- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00407745
A 17-Week Trial To Assess Pregabalin For The Treatment Of Nerve Pain Due To Spinal Cord Injury
January 21, 2021 updated by: Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
A 17-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Trial Of Pregabalin For The Treatment Of Chronic Central Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if pregabalin relieves nerve pain associated with spinal cord injury compared to placebo (pill that contains no active medicine).
This study will also evaluate the safety of pregabalin in this patient population.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
220
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
V Region
-
Vina del Mar, V Region, Chile, 2520024
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100068
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Antioquia
-
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Brno, Czechia, 66250
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Liberec 1, Czechia, 46063
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Praha 5, Czechia, 15006
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
New Delhi, India, 110 070
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Andhra Pradesh
-
Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500 003
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560 034
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560 052
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 575002
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Uttar Pradesh
-
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, 226 018
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Chiba, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Tokushima, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Yamagata, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Aichi
-
Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Akita
-
Daisen, Akita, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Fukuoka
-
Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Hiroshima
-
Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Hokkaido
-
Bibai, Hokkaido, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Hyogo
-
Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Ibaraki
-
Sasima-gun, Ibaraki, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kumamoto
-
Kikuchi-gun, Kumamoto, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Miyagi
-
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Niigata
-
Kashiwazaki, Niigata, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Oita
-
Beppu, Oita, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Saitama
-
Hanyu, Saitama, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Kitamoto, Saitama, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Shizuoka
-
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Tochigi
-
Kanuma, Tochigi, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Tokyo
-
Kotoku, Tokyo, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Musashimurayama-shi, Tokyo, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Yamagata
-
Higashiokitama-gun, Yamagata, Japan
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Cebu City, Philippines
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Manila, Philippines
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Quezon City, Philippines, 1100
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Manila
-
Espana, Manila, Philippines, 1008
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 105203
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197706
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85050
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85027
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
California
-
Fresno, California, United States, 93710
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Napa, California, United States, 94558
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Northridge, California, United States, 91324
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46250
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kansas
-
Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
White Plains, New York, United States, 10605
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Bellevue, Ohio, United States, 44811
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Johnstown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15904
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
West Virginia
-
Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25304
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25301
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with nerve pain after Spinal cord injury (traumatic, diving, ischemic and after removal of benign tumors (except meningioma and fibromas)
- Pain has to be chronic(continuous for at least 3 months or intermittent for at least 6 months
- Pain score at least 4 in 4 of 7 days prior to receive treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregabalin use in the last 60 days, prior intolerance to pregabalin
- Creatinine clearance <60 mL/min.
- White blood cell count <2500/mm3; neutrophil count <1500/mm3; platelet count <100 x 103/ mm3.
- Abuse of drugs or alcohol
- Unstable medial conditions
- Clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG).
- Presence of severe pain associated with conditions other than spinal cord injury that could confound the assessment or self-evaluation of pain due to spinal cord injury.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: matched placebo
|
Placebo
|
EXPERIMENTAL: pregabalin
flexible dosing over 4 weeks followed by 12 weeks maintenance and one week taper period
|
Pregabalin capsules taken twice daily up to 17 weeks (150-600 mg/day)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration Adjusted Average Change (DAAC) of Mean Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
DAAC was derived from participant's daily pain diary, where pain was measured on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-Pain)ranging from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered [unable to sleep due to pain]).
The DAAC was calculated as the mean of all daily pain diary rating post baseline minus the baseline score then multiplied by the proportion of the planned study duration completed by the participant.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Mean weekly score was calculated as the average of the available daily diary pain score values for the week.
Pain score was measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS): 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Number of Participants With >=30% Reduction in Weekly Mean Pain Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Mean weekly score was calculated as the average of the available daily diary pain score values for the week.
Pain score was measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS): 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (Full Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument measuring change in the participant's overall status on a 7-point scale: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Pain-related sleep interference was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered [unable to sleep due to pain]).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Pain Score by Week
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1 through16
|
Mean weekly score was calculated as the average of the available daily diary pain score values for the week.
Pain score was measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS): 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 1 through16
|
Number of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Weekly Mean Pain Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Mean weekly score was calculated as the average of the available daily diary pain score values for the week.
Pain score was measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS): 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Modified Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (10-Item) (mBPI-10) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI-10) Interference Scale is a self administered questionnaire that assessed pain interference with functional activities over the past week.
The items were measured on an 11 point scale, ranging from "does not interfere" (0) to "completely interferes" (10).
A composite score, the pain interference index, was calculated by averaging the 10 items that comprised the scale.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP) - Static Mechanical Allodynia
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated pain scale.
