Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin for Treatment-Naïve Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C

January 13, 2014 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Versus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Alone for Treatment-naïve Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.

Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment. In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%. In this study, treatment with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin achieved a higher SVR rate that that with pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin (100% vs. 25%).

Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, and the superior response of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin to pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin in treating dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alfa-2a alone in treatment naïve dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients, with the reported prevalence varying from 3% to 80% worldwide. (1-3) Although these patients usually have mild symptoms and moderate elevation of alanine transaminase levels, recent international collaborative survey and prospective studies found that anti-HCV seropositivity and positive HCV RNA were risk factors for mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (4-7) Furthermore, progressive hepatic fibrosis, poor patient and graft survival were observer in dialysis patients with HCV infection who undergo renal transplantation (RT), suggesting immunosuppression following RT may worsen the course of hepatic fibrosis and renal graft function. (8-13) These lines of evidence indicate that HCV infection in the dialysis population is an important issue to be tackled.

Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.(14,15) The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated), (16-21) which may result from different pharmacokinetic profiles between these two pegylated IFNs. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,(22,23) and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents. (24,25) Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment. (26-28) In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%. (29) In this study, treatment with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin achieved a higher SVR rate that that with pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin (100% vs. 25%) Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, and the superior response of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin to pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin in treating dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alfa-2a in treatment naïve dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

377

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years old
  • Creatinine clearance (Ccr) < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Anti-HCV (Abbott HCV EIA 3.0, Abbott Diagnostic, Chicago, IL) positive > 6 months
  • Detectable serum quantitative HCV-RNA (Cobas Taqman HCV test, version 2, Roche Diagnostics) with a dynamic range of 25-391000000 IU/ml

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving interferon-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C
  • Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or hemoglobinopathy
  • Neutropenia (neutrophil count, <1,500/mm3)
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet <90,000/ mm3)
  • Co-infection with HBV or HIV
  • Chronic alcohol abuse (daily consumption > 20 g/day)
  • Autoimmune liver disease
  • Decompensated liver disease (Child classification B or C)
  • Neoplastic disease
  • An organ transplant
  • Immunosuppressive therapy
  • Poorly controlled autoimmune diseases, pulmonary diseases, cardiac diseases, psychiatric diseases, neurological diseases, diabetes mellitus
  • Evidence of drug abuse
  • Unwilling to have contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks)
Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks)
Other Names:
  • Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)
  • Ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)
Experimental: Peginterferon alfa-2a
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks)
Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks)
Other Names:
  • Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)Rate
Time Frame: 1.5 year
1.5 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse Event (AE)-Related Withdrawal Rate
Time Frame: 1.5 year
1.5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

Collaborators

National Science Council, Taiwan
Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Chen-Hua Liu, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan Universitys Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 200703010M

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Saudi Arabia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe