- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00716781
Management of Infants Born to Group B Streptococcus Positive Mothers.
Management of Infants Born to Group B Streptococcus Positive Mothers: Laboratory Tests vs Physical Examination
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
After implementation of appropriate guidelines, early-onset GBS sepsis has become a low incidence disease (CDC). Recent rates are as low as 0.34 cases /1000 live births. According to CDC recommendations, the evaluation of infants at risk for GBS sepsis should include a complete blood count (CBC), WBC differential, a blood culture (BC) and a period of observation. The usefulness of CBC and BC in the evaluation process is not firmly established. There are several reviews on the predictive value of CBC and putative markers of early onset neonatal sepsis, but there seems to be no ideal laboratory test to assist the clinician in the diagnosis (Fowlie 1998, Malik 2003, Ottolini 2003). Given the continuing concerns about the reliability of laboratory tests, one may ask the question of whether physical examination might be at least as good as haematological indices. We are not aware of studies assessing the value of physical examination vs CBC, in the evaluation of asymptomatic at risk newborns.
The aim of this study was to compare two approaches in the management of infants at risk for GBS sepsis: laboratory tests (CBC, differential and BC) with observation vs clinical observation alone.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All newborns born in Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Italy)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
1 (first year)
Asymptomatic infants born to GBS-positive mothers or to mothers with risk factors and incomplete prophylaxis were managed according to the CDC protocol.
Blood cultures and CBC were performed and the infant was observed for 48 hours.
Participating hospital were free to perform any additional test, such as CRP, MiniESR, etc
|
|
2 (second year)
Asymptomatic infants born to GBS-positive mothers or to mothers with risk factors and incomplete prophylaxis were managed with clinical observation only.
Clinical surveillance was based on 3 signs: 1. Skin appearance (pink, pale, mottled, cyanotic); 2. Respiratory rate (>50 or <50 breaths per minute); 3. Dyspnea (Yes / No)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Number of infants treated with antibiotics
Time Frame: Study period
|
Study period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the beginning of antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: Study period
|
Study period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Sergio De Marini, MD, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
- Principal Investigator: Luigi Cantoni, MD, San Daniele Hospital, San Daniele, Italy
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GBS FVG 2004-2006
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingSepsis | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis and Septic Shock | Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit | Sepsis, Septic Shock | Sepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock | Sepsis With Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) | Sepsis With Acute Organ DysfunctionUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingSepsis Induced Myocardial Dysfunction | Sepsis Induced CardiomyopathyEgypt
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; The Royal College of AnaesthetistsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityEnrolling by invitationSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States