Investigate Impact of Yasmin vs Microgynon on Hemostasis Parameters in Healthy Women

December 29, 2014 updated by: Bayer

Single Center, Double Blind, Randomized, Crossover Study to Investigate the Impact of the Oral Contraceptive Yasmin (30 µg EE / 3 mg DRSP) Compared to Microgynon (30 µg / 150 LNG) on Hemostasis Parameters in 40 Female Volunteers

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the oral contraceptive YASMIN (containing: drospirenone 3 mg/ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg) in comparison with the oral contraceptive MICROGYNON (containing: levonorgestrel 150 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 30mcg) on factors of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in female subjects

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 33 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically normal safety laboratory results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Standard contraindications for use of combined oral contraceptives (class label). Including:

    • Presence or history of thromboembolic process in veins (such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) or arteries (e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction) or a known genetic component (homozygous), venous thromboembolic event in a close relative (parents or siblings) at younger age (</= 40 years)
  • Acute and chronic severe liver dysfunction or disease. There should be an interval of at least 6 months between the subsidence of a viral hepatitis (normalization of the liver parameters) and the start of the study medication.
  • Use of preparations where experience shows affect on the activity of hepatic enzymes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 2
The study medication was packaged in 21-tablet blister packs. Each subject kit contained 7 blister packs plus 1 reserve blister pack.Subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group received 21 consecutive days of hormonally active tablets (LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg). In each treatment cycle 21 tablets (1 tablet daily) have to be taken in sequence, followed by a pill-free interval of 7 days. The treatment period was 7 cycles (28 days per cycle).
Experimental: Arm 1
The study medication was packaged in 21-tablet blister packs. Each subject kit contained 7 blister packs plus 1 reserve blister pack.Subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group received 21 consecutive days of hormonally active tablets (3mg DRSP/0.03 mgEE). In each treatment cycle 21 tablets (1 tablet daily) have to be taken in sequence, followed by a pill-free interval of 7 days. The treatment period was 7 cycles (28 days per cycle).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pro-coagulatory parameters: Factor VIII (activity), Fibrinogen
Time Frame: At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
Anti-coagulatory parameters: Protein C (activity), Antithrombin III(activity), APC resistance (factor V mutation)
Time Frame: At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rosing test: APC sensitivity ratio
Time Frame: At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
Pro-coagulatory parameters: Factor VIII (activity), Activation markers: D-dimer, Prothrombin fragment 1+2
Time Frame: At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Yasmin (DRSP 3mg/EE 0.03 mg)

3
Subscribe