- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00842179
Groin Complications Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Either Manual Compression or PERCLOSE Device
February 11, 2009 updated by: Clinyx, LLC
Femoral Access Site Groin Complication Rates After 2517 Groin Punctures Undergoing Vascular Closure by Either Manual Compression or the Perclose Vascular Closure Device
The objective of this study is to compare groin complication rates in low and high risk patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) closed by either a 6 French Perclose vascular closure device (VCD) or manual compression.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
It is commonly accepted that that there exists a learning curve in performing successful groin closure with Vascular Closure Devices (VCD).
Manual compression continues to be 'standard of care' at most institutions for closure of 5 - 8 French femoral arteriotomies, as previous studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of vascular closure devices have failed to show a statistically significant decrease in groin complication rates when compared to manual compression.
Importantly, no studies to date have been performed to specifically assess the potential decrease in vascular complication rates by highly experienced VCD operators, when their safety results are compared to manual compression.
This retrospective, multi-center study will demonstrate a lower vascular complication rate in PCI patients post deployment of a 6 Fr Perclose VCD by a single, experienced operator, when compared to manual compression in two comparable, high volume, hospital cardiac catheterization laboratories.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
2517
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
- Baptist Hospital of Miami
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients who require vascular closure post percutaneous coronary intervention
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who received vascular closure with the Perclose device post PCI at Baptist Miami Hospital
- Patients who received vascular closure by manual compression at Tampa General Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients less than 18 years old
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Manual Closure
Patients who received vascular closure with manual compression after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
|
|
Perclose Device
Patients who received vascular closure with the Perclose VCD after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
major vascular complications
Time Frame: 0-30 days (during Index hospitalization)
|
0-30 days (during Index hospitalization)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Minor vascular complications
Time Frame: 0-30 days (during index hospitalization)
|
0-30 days (during index hospitalization)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jonathan Roberts, MD, Baptist Health South Florida
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 11, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
February 12, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
February 12, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 11, 2009
Last Verified
February 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- CL-003
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Vascular Closure
-
Ladera MedicalRecruitingVascular Closure | Femoral Arteriotomy ClosureNetherlands, Australia, Belgium
-
Ladera MedicalAvaniaActive, not recruitingVascular Closure | Femoral Arteriotomy ClosureAustralia
-
University of FloridaAccess Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
xDot Medical, IncBright Research PartnersNot yet recruitingVascular Closure Devices
-
Cordis CorporationNAMSACompletedVenous Vascular ClosureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedVascular ClosureNetherlands, Germany
-
Cordis US Corp.NAMSARecruitingVenous Vascular Closure | Electrophysiology StudyUnited States
-
Ladera MedicalNot yet recruitingVascular Closure DeviceAustralia
-
Vivasure Medical LimitedActive, not recruiting
-
Vivasure Medical LimitedCompleted