Management of Infants Born to Group B Streptococcus Positive Mothers.

July 14, 2008 updated by: IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

Management of Infants Born to Group B Streptococcus Positive Mothers: Laboratory Tests vs Physical Examination

Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has greatly decreased but not abolished early-onset neonatal sepsis caused by GBS. According to current recommendations, the evaluation of infants at risk for GBS sepsis should include a complete blood count (CBC), WBC differential, a blood culture (BC) and a period of observation. The usefulness of CBC and BC in the evaluation process is not firmly established.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

After implementation of appropriate guidelines, early-onset GBS sepsis has become a low incidence disease (CDC). Recent rates are as low as 0.34 cases /1000 live births. According to CDC recommendations, the evaluation of infants at risk for GBS sepsis should include a complete blood count (CBC), WBC differential, a blood culture (BC) and a period of observation. The usefulness of CBC and BC in the evaluation process is not firmly established. There are several reviews on the predictive value of CBC and putative markers of early onset neonatal sepsis, but there seems to be no ideal laboratory test to assist the clinician in the diagnosis (Fowlie 1998, Malik 2003, Ottolini 2003). Given the continuing concerns about the reliability of laboratory tests, one may ask the question of whether physical examination might be at least as good as haematological indices. We are not aware of studies assessing the value of physical examination vs CBC, in the evaluation of asymptomatic at risk newborns.

The aim of this study was to compare two approaches in the management of infants at risk for GBS sepsis: laboratory tests (CBC, differential and BC) with observation vs clinical observation alone.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

16394

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All newborns born in Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Italy) during the study period

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All newborns born in Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Italy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1 (first year)
Asymptomatic infants born to GBS-positive mothers or to mothers with risk factors and incomplete prophylaxis were managed according to the CDC protocol. Blood cultures and CBC were performed and the infant was observed for 48 hours. Participating hospital were free to perform any additional test, such as CRP, MiniESR, etc
2 (second year)
Asymptomatic infants born to GBS-positive mothers or to mothers with risk factors and incomplete prophylaxis were managed with clinical observation only. Clinical surveillance was based on 3 signs: 1. Skin appearance (pink, pale, mottled, cyanotic); 2. Respiratory rate (>50 or <50 breaths per minute); 3. Dyspnea (Yes / No)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of infants treated with antibiotics
Time Frame: Study period
Study period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the beginning of antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: Study period
Study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sergio De Marini, MD, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Luigi Cantoni, MD, San Daniele Hospital, San Daniele, Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2008

Last Verified

July 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Subscribe