GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Lixisenatide Versus Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes for Glycemic Control and Safety Evaluation, on Top of Metformin (GETGOAL-X)

October 20, 2016 updated by: Sanofi

A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter 24-week Study Followed by an Extension Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 Versus Exenatide on Top of Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Controlled With Metformin

The purpose of this study is to compare the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010) in comparison to exenatide (Byetta®), as an add-on treatment to metformin, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment, followed by an extension.

The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide in comparison to exenatide (Byetta®), as an add-on treatment to metformin, on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (absolute change) at Week 24.

The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide on percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than 7 percent (%) or HbA1c less than or equal to (<=) 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight; to evaluate safety, tolerability and to assess the impact of gastrointestinal tolerance on quality of life (QoL) (patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal disorders - quality of life [PAGI-QOL]).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients who complete the 24-week main open-label treatment would undergo a variable open-label extension treatment, which ends for all patients at approximately the scheduled date of Week 76 visit (Visit 24) for the last randomized patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

639

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Wien, Austria
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Santafe de Bogota, Colombia
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Horsholm, Denmark
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Athens, Greece
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Milano, Italy
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Gouda, Netherlands
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Lysaker, Norway
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Bromma, Sweden
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
    • New Jersey
      • Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States, 08807
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit, insufficiently controlled with metformin at a stable dose of at least 1.5 gram per day for at least 3 months prior to screening visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HbA1c less than (<) 7% or greater than (>) 10% at screening
  • At the time of screening age < legal age of majority
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Treatment with another antidiabetic pharmacological agent than metformin within the 3 months preceding the screening
  • FPG at screening >250 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (13.9 millimole per liter [mmol/L])
  • Body mass index (BMI) less than or equal to (<=) 20 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
  • Weight change of >5 kg during the 3 months preceding the study
  • History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery, inflammatory bowel disease
  • History of metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis, within 1 year prior to screening
  • Hemoglobinopathy or hemolytic anemia, receipt of blood or plasma products within 3 months prior to the time of screening
  • Within the last 6 months prior to screening, history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization
  • Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to the time of screening
  • Cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine disease, active malignant tumor or other major systemic disease or patients with short life expectancy making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult, history or presence of clinically significant diabetic retinopathy, history or presence of macular edema likely to require laser treatment within the study period
  • Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at the time of screening with a resting systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure >180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or >95 mmHg, respectively
  • Laboratory findings at the time of screening: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase: >2 times upper limit of the normal (ULN) laboratory range; amylase and/or lipase: >3 times ULN; total bilirubin: >1.5 times ULN (except in case of Gilbert's syndrome); hemoglobin <11 gram/deciliter and/or neutrophils <1500 per cubic millimeter (mm^3) and/or platelets <100 000/ mm^3; positive test for Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody; and positive serum pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential
  • Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram or vital signs at the time of screening that, in the judgment of the investigator or any sub-investigator, precludes safe completion of the study or constrains efficacy assessment
  • Patients who are considered by the investigator or any sub-investigator as inappropriate for this study for any reason (for example, impossibility to meet specific protocol requirements, such as attending scheduled visits, being able to do self-injections; likelihood of requiring treatment during the screening phase and treatment phase with drugs not permitted by the clinical study protocol; investigator or any sub-investigator, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol)
  • Use of other oral or injectable antidiabetic or hypoglycemic agents than metformin (for example, sulfonylurea, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, rimonabant, exenatide, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, insulin) within 3 months prior to the time of screening
  • Use of systemic glucocorticoids (excluding topical application or inhaled forms) for 1 week or more within 3 months prior to the time of screening
  • Use of any investigational drug within 3 months prior to study
  • Participation in any previous study with lixisenatide
  • Renal impairment defined with serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dL in women and serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL in men
  • Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including, but not limited to, gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment, within 6 months prior to the time of screening
  • Allergic reaction to any glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist in the past (for example, exenatide, liraglutide) or to metacresol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lixisenatide
2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to the end of treatment.
Self administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast.
Other Names:
  • OptiClik®
Metformin to be continued at stable dose (at least 1.5 gram per day) up to the end of treatment.
Active Comparator: Exenatide
1-step initiation regimen of exenatide: 5 mcg twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mcg BID up to the end of treatment.
Metformin to be continued at stable dose (at least 1.5 gram per day) up to the end of treatment.
Self administered by subcutaneous injections twice daily within the hour preceding breakfast and within the hour preceding dinner.
Other Names:
  • Byetta®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Baseline, Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Week 24
Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Routine fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c > 8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Baseline up to Week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Baseline, Week 24
Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, for up to 116 weeks
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available.
First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, for up to 116 weeks
Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Patient's Satisfaction to Treatment (PAGI-QOL) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
PAGI-QOL: a 30-item self-administered questionnaire to measure health related QOL of patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders during past 2 weeks. Consists of 5 sub-scales. Each item rated on a 0-5 point Likert scale (0 [none of the time] to 5 [all the time]). Sub-scale score calculated by dividing sum of all items of subscale by number of items in the sub-scale. Total score calculated by taking mean of sub-scale scores. Sub-scale score and total score ranges from 0=none of the time (lowest score) to 5=all of the time (highest score) with lower scores indicating better QOL. The on-treatment period for this variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Baseline, Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Lixisenatide (AVE0010)

3
Subscribe