Physical Activities in Daily Life After Lung Transplantation

February 18, 2011 updated by: KU Leuven

Effects of a 6-month Outpatient Rehabilitation Program Including Structured Exercise Training on Participation in Physical Activities in Daily Life in Lung Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study is to compare participation in physical activities in daily life and functional outcomes of lung transplant recipients attending a six-month multicomponent rehabilitation program including exercise training against others receiving only instructions on how to increase their participation in physical activities in daily life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At present it is not clear whether it is necessary for lung transplant recipients to participate in a rehabilitation program including structured exercise training. Observations from available studies suggest that exercise capacity and health status improve following transplantation but remain impaired when compared with values of age-matched reference groups. No differences were found between participants of rehabilitation programs and patients engaging in usual daily activities. One should be cautious however to draw definite conclusions from these findings since they rest solely on results of cross-sectional investigations or single group studies. No information on functional outcomes such as participation in physical activities in daily life is currently available in lung transplant recipients. In order to answer the question if it is necessary for lung transplant recipients to participate in an outpatient rehabilitation program including structured exercise training it is our purpose to conduct a randomized clinical trial to investigate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation after transplantation.

  • Interventions: Both groups will receive counseling to engage in regular physical activity. Patients in the intervention group will additionally follow a standardized outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for 6 months starting immediately after discharge from hospital.
  • Hypothesis: Our alternative hypothesis is that intensive post transplant rehabilitation does enhance improvements in functional status and participation in physical activities in daily life after transplantation.
  • Outcomes: Participation in physical activities in daily life will be the primary outcome. Physical component summary scale of the SF-36, exercise capacity and peripheral muscle function will be secondary outcomes. Outcomes will be assessed on discharge from the hospital and again three, six and twelve months after discharge.
  • Treatment failure: Patients in the control group receiving only counseling will be allowed to discontinue the assigned treatment and will receive respiratory rehabilitation including exercise training if functional outcomes do not improve or participation in physical activities in daily life does not increase within the first three months of the intervention period. The treatment groups will be compared both as randomized (according to intention to treat) and with crossover cases excluded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, B-3000
        • University Hospital Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of single or double lung transplants

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of multiple organ transplants
  • Patients scheduled for retransplantation
  • Patients not leaving hospital within 6 weeks after surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rehabilitation + Lifestyle Counseling
Multicomponent Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program including structured exercise training
Rehabilitation of at least 8 weeks, for at least twice/week. This group will also receive the exercise counseling as a part of the rehabilitation program.
Other Names:
  • Pulmonary Rehabilitation
  • Physical Activity Counseling
Active Comparator: Lifestyle Counseling
Six exercise counseling sessions will be carried out during a 6-month period. This group will only receive the counseling and no formal structured exercise training sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Participation in Physical Activities in Daily Life
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Health Status (SF-36)
Time Frame: One year
One year
Exercise Capacity
Time Frame: One year
One year
Peripheral Muscle Function
Time Frame: One year
One year
Psychological Functioning
Time Frame: One year
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Langer, MSc, KU-Leuven, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Study Chair: Rik Gosselink, PhD, KU-Leuven, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Study Chair: Thierry Troosters, PhD, KU-Leuven, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Study Chair: Marc Decramer, PhD, University Hospital Leuven, Respiratory Division
  • Study Chair: Geert Verleden, PhD, University Hospital Leuven, Respiratory Division
  • Study Chair: Lieven Dupont, PhD, University Hospital Leuven, Respiratory Division

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2011

Last Verified

February 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe