frame: from months 24 to 36
The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
from months 24 to 36
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
Time Frame: from months 36 to 48
The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
from months 36 to 48
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
Time Frame: from months 24 to 36
The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
from months 24 to 36
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
Time Frame: from months 36 - 48
The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
from months 36 - 48
Change in Renal Function
Time Frame: from months 24 to 36
Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1.
from months 24 to 36

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence Rate of tBPAR
Time Frame: from months 24 - 36
The number of participants who had a tBPAR was analyzed. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection.
from months 24 - 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transplant Recipient

Clinical Trials on Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus)

Subscribe