The pain produced by the applied stimulus (static mechanical allodynia - gentle constant mechanical pressure) was rated on an 11 point numerical rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP) - Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated pain scale.
The pain produced by the applied stimulus (dynamic mechanical allodynia - gentle stroking with foam brush) was rated on an 11 point numerical rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP)- Punctata Hyperalgesia
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated pain scale.
The pain produced by the applied stimulus (Punctata hyperalgesia - pinprick) was rated on an 11 point numerical rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP)- Temporal Summation to Tactile Stimuli
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated pain scale.
The pain produced by the applied stimulus (Temporal summation to tactile stimuli - repeated touching/tapping) was rated on an 11 point numerical rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP)- Cold Allodynia
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated pain scale.
The pain produced by the applied stimulus (Cold allodynia - touch with cool metal rod 13-17 degrees celsius was rated on an 11 point numerical rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Assessment of Neuropathic Pain (QANeP)- Cold Hyperalgesia Subscales
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated pain scale.
The pain produced by the applied stimulus (Cold hyperalgesia - touch with cold metal rod 4 degrees celsius) was rated on an 11 point numerical rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - 12 Items Total Intensity Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - Burning Spontaneous Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - Pressing Spontaneous Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - Paroxysmal Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - Evoked Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - Paresthesia/Dysesthesia
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) - Individual Item (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire used to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]).
Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain.
Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100.
Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Number of Participants With Improved Duration of Brief Pain Attacks Based on NPSI - Duration (Item 4)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
NPSI - Temporal item which assesses the duration (number of hours during the last 24 hours) of spontaneous ongoing pain.
Improved duration would be a decrease in the number of hours of spontaneous ongoing pain during the last 24 hours compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Number of Participants With Improvement in the Number of Attacks Based on NPSI - Number of Attacks (Item 7)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
NPSI - Temporal item which assesses the paroxysmal pain (number of pain attacks during the last 24 hours).
Improvement in the number of attacks would be a decrease in the number of paroxysms during the last 24 hours compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)- 9-Item Overall Sleep Problems Index
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) - Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) - Sleep Adequacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) - Snoring
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) - Awaken Short of Breath or With a Headache
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) - Sleep Quantity
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) - Somnolence
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Number of Participants Having Optimal Sleep Based on Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity.
Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with a headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity.
Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales.
HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone).
Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression).
Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales.
HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone).
Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression).
Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score by Week
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1 through 16
|
Pain related sleep interference was assessed on an 11 point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered [unable to sleep due to pain]).
|
Baseline, Week 1 through 16
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Schug SA, Parsons B, Almas M, Whalen E. Effect of Concomitant Pain Medications on Response to Pregabalin in Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia or Spinal Cord Injury-Related Neuropathic Pain. Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E53-E63.
- Markman JD, Jensen TS, Semel D, Li C, Parsons B, Behar R, Sadosky AB. Effects of Pregabalin in Patients with Neuropathic Pain Previously Treated with Gabapentin: A Pooled Analysis of Parallel-Group, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials. Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):718-728. doi: 10.1111/papr.12516. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
- Cardenas DD, Nieshoff EC, Suda K, Goto S, Sanin L, Kaneko T, Sporn J, Parsons B, Soulsby M, Yang R, Whalen E, Scavone JM, Suzuki MM, Knapp LE. A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2013 Feb 5;80(6):533-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318281546b. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2011
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2006
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 4, 2006
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
December 5, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
January 25, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 21, 2021
Last Verified
February 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Neuralgia
- Wounds and Injuries
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Anticonvulsants
- Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
- Calcium Channel Blockers
- Pregabalin
Other Study ID Numbers
- A0081107
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuralgia
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedPost Herpetic NeuralgiaUnited States, Colombia, South Africa, Hong Kong, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Croatia, India, Sweden, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Poland, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Taiwan
-
Bial - Portela C S.A.Terminated
-
Odense University HospitalCompletedPost Herpetic NeuralgiaDenmark
-
DepomedCompletedPost Herpetic NeuralgiaUnited States
-
PfizerCompletedPostherpetic NeuralgiaUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityWithdrawnThe Evaluation of Erector Spinae Plane Block for the Pain Control of Thoracic Postherpetic NeuralgiaThoracic Postherpetic NeuralgiaKorea, Republic of
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedPostherpetic Neuralgia ( PHN )China
-
Bial - Portela C S.A.Completed
-
Grünenthal GmbHCompletedPost Herpetic Neuralgia
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsTerminatedPost-herpetic NeuralgiaAustralia, Taiwan, Germany, France, Portugal, Czechia, United Kingdom, Hungary, Spain, Slovakia, Japan, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Italy, Korea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States