Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticle Gel Versus a Common Antibacterial Hand Gel

April 15, 2008 updated by: Madigan Army Medical Center

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of a Novel Silver Nanoparticle Gel Versus a Common Antibacterial Hand Gel Against Bacterial Hand Flora

The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticle gel to a commercialized alcohol-based hand gel on bacterial counts isolated from the hands of 40 volunteers seeded with Serratia marcescens, a surrogate microbial marker. Specific aims of this study are: Aim #1: Compare the immediate antimicrobial efficacy of a one-time application of silver nanoparticle gel (SilvaSorb , AcryMed, Inc., Portland, OR) versus an alcohol-based hand gel (Purell, GoJo Industries, Akron, OH) in reducing transient bacterial counts isolated from hands seeded with S. marcescens.

Aim # 2: Compare the persistent antimicrobial efficacy of a one-time application of silver nanoparticle gel (SilvaSorb) versus an alcohol-based hand gel (Purell) over a 10 minute time frame in producing a persistent reduction on transient bacterial counts isolated from hands seeded with S. marcescens.

Aim # 3: Compare user acceptability of silver nanoparticle gel (SilvaSorb) versus an alcohol-based hand gel (Purell) using a self-assessment questionnaire.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objective of this randomized controlled, double blinded, 2x3 experimental study is to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticle gel compared to an alcohol-based hand gel on bacterial counts isolated from the hands of 40 healthy, adult, military student volunteers. The study will be conducted in two phases: the first phase will consist of a methods development period and the second phase will consist of the formal pilot study. For phase I, the first four participants from the sample pool will be assigned into one of two groups (nano-silver gel or alcohol-based gel) whereas in Phase II, the participants will be randomized into one of two groups. Participants in both phases will follow a 7 day washout period where subjects will refrain from using antimicrobial products for a week prior to testing. Testing of participants in both phases will start with a baseline bacterial hand count. This will be accomplished by using a surrogate biomarker (S. Marcescens). This microorganism was selected because it is considered the standard surrogate marker to be used in hand hygiene evaluations and because it produces a characteristic red colony that is easily distinguishable from normal microbial populations of the hands making colony counting more accurate. Sampling of bacterial flora will be accomplished utilizing an established "modified glove juice" technique in which the participant's dominant hand is placed into a large sterile bag containing a sampling solution, which removes the surrogate bacteria. Once baseline samples have been collected, all participants will then complete two additional random ordered timed conditions involving the surrogate biomarker and one of the two test gels. For each test condition, five mL of solution will be withdrawn from the collection bag, diluted, plated, and incubated for 36 hours. For the immediate efficacy testing, a glove juice sampling will be obtained after a 1 minute application of the gel. For the persistent efficacy testing, a glove juice sampling will be obtained after a 10 minute application of the gel. To ensure the biomarker has been removed, all subjects will wash hands with a 70% ethanol surgical handwash. The use of an UV-C light will also be implemented for 20 seconds as an additional precaution. Participants in phase I will have an additional glove juice sampling at the end of degerming to validate the protocol. All participants will end the study by completing a 4 question visual analog questionnaire to determine user acceptability of the gels. The percent difference of total bacterial counts from baseline will be used as the outcome variable. An unpaired Student's t-test (or an appropriate non-parametric test) will be used for data analysis for each of the study aims.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98431
        • Recruiting
        • Madigan Army Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mary S. McCarthy, RN, PhD, CNSN
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael L Schlicher, RN, PhDc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elizabeth J. Bridges, RN, PhD, C

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Ability to read and understand English (for consent purposes)
  • Free of clinically evident dermatitis, open wounds, sores, or breaks in hand skin determined by a Visual Skin Scale (VSS).
  • Free of hand jewelry or artificial nail enhancements
  • Have fingernails that are clean and extend no longer than approximately one (1) mm past the nail bed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone directly working in a healthcare, public health, or long term residence setting.
  • Currently receiving any antibiotics, or on any other in as investigational drug, steroids or immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Reports cuts, scratches, or skin disorders, or Dermatitis visualized by the PI/AI using the Visual Skin Scale (VSS).
  • Reports any form of current immune disorders such as AIDS, lupus, any cancers (solid or hematopoietic), or other medical conditions such as diabetes, hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, or an organ transplant recipient.
  • Known sensitivities or allergies to silver, alcohol, latex, soap, detergent, antibiotics.
  • Any use of artificial nail enhancements or any non-removable rings
  • Primary care provider or resident in a setting where someone has known impaired immunocompetence (currently receiving chemotherapy, HIV positive), requires wound care or intravenous management.
  • Currently pregnant/lactating or taking care of children under the age of 3 or anyone that requires diaper changing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: nano-silver gel
SilvaSorb® gel applied topically to the hands with a limited exposure time of 10 minutes
Other Names:
  • SilvaSorb® gel
Active Comparator: alcohol-based gel
Purell gel applied topically to the hands with a limited exposure time of 10 minutes
Other Names:
  • Purell

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Antimicrobial efficacy (as measured by the percent change in microbial counts from baseline of subjects)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
User acceptability (as measured by the total of points received per product from a questionnaire)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary S McCarthy, RN, PhD, CNSN, Nurse Researcher, Madigan Army Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 16, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 16, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2008

Last Verified

April 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 208035

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Normal Subjects

Clinical Trials on nano-silver gel exposed

3
Subscribe