Argatroban Versus Lepirudin in Critically Ill Patients (ALiCia)

June 20, 2012 updated by: Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Argatroban Versus Lepirudin in Critically Ill Patients - A Randomized Double-blind Trial

The purpose of this study is to test the hypotheses that argatroban significantly increases efficacy and safety of renal replacement therapy measured as life time of haemodialysis filters as compared to lepirudin

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Critically ill patients are at increased risk to develop deep vein thrombosis due to immobilisation and/or the underlying disease. Usually, heparin is used for anticoagulation in these patients. However, a serious complication of heparin therapy is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT). HIT is an immune-mediated syndrome caused by antibodies directed against the heparin-PF4-complex, which bind to platelets via the Fc part, thereby activating platelets causing aggregation and hypercoagulability. Thus, with HIT the risk of thrombosis and organ damage paradoxically even increases during heparin administration. HIT is associated with significant morbidity and mortality if unrecognized. Therefore, patients, who develop thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis during heparin therapy are suspicious for HIT and have to receive alternative anticoagulants2.

The direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin (Refludan®) is equally effective as heparin in prevention of deep vein thrombosis and lung embolism3. The elimination half life of lepirudin averages 60 min, but in renal failure it may increase up to 48 hours. Critically ill patients often develop acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Thus, if lepirudin is used in these patients, intensive dose adjustment is necessary to avoid accumulation and severe bleeding. In contrast, effective anticoagulation is needed to prevent clot formation within the extracorporeal circuit, as clotting substantially increases the patients´ risks and costs of therapy.

Argatroban (Argatra®), another direct thrombin inhibitor, has recently been shown to be safe and effective in prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with HIT. Interestingly, argatroban is eliminated by hepatic metabolism. Therefore, no initial dose adjustment is necessary in patients with renal failure. Preliminary reports document the feasibility of argatroban for anticoagulation during haemodialysis. Observational data in patients undergoing continuous haemodialysis suggest that life time of filters during argatroban anticoagulation is not limited due to clot formation. Thus, argatroban would be safer and more effective than lepirudin in critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.

Therefore, we propose a prospective randomized double-blinded trial to test the hypotheses that argatroban significantly increases efficacy and safety of renal replacement therapy measured as life time of haemodialysis filters as compared to lepirudin

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Klinik für Anästhesiologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Thrombocytopenia suspicious for HIT with decrease in platelet count >50% from baseline obtained at hospital admission
  • 4 T´s score for HIT probability >3 AND/OR positive ELISA for HIT
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Informed consent (if applicable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transient thrombocytopenia due to intraoperative bleeding
  • Active bleeding
  • Intracranial operations
  • Liver dysfunction with spontaneous aPTT> 60 sec.
  • History of adverse events or sensitivity against study drugs
  • Pregnancy
  • Age<18 years
  • Preexisting psychiatric/neurologic disorders with long-term inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PR1
Patients treated with Argatroban (Argatra®), a direct thrombin inhibitor
Argatra (Argatroban) will be diluted to 0.6 mg/ml and 0.5 µg/kg/min will be administered continuously in patients without liver disfunction. In patients with liver disfunction, defined by a bilirubin of > 4mg/dl, argatroban will be administered as a continuous infusion of 0,25 µg/kg/min with a final concentration of 0,3 mg/ml.
Other Names:
  • Argatra®
  • MA number: 62085.00.0
Active Comparator: PR2
Patients treated with Lepirudin (Refludan®), a direct thrombin inhibitor
Refludan (Lepirudin) will be diluted to a final concentration of 0.1mg/ml and initiated as a continuous infusion of 5µg/kg/h in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy. In patients with moderate renal impairment (Creatinine ≥1,3 mg/dl) a final concentration 0,2 mg/ml of will be used to provide continuous infusion of 10 µg/kg/h. Patients without renal impairment (Creatinine < 1,3 mg/dl) will receive a continuous infusion of 50 µg/kg/h by a final concentration of 1 mg/ml of Lepirudin.
Other Names:
  • Refludan®
  • MA number: EU/1/97/035/003

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean running time of a maximum of two consecutive haemodialysis circuits
Time Frame: seven days starting at time of HIT suspicion
seven days starting at time of HIT suspicion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of bleeding, transfusion requirements, thromboembolic events, anaphylactic reactions, and SUSARs, length of hospital stay, mortality, time till target aPTT
Time Frame: seven days starting at time of HIT suspicion
seven days starting at time of HIT suspicion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Kienbaum, MD, Uniklinik Düsseldorf, Klinik für Anästhesiologie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Clinical Trials on Argatroban

3
Subscribe