Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A 100kV Protocol (PROTECTION-II)

August 26, 2008 updated by: Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

The objective of this study is to compare radiation dose of a 100kV scan protocol to the standard 120kV scan protocol. We hypothesize that the 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.

Secondary endpoints of the study include quantitative image quality parameters, diagnostic accuracy for 120 vs.100kV studies compared to invasive angiography in patients who underwent subsequent invasive coronary angiography

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

All patients scheduled for a coronary CT scan are screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are included if they have stable sinus rhythm (heart rate <100 bpm) and a body weight < 90 kg or a body mass index (BMI) < 30. Informed signed consent is obtained from these patients and the CT scan is prepared. After topogram scan and the native scan for Ca-Scoring, patients are randomized in two groups with the use of sealed envelopes. After that contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography is performed with the 120kV- or 100kV-protocol.

The CT examination is evaluated by two experienced investigators on a per-vessel basis and all results and study-related data are collected in a dedicated database. For assessment of image quality, a previously established 4-point score system is used and quantitative image quality parameters are measured.

A 30 day follow-up after the CT examination aims to evaluate if patients underwent invasive coronary angiography or were scheduled for a myocardial stress / perfusion test (such as stress-echocardiography, myocardial scintigraphy or stress perfusion imaging by MRI).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

400

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Munich, Germany, 80636
        • Recruiting
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joerg Hausleiter, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries)
  • stable sinus rhythm
  • patient weight < 90kg or body mass index < 30 kg/m2
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-ECG triggered studies
  • non-coronary CTA studies, e.g. bypass graft CTAs, pre- or post EP studies, CABG planning studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Reduced tube voltage of 100kV.
standard 120 kV
reduced voltage of 100 kV
Active Comparator: 2
Standard tube voltage of 120kV.
standard 120 kV
reduced voltage of 100 kV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compared with a 120kV protocol the use of a 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
impact of the 100kV scan protocol on quantitative image quality parameters, e.g. image noise, signal and contrast intensity, signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratios
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values) for 120kV vs. 100 kV studies when compared with invasive coronary angiography on a per-vessel based analysis.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
frequency of non-diagnostic CTA studies when comparing 120kV and 100kV
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joerg Hausleiter, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2008

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on tube voltage

Subscribe