Using Aromatherapy in Substance Use Disorder

January 6, 2025 updated by: Marian Reven, West Virginia University

Using Aromatherapy for Comfort, Ease, and Stress for Adults Being Treated for Substance Use Disorder in North Central Appalachia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial study is to see if Bergamot, an aroma therapy essential oil, has any effect on comfort, ease, and stress. Participants will be asked to use a bergamot aroma inhaler, which is a small tube about the size of a lipstick container, at least three times a day for one week. Comfort, ease, and stress will be measured with self-report survey at the beginning and at the end of the week. In addition, participants will be asked to complete a daily logbook to record use of the inhaler. The study lasts for one week (7 days). The aims of this study are to explore the effects of Bergamot essential oil on comfort, ease, and stress in adults in a substance use disorder (SUD) treatment program, and to evaluate the feasibility of this type of aroma therapy intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Statement of purpose: The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of an aromatic intervention using bergamot essential oil on comfort, ease, and stress in adults in a SUD recovery program

Research Question: What are differences in comfort, ease, and stress for persons in a substance use disorder program who receive aromatic intervention and for those who do not?

Conceptual framework: An integrated theoretical framework combining the theory of comfort (Kolcaba, 2003) and the concept of welcoming ease (Reven, 2022) will be used as theoretical guidance for this study.

Aims and Objectives: Specific Aim #1: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an aromatherapy intervention by examining recruitment, enrollment and retention rates, intervention fidelity, and cost analysis. Specific Aim #2: Pilot test bergamot essential oil intervention with adults in a substance use disorder recovery program.

Background: Appalachia is at the epicenter of the opioid addiction crisis with hardly a family left untouched by the devastating consequences. Those who make it to recovery programs are often plagued by anxiety and depression. Those in treatment have identified increasing the level of comfort during substance use recovery as vital. Integrating aromatherapy could help improve perception of comfort and reduce stress thus enhancing recovery program progression.

Methods: The study uses a parallel-randomized control group comparison design. Data will be collected from participants daily and post intervention. For Aim #1, descriptive and bivariate analysis will be conducted. Statistical assumptions will be tested. Sample demographics will be reported. For Aim #2, descriptive statistics will be used as well as participant recruitment, enrollment, and retention rates. Reasons for non-participation and attrition will be recorded. Percentage of intervention consistency will be calculated and cost of the intervention will be determined.

Timeline: The proposed study would begin as soon as grant funding is available with projected timeline being August 2022 to December 2023.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
        • West Virginia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants can be at any level of treatment, including peer recovery coach program at West Virginia University Comprehensive Opioid Addiction Treatment (COAT) program
  • All participants must be alert and oriented
  • Provide written consent
  • Able to read and write English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a medical history of asthma or other serious respiratory disease
  • Known allergy to citrus.
  • Dislike of Bergamot

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Adults (>18 years) who are currently receiving treatment for SUD in the outpatient treatment program at West Virginia University Chestnut Ridge Center (WVUCRC) (n = 340 approx.). In addition, participants can be at any level of treatment, including peer recovery coach program. Inclusion criteria are patients diagnosed with SUD who have completed intensive acute phase 1 treatment, and who desire to pursue continuous recovery phases (per facility protocol). All participants must be alert and oriented, provide written consent, and be able to read and write English. Exclusion criteria are patients diagnosed with severe mental illness (who cannot consent to participate), have a medical history of asthma or other serious respiratory disease, and known allergy to citrus.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Adults (>18 years) who are currently receiving treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) in the outpatient treatment program at West Virginia University Chestnut Ridge Center (WVUCRC) (n = 340 approx.). In addition, participants can be at any level of treatment, including peer recovery coach program. Inclusion criteria are patients diagnosed with SUD who have completed intensive acute phase 1 treatment, and who desire to pursue continuous recovery phases (per facility protocol). All participants must be alert and oriented, provide written consent, and be able to read and write English. Exclusion criteria are patients diagnosed with severe mental illness (who cannot consent to participate), have a medical history of asthma or other serious respiratory disease, and known allergy to citrus.
The intervention group will receive an aroma inhaler and logbook to use three times a day for 7 days and complete pre and post surveys for comfort, ease, and stress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine Feasibility (Eligible Participant Recruitment)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
Determine feasibility by assessing the number of eligible participants recruited.
Up to 18 months
Examine Feasibility (Eligible Participant Enrollment)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
Determine feasibility by assessing how many eligible participants enroll.
Up to 18 months
Examine Feasibility (Participant Retention)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
Determine feasibility by assessing count of participants retained.
Up to 18 months
Examine Fidelity of the Intervention
Time Frame: Up to 7 days
Determine fidelity by assessing the count of participants that completed the intervention as directed as shown in the daily logbook.
Up to 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perceived Comfort Level
Time Frame: Pre test prior to day 1 to Post test after 1 week
The concept of comfort is operationalized by the Generalized Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ). This incorporates a Likert scale from 1 to 6 with 1 being the least agreement with the statement and 6 being the most agreement with the statement. The investigators are looking at a change in comfort from before the intervention to after the intervention. There were 28 questions in this scale with a total score between 28 and 168. There are 3 subscales of Relief (8 questions) , Ease (10 questions), and Transcendence (10 questions). A higher score post test cumulative or as subscales indicates more agreement with the statements of overall comfort and its subscales.
Pre test prior to day 1 to Post test after 1 week
Change in Perceived Ease Level
Time Frame: Pre test prior to day 1 to Post test after 1 week
The concept of ease is measured using the Ease measure. This is assessed using a Likert scale from 1 to 4. There is only one score reported for this measure, no subscales. The investigators are looking at a change in ease from before the intervention to after the intervention. There are 20 questions with a range of scores between 20 and 80. The lower score indicates less agreement with the statement about ease. A higher score indicates more agreement. A higher score post test indicates an improvement.
Pre test prior to day 1 to Post test after 1 week
Change in the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Time Frame: Pre test prior to day 1 to Post test after 1 week

The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21) is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress.

Each of the three DASS-21 scales contains 7 items, divided into subscales with similar content. Scores for depression, anxiety and stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. This is assessed using a Likert scale from 0 to 3 with 0 being the least amount of stress and 3 being the highest amount of stress. Scores range from 0 to 63 with lower score indicating less agreement with statements and 63 indicating higher score in agreement with statements. A lower score indicates improvement in DASS.

Pre test prior to day 1 to Post test after 1 week
Visual Analogue Scale to Assess Daily Perceived Comfort
Time Frame: 7 days
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used as a daily measure of comfort. It provides validation for the GCQ using a 100mm line where Comfort is rated using a mark on the line between 0 and 100 "I feel as comfortable as possible" with 0 being the least comfortable and 100 being the most comfortable.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marian Reven, PhD, West Virginia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data will be maintained by the primary investigator, and will be analyzed and reported by this individual only.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorders

Clinical Trials on Aroma Inhaler with Bergamot essential oil

Subscribe