Reduction of Conscious Sedation Requirements by Olfactory Stimulation

Colonoscopy for investigation of lower gastrointestinal complaints or for colon cancer screening is one of the more frequent procedures performed by the Divisions of General Surgery and Gastroenterology. Traditionally, this has been performed while under conscious sedation (medication induced) which may improve patient acceptance and tolerance of the procedure but adds to the operative risk of the procedure. The investigators propose a randomized prospective blinded trial to assess the utility of adding pleasing olfactory stimulation to the inhaled oxygen during the conscious sedation for colonoscopy in an effort to reduce the total doses of sedatives required while maintaining a similar level of sedation. This may decrease the overall period of recovery for the patient, increase the number of procedures which may be accomplished, and decrease the potential complications related to conscious sedation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

4. RESEARCH DESIGN/METHODS/SUBJECT JUSTIFICATION

  1. General Approach Two hundred and eighty four patients presenting to the endoscopy clinic will be offered participation in the study. They will be randomized to either 1 ml of sterile water or 1 ml of cherry scented flavoring (Lorann Oils Inc, Lansing MI) (identical oil used by our pediatric anesthesiologists for scenting the anesthesia mask during the induction phase of general anesthesia). These will be connected to the inline oxygen tubing via an Leukens trap with oxygen flowing at 4 liters/ minute rate and titrated to maintain a pulse oximetry saturation level of over 90%. The water or flavoring will not be nebulized into the oxygen. The oxygen will pass through the inactive Leukens trap container and pick up whatever aroma is present. A BIS monitor (Aspect Medical Systems Newton MA) will be applied. Data will be recorded at 5 minute intervals (BIS scores). The BIS score will not be used to titrate the sedative medications since the literature is controversial as to whether a given BIS score is consistently considered adequate sedation. Total recovery time (post procedure), BIS scores, and sedative doses will be recorded.

    1. Research Objective To determine if the addition of pleasing olfactory stimulation can reduce the total dose required for sedatives, decrease the recovery time required but maintain the same levels of sedation.
    2. Detail how many groups or arms are in the study and what each receives ' Two groups will be used. One will receive inhalation of cherry flavored essential oil and the other sterile water.
    3. Randomization Procedures A computer generated block randomized schedule will be used. The patients will be randomized the day of the procedure.
  2. Methods and Materials Two hundred and eighty four consecutive patients presenting for elective colonoscopy with endoscopist provided sedation (ASA 1 and 2 per NMCP policy) will be offered participation in the trial. They will be consented the day of the procedure by one of the subinvestigators and randomized to either receive olfactory stimulation by cherry flavored oil (via in line aerosol chamber similar to nebulizer treatments) or sterile water. A standard volume of 1 ml will be placed in the chamber without additional water. A BIS monitor will be placed and BIS scores recorded at time zero (prior to sedation) and every 5 minutes during the procedure. The BIS score will not be used to titrate sedation rather the clinical parameters used by the endoscopist will be used (pulse oximetry, blood pressure, heart rate, clinical level of arousal) because it is controversial in the literature using BIS scores to titrate conscious sedation. The BIS scores will provide an additional rough estimate as to the equivalence of levels of sedation during the procedure. Total doses of medications, BIS scores, procedure duration, and recovery duration will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

284

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Portsmouth, Virginia, United States, 23708
        • Naval Medical Center Department of Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's presenting for colon cancer screening, colon cancer follow up colonoscopy, or polyp follow up colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to Demerol or Versed, symptomatic colon disease, allergy to a component in the aroma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Dose of narcotics per kg body weight

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
BIS Scores
Recovery Time
Time Frame: minutes
minutes
operative time
Time Frame: minutes
minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul A Lucha, DO, Naval Medical Center Department of Surgery- Portsmouth, VA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 22, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2009

Last Verified

January 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P05-075

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colon Polyps

Clinical Trials on Aroma therapy

3
Subscribe