Long-term Study of Efficacy/Safety of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel in Acne Vulgaris Subjects

August 8, 2022 updated by: Galderma R&D

A Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of a Fixed Combination of Adapalene 0.1% and Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% (Adapalene and Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel) Gel in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris

This was a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative study that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy profile of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Gel.

Subjects were evaluated at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.

Safety was evaluated by spontaneous reports of Adverse Events (AEs), the Local Tolerability Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, and Stinging/Burning), routine laboratory testing (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), and monitoring of suspected sensitizations. Efficacy was evaluated by analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts, and by the Subject's Assessment of Acne.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

452

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
        • Phoebe Rich, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with facial involvement.
  • A minimum of 20 but not more than 50 Inflammatory lesions.
  • A minimum of 30 but not more than 100 Noninflammatory lesions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with presence of nodules or cysts.
  • Acne conglobate, acne fulminans, secondary acne, or severe acne.
  • Underlying diseases that required the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy.
  • Use of prohibited medications prior to the study unless appropriate washout period was documented.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide
Participants were treated with adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 percent (%) (W/W) gel topically to the face and trunk area once daily in the evening.
Adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 % (W/W) gel topically daily in the evening.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory and Total Lesion Count at Month 12 LOCF
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 LOCF
Percent change in inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions at Month 12 was measured from baseline lesions. The noninflammatory lesion count was the sum of open comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind an open follicular orifice (blackhead) and closed comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind a closed follicular orifice (whitehead). The inflammatory lesion count was the sum of papules (a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter) and pustules (a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate). The total lesion count was the sum of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Missing adapalene and benzoyl peroxide data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Baseline, Month 12 LOCF
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 6
Time Frame: At Month 6
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
At Month 6
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 12
Time Frame: At Month 12
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
At Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Erythema
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for erythema (abnormal redness of the skin) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no erythema), mild (1- slight pinkness present), moderate (2- definite redness, easily recognized), severe (3- intense redness). The worst severity scores were generally mild or moderate, and rarely severe.
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Scaling
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for scaling (abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follow; none (0- no Scaling), mild (1- barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing), moderate (2- obvious but not profuse shedding), severe (3- heavy scale production).
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Dryness
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for dryness (brittle and/or tight sensation) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no dryness), mild (1- slight but definite roughness), moderate (2 -moderate roughness), severe (3- marked roughness).
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Stinging/Burning
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for stinging/burning [prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of) dosing] was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no stinging/ burning), mild (1- slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), moderate (2- definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat), severe (3- hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort).
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Number of Participant With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 14
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Baseline up to Month 14
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 14
Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.
Baseline up to Month 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michael Graeber, MD, Galderma R&D

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

March 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide

3
Subscribe