Building Blocks for Child and Family Well-being (BBFW)

January 9, 2026 updated by: Heather Prime, York University

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Program Evaluation of A Parent Group to Support Child and Family Well-being

Background. Understanding emotions, stress, and conflicts within the family context is critical for promoting positive change. However, most support services for families often address child development, parenting, couple relationships separately without considering these as interacting systems that contributes to overall family well-being. This project is to evaluate an existing clinical service in York University Psychology Clinic (YUPC), "Building Blocks for Child and Family Well-being" (BBFW), which provides an integrated understanding of the family context, and equips caregivers with tools to help families connect, problem-solve, cope with stress, and thrive. BBFW is a brief virtual program that promotes experiential learning, provides individually tailored strategies, and builds a community of support for caregivers. The current study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the BBFW program within the York University Psychology Clinic (YUPC), with four objectives:

  1. Evaluating the feasibility of implementing the BBWF program into YUPC clinical services, represented by enrolment rates, sample characteristics, retention (i.e., number of sessions attended, % dropout), adherence (i.e., completing in- and out-of-session activities), as well as the acceptability of the program among participants.
  2. Examining sample and clinical characteristics of those attending the BBFW service
  3. Exploring the effectiveness of the BBFW program through changes in family functioning and meta-emotion philosophy from pre- to post-intervention, as well as changes at 1- and 3-month follow-ups.
  4. Evaluating and refining the program quality using participant quantitative and qualitative feedback.

The BBFW program is based on the best evidence from developmental, family, and relationship science. It aims to support family mental health and well-being through a holistic and sustainable approach, viewing the family as a set of multiple, interdependent systems. This program provides a brief, cost-effective, and accessible alternative with the potential to reduce the burden on traditional mental health and support services for Canadian families.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Heather Prime, PhD
  • Phone Number: 416-736-5117
  • Email: hprime@yorku.ca

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Truong Phuong Anh Nguyen, BA
  • Phone Number: 647-892-5519
  • Email: anhtpng@yorku.ca

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3
        • Not yet recruiting
        • York University,
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gillian Shoychet, MA
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Truong Phuong Anh Nguyen, BA
          • Phone Number: 647-892-5519
          • Email: anhtpng@yorku.ca
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Madison Aitken, PhD
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • York University Psychology Clinic
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers aged 18 years or older participating in the BBFW program at York Univeristy's Psychology Clinic in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Caregivers with children 18 years old or under are eligible to participate in the BBFW program.
  • Caregivers must be residing in Ontario at the time of their service.
  • Caregivers must also have access to a digital device with a screen (e.g., phone, tablet, computer) that can be used for virtual services.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers who do not consent to participate in research.
  • Caregivers whose children are older than 18 years old.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Parent Skills Group Program
Caregivers who take part in a 6-week group program on parenting skills
BBFW is a 6-week brief virtual program that promotes experiential learning, provides individually tailored strategies, and builds a community of support for caregivers. The program provides an integrated understanding of the family context, and equips caregivers with tools to help families connect, problem-solve, cope with stress, and thrive. The following topics are covered over 6 weeks: Introduction to the model; Getting to Know Your Family Members (e.g., temperament); Supporting Child Emotions; Promoting Positive Behaviours; Limit-Setting and Sibling Dynamics; Parenting Teams and Wrap-Up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants Enrolled Per month
Time Frame: Week 0
Number of participants enrolled per month.
Week 0
Geographic Reach
Time Frame: Week 0
Cities/towns in Ontario families accessing the program reside. Data will be collected through the demographic questionnaire administered at baseline.
Week 0
Retention
Time Frame: Week 0 to Week 18
The percentage of participants who remain in study until the end of the follow up session.
Week 0 to Week 18
Adherence
Time Frame: Week 1 to Week 6
Number of sessions attended.
Week 1 to Week 6
Adherence
Time Frame: Week 6
Completion rate of in session activities.
Week 6
Child Age Groups
Time Frame: Week 0
Mean age of child of the parent who is seeking service. Data will be collected through the demographic questionnaire administered at baseline.
Week 0
Primary Presenting Concern
Time Frame: Week 0
Primary presenting concern of parent who is seeking service, collected at baseline using demographic questionnaire. Options include: child emotion regulation; child behavioural problems; challenging siblings dynamics; challenging co-parenting dynamics (working as a team with second parent); family stress, chaos, and/or conflict; other [please specify].
Week 0
Family Clinical Characteristics
Time Frame: Week 2
Family Clinical Characteristics include parent relationship dimension. The Relationship Dimension Scale (Lafrance, Henderson, & Mayman, 2020) is a 14-item tool for parents to reflect on different aspect of their relationships with their child/children. This is a qualitative measure that will be examined for themes arising in participating caregivers.
Week 2
Family Clinical Characteristics
Time Frame: Week 1
Family Clinical Characteristics include parent stress. The Family Stress Checklist includes 35 items which measures a parent's level of stress in 7 areas (i.e., financial, professional, physical, relational, environmental, child, parenting, discrimination). Each item is rated on a 5-item scale. Mean of items in each area will be calculated, with minimum score=1, maximum score=5. Higher scores correspond to higher level of stress in each area.
Week 1
Client Satisfaction
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6
Client Satisfaction will be measured using surveys and participant qualitative feedback. A brief satisfaction survey will be administered weekly at the end of each group session. This survey consists of 4 questions about the content, facilitation, group activities/discussion, as well as an open-ended question for general feedback about the session. In the end, participant will be asked to complete another satisfaction survey about the program overall. Means of the survey items will be calculated. Minimum score=1, maximum score=4. Higher scores correspond to higher satisfaction.
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6
Client Acceptability
Time Frame: Week 6
Percentage of participants reporting at least 'good' on 80 % or more indicators on an Implementation Acceptability Scale that will assess attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and ethicality. Minimum score=7, maximum score=35. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes.
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-Post Change in Parent Reported Family Functioning
Time Frame: Changes from Week 0 to Week 6; from Week 0 to Week 10; from Week 0 to Week 18
Changes in Family Functioning will be assessed using the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD; Epstein et al., 1983). The scale has 60 items representing 7 subscales: Problem Solving, Communication, Roles, Affective Responsiveness, Affective Involvement, Behavior Control, General Functioning. Each item is rated on 4 point scale. Mean of each subscale will be calculated. For each subscale, minimum score=1, maximum score=4. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes (i.e., less healthy family functioning).
Changes from Week 0 to Week 6; from Week 0 to Week 10; from Week 0 to Week 18
Pre-Post Change in Parent Meta-Emotion Philosophy
Time Frame: Changes from Week 0 to Week 6; from Week 0 to Week 10; from Week 0 to Week 18

Changes in Parent Meta-Emotion Philosophy will be assessed using the Emotion-Related Parenting Styles Scale-Short Form (ERPS-SF; Paterson et al., 2012).

The scale has 20 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert Scale. Mean of items representing 4 parenting styles will be calculated. For each parenting style, minimum score=1, maximum score=5. The style with highest average score indicates the participant's emotion-related parenting style.

Changes from Week 0 to Week 6; from Week 0 to Week 10; from Week 0 to Week 18

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather Prime, PhD, York University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parenting Skills

Clinical Trials on Building Blocks for Family Well-being

Subscribe