A Study To Compare Pregabalin/PF-00489791 Combination Versus Pregabalin Alone In Post-Herpetic Neuralgia

August 4, 2021 updated by: Pfizer

A TWO WEEK DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CROSSOVER STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A PREGABALIN/PF-00489791 COMBINATION VERSUS PREGABALIN ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH POST-HERPETIC NEURALGIA

Pregabalin is an alpha-2 delta ligand approved for the treatment of neuropathic pain, however, not all patients will respond to this drug. This study will compare the efficacy of pregabalin when administered with an experimental drug PF-00489791, in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia. The efficacy of this combination will be compared to pregabalin alone.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Tennessee Valley Pain Consultants
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • North Alabama RadioPharmacy
      • Tallassee, Alabama, United States, 36078
        • River Region Research, LLC
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85225
        • Radiant Research
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85206
        • Novara Clinical Research
    • California
      • Clovis, California, United States, 93611
        • Community Medical Providers
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93710
        • Sierra Medical Research (Administrative only site)
      • Mission Viejo, California, United States, 92691
        • Prime-Care Clinical Research
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
        • Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34205
        • Bradenton Research Center
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33484
        • Arthritis Associates of South Florida
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33484
        • Delray Research Associates
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
        • Office of Laszlo J Mate, M.D.
    • Illinois
      • Oak Brook, Illinois, United States, 60523
        • American Medical Research, Inc.
    • Massachusetts
      • Brockton, Massachusetts, United States, 02301
        • Beacon Clinical Research
      • Norwood, Massachusetts, United States, 02062
        • ICPS Group
    • Mississippi
      • Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States, 39401-7246
        • Neurological Research Center at Hattiesburg Clinic
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39202
        • CRC of Jackson
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39202
        • Physician's Surgery Center
    • Missouri
      • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65807
        • Clinvest
    • Nebraska
      • North Platte, Nebraska, United States, 69101
        • Centennial Park Medical Building
      • North Platte, Nebraska, United States, 69101
        • Neurology Associates of Great Plains
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Finger Lakes Clinical Research
    • North Carolina
      • Lenoir, North Carolina, United States, 28645
        • North State Clinical Research, PLLC
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, United States, 58501
        • Legacy Pharma Research
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
        • Patient Priority Clinical Sites, LLC
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
        • Lynn Health Science Institute
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
        • Mark A. Fisher, MD-Private Practice
    • Pennsylvania
      • Cranberry Twp., Pennsylvania, United States, 16066
        • Absolute Primary Care, P.C.
      • Johnstown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15904
        • John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute
      • Johnstown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15905
        • Memorial Medical Center
    • Rhode Island
      • Cranston, Rhode Island, United States, 02920
        • New England Center for Clinical Research
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, United States, 76012
        • Medical Clinic of North Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • FutureSearch Trials
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Pinnacle Pain Medicine
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • The Medical Group Of Texas
      • Irving, Texas, United States, 75061
        • Medical and Surgical Clinic of Irving

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female of non-childbearing potential
  • Pain present for more than 3 months after healing of herpes zoster skin rash
  • VAS score of >=40mm at screening and baseline visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pain conditions which might impair the assessment of postherpetic neuralgia
  • Skin conditions in the affected dermatome that could alter sensation other than postherpetic neuralgia
  • History or diagnosis of DSM IV major depressive disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
75mg bid titrating to 150mg bid on day 4
EXPERIMENTAL: 2
Pregabalin 75mg bid titrating to 150mg bid on day 4; PF-00489791: 4mg od titrating to 10mg od on day 4
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 3
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Pain Score on Daily Pain Rating Scale (DPRS)
Time Frame: End of treatment period (included both Week 2 and Week 6)
Pain was assessed by using a daily pain rating scale that consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"), higher scores indicate more pain intensity. Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily. The mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily pain ratings scale scores while taking study medication, at end of each treatment period: Period 1 (Week 2) and Period 2 (Week 6), respectively. Mean pain score had a score range of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), higher scores indicate more pain. Cumulative data of mean pain scores at end of treatment for both the periods was calculated and reported in terms of adjusted mean and standard error.
End of treatment period (included both Week 2 and Week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Time Frame: End of treatment period (included both Week 2 and Week 6)
The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures change in the participants' overall status on a 7-point scale. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), lower scores indicated more improvement. PGIC was evaluated using 3 categories: improvement (scores 1-3), no change (score 4), and worsening (scores 5-7). In this outcome measure percentage of participants with categories: improved, no change and worsening, based on PGIC score were reported. Cumulative data at end of treatment for both the periods (Period 1 [Week 2] and Period 2 [Week6]) was calculated and reported.
End of treatment period (included both Week 2 and Week 6)
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Baseline and Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Participants marked intensity of the pain on a scale, ranging from 0 millimeters (mm) = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain, where higher scores indicate more pain.
Baseline, Week 4
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Time Frame: End of treatment period (included both Week 2 and Week 6)
Participant rated 10-item questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (spontaneous pain like [item 1 to 3]: burning, squeezing, pressure; painful attack like [item 4 to 5]: electric shock, stabbing; pain provoked on [item 6 to 8]: light touching, pressure, contact with something cold; abnormal sensations like [item 9 to 10]: pins and needles, tingling). Each item was rated on an 11-point numerical scale range: 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Total NPSI scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximum pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. Cumulative data of NPSI scale at end of treatment for both the periods (Period 1 [Week 2] and Period 2 [Week 6]) was calculated and reported in terms of adjusted mean and standard error.
End of treatment period (included both Week 2 and Week 6)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 7
Vital signs abnormalities included sitting, standing: systolic, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. Clinical significance was judged by investigator.
Baseline up to Week 7
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 7
Criteria for ECG abnormalities: Maximum QTc (corrected QT) interval, QTcB (Bazett's correction formula) and QTcF (Fridericia's correction formula): 450 to less than (<) 480 milliseconds (msec), 480 to <500 msec and greater than equal to (>=) 500 msec; Maximum QTc interval increase from baseline: >=30 to <60 and >=60 (msec); PR interval: >=300 msec and percent change >=25 or 50 percent; QRS complex: percent change >=25 or 50 percent. Clinical significance was judged by investigator.
Baseline up to Week 7
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematology
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 7
Criteria for hematology abnormalities included Hemoglobin: <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN) and hematocrit: <0.8*LLN. Clinical significance was judged by investigator.
Baseline up to Week 7
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Clinical Chemistry
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 7
Criteria for clinical chemistry abnormalities included total bilirubin: greater than (>) 1.5*upper limit of normal (ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase: >3.0*ULN; total protein, albumin: <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine: >1.3*ULN; uric acid: >1.2*ULN; sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium: <0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN; creatine kinase: >2.0*ULN. Clinical significance was judged by investigator.
Baseline up to Week 7
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Urinalysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 7
Urinalysis abnormalities criteria included: urine specific gravity: <1.003 to >1.030; urine pH: <4.5 to >8; urine glucose, urine ketones, urine proteins, urine blood/hemoglobin: >=1. Clinical significance was judged by investigator.
Baseline up to Week 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 9, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 16, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 23, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 24, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postherpetic Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe