A Prospective Comparison of Alcon LADARVision Wavefront-guided LASIK Enhancement and Conventional LASIK Enhancement for the Correction of Residual Refractive Errors Following LASIK Procedures

January 13, 2010 updated by: Walter Reed Army Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to conduct a prospective clinical trial to compare conventional and WFG LASIK for enhancements on post-LASIK patients. Differences in safety, efficacy, visual quality, and refractive stability will also be compared during this study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20307
        • Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Center For Refractive Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, of any race, and at least 21 years old at the time of the preoperative exam, and have signed an informed consent. The lower age limit of 21 years is intended to ensure documentation of refractive stability.
  • At least 6 months from original LASIK surgery.
  • Stable refraction with more than 0.75D of spherical equivalent from the desired correction and have less than 1.50D of cylinder in the manifest refraction.
  • Both eyes must be within 1.00D spherical equivalent of each other on the manifest refraction test.
  • The eye to be treated with wavefront-guided enhancement must have at least a 9.5mm flap.
  • Manifest refraction and LADARWave™ refractions must be within 1.00D.
  • At least 3 lines potential improvement in UCVA.
  • BSCVA of 20/20 or better.
  • Good corneal flap and interface.
  • Adequate corneal thickness for surgery (residual stromal bed > 280 microns).
  • Able and willing to give informed consent.
  • Located in the greater Washington DC area for a 12-month period.
  • Access to transportation to meet follow-up requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant during the study. Pregnancy will be ruled out with a urine pregnancy test.
  • Concurrent topical or systemic medications that may impair healing, including corticosteroids, antimetabolites, isotretinoin, amiodarone hydrochloride and/ or sumatripin, as determined by history.
  • Medical condition(s), which, in the judgement of the investigator, may impair healing, including but not limited to: collagen vascular disease, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency diseases, and ocular herpes zoster or simplex (As determined by history).
  • Active ophthalmic disease, neovascularization of the cornea within 1mm of the intended ablation zone, or clinically significant lens opacity.
  • Evidence of glaucoma or an intraocular pressure greater than 22mm Hg at baseline.
  • Evidence of keratoconus, corneal irregularity, or abnormal videokeratography in either eye.
  • Flap irregularity(striae, interface debris, scarring, or epithelium).
  • Calculated residual stroma bed less than 280.
  • Stable refraction with less than 0.75D of spherical equivalent from the desired correction and more than 1.5D of cylinder in the manifest refraction.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2
Conventional LASIK Enhancement
Laser treatment to correct residual refractive error left over from initial LASIK correction using LADARvision 4000 excimer laser system.
Experimental: 1
Wavefront guided LASIK Enhancement
Laser treatment to correct residual refractive error left over from initial LASIK correction using wavefront guided LADARvision 4000 excimer laser system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
1.Safety 2. Efficacy 3. Refractive stability
Time Frame: one year after enhancement
one year after enhancement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: RICHARD STUTZMAN, MD, Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 14, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2010

Last Verified

March 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on CONVENTIONAL LASIK ENHANCEMENT

3
Subscribe