Evaluation of Orientation and Visual Acuity of Four Toric Soft Contact Lenses When Head is Tilted at 90 Degrees

May 5, 2015 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Clinical and Theoretical Evaluation of Factors Affecting Soft Toric Lens Performance: Part 3

The purpose of this study is to determine the relative performance of a new toric soft contact lens against three toric contact lens currently available in market, specifically with orientation and visual acuity when head is tilted at 90 degrees.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non-dispensing single-masked (subject-masked), randomised, 1-visit controlled study, ~2 hour duration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Farnham, United Kingdom, GU9 7EN
        • Visioncare Research Ltd.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. be at least 18 and less than or equal to 50 years of age
  2. be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the protocol.
  3. have a distance spherical component between -1.00 D and -6.00D with cylinder in the range of 0.75 D to 1.75D
  4. Sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT.
  5. Have normal, healthy eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  2. Pre-existing ocular disease precluding contact lens fitting.
  3. Insufficient lacrimal secretions
  4. Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea
  5. Previous eye surgery involving the anterior segment
  6. Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge).
  7. Use of concurrent ocular medication
  8. Active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1: lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A/balafilcon A/omafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. Period 1: lotrafilcon B /period 2: senofilcon A / period 3: balafilcon A / period 4: omafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 2 lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A/senofilcon A/balafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: lotrafilcon B / period 2: omafilcon A / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: balafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 3 lotrafilcon B/balafilcon A/senofilcon A/omafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: lotrafilcon B / period 2: balafilcon A / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: omafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 4 senofilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A/balafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: senofilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: omafilcon A / period 4: balafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 5 senofilcon A/omafilcon A/balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: senofilcon A / period 2: omafilcon A / period 3: balafilcon A / period 4: lotrafilcon B
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 6 senofilcon A/balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: senofilcon A / period 2: balafilcon A / period 3: lotrafilcon B / period 4: omafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 7 omafilcon B/lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A/balafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: omafilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: balafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 8 balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A/omafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: omafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 9 balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A/senofilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: omafilcon A / period 4: senofilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 10 balafilcon A/senofilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: senofilcon A / period 3: lotrafilcon B / period 4: omafilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 11 balafilcon A/senofilcon A/omafilcon A//lotrafilcon B
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: senofilcon A / period 3: omafilcon A / period 4: lotrafilcon B
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
Active Comparator: Group 12 balafilcon A/omafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A
One intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: omafilcon A / period 3: lotrafilcon B / period 4: senofilcon A
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens
toric contact lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lens Orientation During Head Tilt.
Time Frame: after fit of each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation on the eye with the head tilted.
after fit of each of the four lens insertions
Visual Acuity During Head Tilt
Time Frame: after each of the four lens insertions

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity.

logMar values > 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values <0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

after each of the four lens insertions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up.
After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of 4 lens insertions.,
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and out(towards the temple).
After each of 4 lens insertions.,
Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and in(towards the nose).
After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing out(towards the temple).
After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing in(towards the nose).
After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and out.
After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and in.
After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.
Time Frame: After each of the four lens insertions
Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down.
After each of the four lens insertions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Graeme Young, BSc, MPhil, Visioncare Research Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR-0710 pt 3
  • ETOR-507(under GNR-011)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Astigmatism

Clinical Trials on senofilcon A

3
Subscribe