Efficacy and Safety Study of Reslizumab to Treat Poorly Controlled Asthma

July 18, 2016 updated by: Ception Therapeutics

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Reslizumab in the Treatment of Poorly Controlled Asthma in Subjects With Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of reslizumab in the treatment of subjects with poorly controlled asthma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Objectives:

Primary: To demonstrate the ability of reslizumab to improve asthma control in subjects with active asthma and eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Secondary:

  • To study the ability of reslizumab to reduce induced sputum eosinophil (EOS) counts in subjects with asthma.
  • To study the ability of reslizumab to reduce the number of eosinophilic clinical asthma exacerbations (CAE) in subjects with asthma. A CAE is defined as a ≥ 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; absolute value) from the baseline value or a requirement for emergency treatment of asthma, hospital admission for asthma or treatment with three or more days of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for asthma worsening.
  • To assess the safety and tolerability of reslizumab in subjects with asthma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

106

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V4G5
        • Hôpital Laval
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N4N1
        • Heritage Medical Research Clinic, University of Calgary
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V6
        • Queen's University, Richardson's House
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J1C5
        • Hopital du Sacre-Couer de Montreal
    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Children'S Hospital of Orange County-Pediatric Subspecialty Faculty
    • Colorado
      • Centennial, Colorado, United States, 80112
        • Allergy & Clinical Research Center
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • Asthma & Allergy Associates, P.C.
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206
        • National Jewish Medical & Research Center
    • Illinois
      • Normal, Illinois, United States, 61761
        • Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC
    • Maryland
      • Columbia, Maryland, United States, 21044
        • Pulmonary Disease & Critical Care Associates, P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55402
        • Clinical Research Institute
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University of School of Medicine
    • Nebraska
      • Papillion, Nebraska, United States, 68046
        • The Asthma & Allergy Center
    • New York
      • Cortland, New York, United States, 13045
        • Health Sciences Research at Asthma & Allergy
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Univeristy Health Services
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • David Bernstein
      • Sylvania, Ohio, United States, 43560
        • Toledo Center for Clinical Research
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73120
        • Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Research Center
    • Oregon
      • Medford, Oregon, United States, 97504
        • Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
      • Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, United States, 19422
        • Allergy and Asthma Specialists
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Vanderbilt Asthma Sinus Allergy Program & Research Centers
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23229
        • Virginia Adult & Pediatric Allergy and Asthma
    • Washington
      • Seatle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • ASTHMA, Inc
    • Wisconsin
      • Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States, 53228
        • Allergy, Asthma and Sinus Center
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53972
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Allergy/Asthma Clinical Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • male or female subjects aged ≥ 18 to 75 years at time of screening
  • female if she is of non-childbearing potential, or of childbearing potential and willing to use specific barrier methods specified in protocol
  • confirmation of asthma
  • symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of asthma that is poorly controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid as determined by an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score ≥ 1.5
  • requirement for treatment with high dose daily fluticasone and at least one other agent for the treatment of asthma not specifically excluded in the protocol
  • requirement for >/= 3% eosinophils in induced sputum at Screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a clinically important event that would interfere with study schedule or procedure or compromise subject safety
  • a diagnosis of hypereosinophilic syndrome
  • an underlying lung disorder
  • a current smoker
  • use of systemic immunosuppressive agents within 6 months of study
  • current use of systemic corticosteroids
  • received attenuated live attenuated vaccines within three months prior to study entry
  • expected to be poorly compliant with study drug, procedures, visits
  • aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled
  • participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry
  • participation in biologics study within 3 months prior to study entry
  • receipt of anti-human interleukin-5 (hIL-5) antibody within 6 months of study entry
  • female subjects who are pregnant or nursing
  • concurrent infection or disease that may preclude assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis
  • concurrent immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency [HIV], or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [AIDS] or congenital immunodeficiency).
  • current suspected drug and/or alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reslizumab 3 mg/kg
Reslizumab 3 mg/kg intravenous (IV) on Day 0 of each 28-day (+/- 7 days) cycle, for 4 cycles
Other Names:
  • CEP-38072
  • Cinquil™
  • CTx55700
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Saline placebo IV on Day 0 of each 28-day (+/- 7 days) cycle, for 4 cycles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score
Time Frame: Baseline through End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
The ACQ is a 7 question instrument. Each question has 7 possible answers of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Each increasing value is an indication of poorer asthma control. At protocol specified visits, the participant answered questions 1 to 6, circling the response that best described how that participant was during the past week, on the basis of a daily diary for the week before the visit. At the actual visit, study center personnel reviewed the questions and responses with the participant and determined the response and score for question 7. The overall ACQ score was presented as the mean of these 7 individual scores and was a number between 0 and 6, but not necessarily an integer.
Baseline through End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of ACQ Responders at End of Therapy
Time Frame: Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
Responders were defined as participants achieving at least a 0.5 reduction from baseline to End of Therapy in ACQ score. The ACQ is a 7 question instrument. Each question has 7 possible answers of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Each increasing value is an indication of poorer asthma control. At protocol specified visits, the participant answered questions 1 to 6, circling the response that best described how that participant was during the past week, on the basis of a daily diary for the week before the visit. At the actual visit, study center personnel reviewed the questions and responses with the participant and determined the response and score for question 7. The overall ACQ score was presented as the mean of these 7 individual scores and was a number between 0 and 6, but not necessarily an integer.
Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1)
Time Frame: Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
The change in FEV1 from baseline to End of Therapy was determined. FEV1 was measured during pulmonary function tests using standard spirometry measurements.
Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in Percent Predicted FEV1
Time Frame: Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
The change in percent predicted FEV1 from baseline to End of Therapy was calculated from the FEV1 measured during pulmonary function tests using standard spirometry measurements. Each participant's percent predicted FEV1 was calculated by adjusting the FEV1 for age, sex, height and race. The percent predicted FEV1 was then calculated by comparing the predicted FEV1 to the observed FEV1 using the Crapo formula (Crapo et al 1981a, Crapo and Morris 1981b, Crapo et al 1982).
Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in Induced Sputum Eosinophil Levels
Time Frame: End of Screening or Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
End of Screening or Baseline, End of Therapy (up to 15 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs)
Time Frame: up to 15 weeks
A CAE was defined as a 20% or more decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, absolute value) from the baseline value, a requirement for emergency treatment of asthma, hospital admission for asthma, or treatment with 3 or more days of oral corticosteroids for asthma worsening.
up to 15 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, and AEs Leading to Study Discontinuation
Time Frame: From start of study drug through 15 weeks + 30 days
Participants may have been included in more than 1 category. AEs summarized were those that began or worsened after dispensation of the study drug and before 30 days after the last dose of study drug. If the severity of an AE was missing, the AE was reported as "severe." If drug relationship of an AE was missing, the AE was reported as "probably related." WFT=withdrawn from treatment.
From start of study drug through 15 weeks + 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD, Cephalon (Ception)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Saline

3
Subscribe