Somatuline Autogel Preference and Health Economy Study (SAPHE)

November 21, 2019 updated by: Ipsen

A Phase IV, International, Open-label, Randomised, Cross-over Study to Assess Patient Preference and Health Economy in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumours, Treated With Lanreotide Autogel Given as Self Administration.

The primary aim of this study is to assess which method of lanreotide Autogel administration patients with neuroendocrine tumours prefer - self/partner administrations or healthcare provided administrations. The study will also assess if self/partner administration can be performed without loss of efficacy and with a preserved safety profile. The impact of self/partner administration on resource utilisation and costs will be studied. In addition, we will also assess the healthcare provider's experience of the two administration practices.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Aarhus University Hospital / Medisinsk afd. V
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense Univeristy Hospital / S-AMB
      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • Haukeland University Hospital / Kreftafd
      • Tromsø, Norway, 9038
        • University Hospital North-Norway / GastroLab
      • Trondheim, Norway, 7006
        • S:t Olavs Hospital / Medisinsk Afd
      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital / Kirurgkliniken
      • Linköping, Sweden, 581 85
        • Linköping University Hospital / Onkologen
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 141 86
        • Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge / GastroCentrum Medicin
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
        • Karolinska University Hospital, Solna / Kirurgmottagningen
      • Uppsala, Sweden, 752 85
        • Akademiska Hospital/ Kliniken f onkologisk endokrinologi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of written informed consent from the patient and their partner (if the partner will be administering the lanreotide Autogel injections during the self administration period)
  • Male or female aged 18 years of age or older
  • Treated with lanreotide Autogel 90 or 120 mg every 28th day for carcinoid symptoms on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to inclusion. The patient is presumed to be clinically stable during the coming months
  • Neuroendocrine tumour confirmed by biopsy and visible on radiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a history of hypersensitivity to the Investigational Medicinal Product or drugs with a similar chemical structure
  • Has abnormal baseline findings, any other medical condition(s) or laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might jeopardise the patient's safety or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objective(s) of the study
  • Has a life expectancy less than a year, as judged by the Investigator
  • The patient or their partner is not considered competent in injection technique, as judged by the Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Preference for Self or Partner Administration
Time Frame: Between week 30 to 34
A global question was asked: 'If you could choose, which administration method would you like to use on a regular basis?' A) Healthcare professional provided injection B) Self/ partner administered injection
Between week 30 to 34

