Study of SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) in Patients With Schizophrenia

April 9, 2022 updated by: Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.

Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Confirmatory Study of SM-13496 (Lurasidone HCl) in Patients With Schizophrenia <Phase III Study>

The study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SM-13496 compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

460

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Etc., Japan
        • Japan: 67 sites
      • Seoul, Etc., Korea, Republic of
        • Korea: 14 sites
      • Taipei, Etc., Taiwan
        • Taiwan: 11 sites

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient meets DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia.
  • Patient is 18 or older but younger than 75 years of age on the day of signing informed consent.
  • Patient understands the objectives, nature, and other aspects of the study and voluntarily agrees to participate in the study by providing written informed consent.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, water intoxication, or paralytic ileus.
  • Patient has Parkinson's disease.
  • Patient has a history or complication of malignancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SM-13496 (lurasidone HCl) 40mg
SM-13496 40 mg was administered orally once daily.
Lurasidone HCl: 40 mg/day
Lurasidone HCl: 80 mg/day
Experimental: SM-13496 (lurasidone HCl) 80mg
SM-13496 80mg was administered orally once daily.
Lurasidone HCl: 40 mg/day
Lurasidone HCl: 80 mg/day
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo was administered orally twice daily.
Active Comparator: Risperidone
Risperidone was administered orally twice daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 [Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)]
The PANSS is an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure is comprised of 30 items and three subscales: the Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility; the Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms; and the General Psychopathology subscale addresses other symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 items and ranges from 30 through 210. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Baseline and Week 6 [Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Positive Subscales at Week 6 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)
The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Positive subscale contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Positive subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Negative Subscales at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)
The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The Negative subscale contains seven questions to assess blunted effect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of motivation, and similar symptoms. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS Negative subscale score is the sum of all 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS General Psychopathology Subscales at Week 6 (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)
The PANSS is comprised of 30 items and three subscales. The General Psychopathology subscale addresses other 16 symptoms such as anxiety, somatic concern, and disorientation. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS General Psychopathology subscale score is the sum of all 16 items and ranges from 16 through 112. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Baseline and Week 6 (LOCF)
Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant who was taking a medicinal (investigational) product. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with a start date on or after the date of the first dose through the end of follow-up, or adverse events occurring before the date of first dose and worsening during the treatment or follow-up period.
From Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation
Time Frame: From Baseline to up to 8 weeks
From Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. An adverse event was considered serious if it met one or more of the following criteria: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening (i.e., a patient was at immediate risk of death at the time of the event, not an event where occurrence in a more severe form might have caused death); Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; Was considered to be an important medical event.
From Baseline to up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Drug Development Division, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 27, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe