- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00794664
Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis
A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hypercholesterolemia is characterized by markedly elevated low density lipoproteins (LDL). Elevated LDL is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD).
Mipomersen is an antisense drug that reduces a protein in the liver cells called apolipoprotein B (Apo-B). Apo-B plays a role in producing low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (the "bad" cholesterol) and moving it from the liver to one's bloodstream. High LDL-C is an independent risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) or other diseases of blood vessels. It has been shown that lowering LDL-C reduces the risk of heart attacks and other major adverse cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study is to determine whether mipomersen safely and effectively lowers LDL-C in severely hypercholesterolemic patients who are on a maximally tolerated lipid-lowering regimen and who are not on apheresis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1M5
-
-
Quebec
-
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H 5H6
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
-
-
-
-
-
Hardec Kralove, Czech Republic, 500 05
-
Pilsen, Czech Republic, 305 99
-
Praha, Czech Republic, 128 08
-
Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic, 686 68
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 13353
-
Freiburg, Germany, 79106
-
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
-
Koln (Lindenthal), Germany, 50937
-
-
-
-
-
Cape Town, South Africa, 7500
-
Cape Town, South Africa, 7925
-
Gauteng, South Africa, 0157
-
Pretoria, South Africa, 0002
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, MI3 9WL
-
-
Surrey
-
Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom, GU2 7XX
-
-
-
-
Florida
-
Jupiter, Florida, United States, 33458
-
Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30338
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Concord, New Hampshire, United States, 03301
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212
-
-
South Carolina
-
Aiken, South Carolina, United States, 29801
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Fasting LDL-C ≥200 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) at screening and the presence of at least 1 of the following criteria:
- Myocardial infarction (MI)
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
- Coronary artery disease documented by angiography or any other accepted imaging technique
- Positive exercise test (≥1 mm ST-depression at maximal exercise or test terminated because of angina) or a perfusion defect (e.g., thallium or single photon emission computed tomography)
- Other clinical atherosclerotic diseases: peripheral artery disease, symptomatic carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm
- Or, if alternative above were not met, fasting LDL-C ≥300 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L)
- On stable, maximally tolerated statin therapy for 8 weeks
- On stable, medication from an additional class of hypolipidemic agents for 8 weeks.
- On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks
- Stable weight for 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
- Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
|
1 mL weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
|
|
Experimental: Mipomersen
200 mg weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
|
200 mg (1 mL), weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
LDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
LDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
For patients with triglycerides <400 mg/dL, LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's calculation; and for patients with triglycerides >=400 mg/dL, LDL-C was directly measured by the central laboratory using ultracentrifugation.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Primary Efficacy Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Apo-B was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Total cholesterol was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Total Cholesterol at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Non-HDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Non-HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Apo-B at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Triglycerides were measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Triglycerides at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Lipoprotein(a) was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Lipoprotein(a) at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
VLDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
VLDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
LDL-C and HDL-C were measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Apo-A1 was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Apo-A1 at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
HDL-C was measured in mg/dL.
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments.
An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1.
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
|
HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)
Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Duell PB, Santos RD, Kirwan BA, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S, Kastelein JJP. Long-term mipomersen treatment is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2016 Jul-Aug;10(4):1011-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 9.
- Santos RD, Raal FJ, Catapano AL, Witztum JL, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Tsimikas S. Mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide to apolipoprotein B-100, reduces lipoprotein(a) in various populations with hypercholesterolemia: results of 4 phase III trials. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Mar;35(3):689-99. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304549. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
- McGowan MP, Tardif JC, Ceska R, Burgess LJ, Soran H, Gouni-Berthold I, Wagener G, Chasan-Taber S. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of mipomersen in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049006. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Metabolic Diseases
- Arteriosclerosis
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases
- Lipid Metabolism Disorders
- Hyperlipidemias
- Dyslipidemias
- Heart Diseases
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Myocardial Ischemia
- Coronary Disease
- Hypercholesterolemia
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antimetabolites
- Anticholesteremic Agents
- Hypolipidemic Agents
- Lipid Regulating Agents
- Mipomersen
Other Study ID Numbers
- MIPO3500108
- 2008-006020-53 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypercholesterolemia
-
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and...Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryActive, not recruitingMedication Adherence | Adherence, Medication | Treatment Adherence | Familial Hypercholesterolemia | Motivational Interviewing | Adherence, Patient | Treatment Adherence and Compliance | Patient Compliance | Adherence | Hypercholesterolemia, Familial | Patient Adherence | Hypercholesterolemia, Autosomal Dominant and other conditionsRussian Federation
-
Direct PlantesUnknownHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIAFrance
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsNot yet recruitingDyslipidemia, Hypercholesterolemia
-
Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere VirgiliRecruitingFamilial Hypercholesterolemia | Familial Hypercholesterolemia - Homozygous | Familial Hypercholesterolemia - HeterozygousSpain
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Accuredit Therapeutics US LimitedNot yet recruitingHeterozygous Familial HypercholesterolemiaChina
-
Addpharma Inc.Not yet recruitingPrimary Hypercholesterolemia
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalRecruitingPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Salubris (Chengdu) Biotechnology Co., Ltd.CompletedHypercholesterolemia and Mixed DyslipidemiaChina
-
Provident Clinical ResearchGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPrimary HypercholesterolemiaUnited States
-
Addpharma Inc.CompletedPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of