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Stating at Least One Injection Interfered With Daily Activities
Time Frame: Between baseline to week 32, after each injection (8-9 injections)
The subject was asked: 'Does the treatment administration used today interfere with your daily activities?'
Between baseline to week 32, after each injection (8-9 injections)
Number of Patients Stating at Least One Injection Negatively Interfered With Psychological Wellbeing
Time Frame: Between baseline to week 32, after each injection (8-9 injections)
The subject was asked: 'Does the treatment administration used today negatively interfere with your psychological wellbeing?'
Between baseline to week 32, after each injection (8-9 injections)
Days Sick Leave
Time Frame: Group 1 - between week 8 to 20 (self or partner administration), between week 20 to 32 (HCP administration). Group 2 - between week 20 to 32 (self or partner administration), between week 0 to week 12 (HCP administration)
Health care and patient costs associated with the treatment of carcinoid symptoms in subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel were assessed through recording loss of production for subject through total number of days sick leave of the employed patients (n=6).
Group 1 - between week 8 to 20 (self or partner administration), between week 20 to 32 (HCP administration). Group 2 - between week 20 to 32 (self or partner administration), between week 0 to week 12 (HCP administration)
Total Number of Visits to HCP Due to Carcinoid Symptoms
Time Frame: Group 1 - between week 8 to 20 (self or partner administration), between week 20 to 32 (HCP administration). Group 2 - between week 20 to 32 (self or partner administration), between week 0 to week 12 (HCP administration)
Health care and patient costs associated with the treatment of carcinoid symptoms in subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel were assessed by recording the total number of visits made by participants (n=12) to HCP due to carcinoid symptoms.
Group 1 - between week 8 to 20 (self or partner administration), between week 20 to 32 (HCP administration). Group 2 - between week 20 to 32 (self or partner administration), between week 0 to week 12 (HCP administration)
Perceived Symptom Control Evaluation in Respect to Episodes of Flushing
Time Frame: Group 1 - baseline, week 16 to 20 (self or partner administration) and week 30 to 34 (HCP administration). Group 2 - baseline, week 12 (HCP administration) and week 30 (self or partner administration).
Participants were asked how they perceived the symptoms in respect to episodes of flushing since the last injection. Participants included in the study were previously treated with lanreotide Autogel and therefore the assessment at baseline was made in comparison to their previous injection outside of the study protocol.
Group 1 - baseline, week 16 to 20 (self or partner administration) and week 30 to 34 (HCP administration). Group 2 - baseline, week 12 (HCP administration) and week 30 (self or partner administration).
Perceived Symptom Control Evaluation in Respect to Episodes of Diarrhoea
Time Frame: Group 1 - baseline, week 16 to 20 (self or partner administration) and week 30 to 34 (HCP administration). Group 2 - baseline, week 12 to 16 (HCP administration) and week 30 to 34 (self or partner administration).
Participants were asked how they perceived the symptoms in respect to episodes of diarrhoea since the last injection. Participants included in the study were previously treated with lanreotide autogel and therefore the assessment at baseline was made in comparison to previous injection outside of the study protocol.
Group 1 - baseline, week 16 to 20 (self or partner administration) and week 30 to 34 (HCP administration). Group 2 - baseline, week 12 to 16 (HCP administration) and week 30 to 34 (self or partner administration).
Chromogranin A Levels
Time Frame: Group 1 - Baseline, week 16 to 20 and 30 to 34. Group 2 - Baseline, week 12 and 30 to 34.

Biochemical control was assessed by analysing chromogranin A levels at each site visit, which was mandatory for all subjects.

'Before self or partner administration' was assessed at baseline for group 1 and at week 12 for group 2.

'After self or partner administration' was assessed at week 16 to 20 for group 1 and at week 12 for group 2.

'Before HCP administration' was assessed at week 16 to 20 for group 1 and at baseline for group 2.

'After HCP administration' was assessed at week 30 to 34 for group 1 and week 12 for group 2.

Group 1 - Baseline, week 16 to 20 and 30 to 34. Group 2 - Baseline, week 12 and 30 to 34.
5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Levels
Time Frame: Group 1 - Baseline, week 16 to 20 and 30 to 34. Group 2 - Baseline, week 12 and 30 to 34.

Biochemical control was assessed by analysing 5-HIAA levels at each site visit, which was judged as necessary by the investigator at each site.

'Before self or partner administration' was assessed at baseline for group 1 and at week 12 for group 2.

'After self or partner administration' was assessed at week 16 to 20 for group 1 and at week 12 for group 2.

'Before HCP administration' was assessed at week 16 to 20 for group 1 and at baseline for group 2.

'After HCP administration' was assessed at week 30 to 34 for group 1 and week 12 for group 2.

Group 1 - Baseline, week 16 to 20 and 30 to 34. Group 2 - Baseline, week 12 and 30 to 34.
Healthcare Professionals With Positive Response to Specified Questions on Self or Partner Administration Method
Time Frame: Between week 30 to 34

Assessed by the number of HCP with a positive response 'yes' to two questions:

  1. Based on your experience during this trial, did you feel confident in the safety of your patients?
  2. Based on your experience during this trial, would you recommend suitable patients to try self or partner administration?
Between week 30 to 34

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuroendocrine Tumour With Carcinoid Symptoms

Clinical Trials on lanreotide (Autogel formulation)

3
Subscribe