Open Label Study to Evaluate Effect, Safety and Tolerability of Betaferon Standard Dose of 250µg in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis

September 29, 2015 updated by: Bayer

Open Label Study to Evaluate the Effect, Safety and Tolerability of 250µg (8 MIU) Interferon Beta 1b (Betaferon) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day (for 24 Weeks) in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis

The purpose of this study is to determine if the study drug is effective and safe in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients of Chinese origin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany.

Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany is the sponsor of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100050
      • Beijing, China, 100730
      • Shanghai, China, 200040

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese origin
  • diagnosis of Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any disease other than Multiple Sclerosis (MS) that could better explain the patients signs and symptoms
  • HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infections
  • Hepatitis A
  • Syphilis
  • immunodeficiency
  • rheumatic disease or Sjogren syndrome
  • heart disease
  • severe depression
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • conditions interfering with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Gadolinium DTPA (Gadovist, contrast agent) allergy
  • allergy against human proteins, paracetamol, acetaminophen and ibuprofen intolerance
  • participation in other trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.)
Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
Time Frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
The primary efficacy variable was calculated by subtracting the number of newly active lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of newly active lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of newly active lesions per three months, new lesion frequency per 3 months)
after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference Between the Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New Gd-enhancing Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
Time Frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new Gd-enhancing lesions per three months)
after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
Difference Between the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
Time Frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to the 3-month pre-treatment
This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new T2 lesions per three months) based on non-enhancing lesions on T1 weighted scans
after 6 months of treatment as compared to the 3-month pre-treatment
Volume of Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of New Gadolinium (T1)-Enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of T2 Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Rate
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature more than (>) 37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. The relapse rate was calculated on an annualized basis. Annualized relapse rate is the average number of relapses in a year calculated by negative binomial regression as the sum of confirmed relapses of all subjects in the group divided by the sum of the number of days on study of all subjects in the group and multiplied by 365.25.
Baseline up to Week 24
Assessment of Relapses: Number of Relapses
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints, and same subjects were counted more than once under each category.
3 and 6 months
Assessment of Relapses: Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects After 24 Weeks
Time Frame: After 24 weeks
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment.
After 24 weeks
Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Severity
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. A major relapse was defined based on changes on EDSS with the following additional criteria to be met: objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS score or increase of the total EDSS score. Relapses which did not meet the criteria of major relapses were considered as non-major.
Baseline up to Week 24
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: Pre-treatment on Day 1, Week 24
The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability. The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability.
Pre-treatment on Day 1, Week 24
Percentage of Subjects Without EDSS Progression
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability.The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability. An EDSS progression was defined as increase in EDSS greater than or equal to (>=) 1.0 points (in the treatment period as compared to baseline).
Baseline up to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

3
Subscribe