The Influence of Oral Hygiene on Local Wound and Systemic Infection in Patients With Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement (PEG)

March 10, 2009 updated by: Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

Predicting Oral Care Before Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG). The Influence of Oral Hygiene on Local Wound and Systemic Infection in Patients With PEG Placement

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is commonly used for long term enteral feeding of patients with severe dysphagia. The most common complication is peristomal wound infection. The possible mechanism the bacterial from the oral cavity disseminate during the PEG insertion through the stomach to the abdominal wall, in spite the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis, have reported low rates of wound infection in patients who were already receiving antibiotics at the time of PEG Our hypothesis that washing the oral cavity with antibiotic solution prior the insertion PEG , We planned a prospective, randomised, double blind, one centre study of antibiotic mouth wash solution (0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate) as.prophylaxis in PEG

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients scheduled to undergo PEG

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous GI surgery
  • Coagulopathy
  • Sepsis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
Mouth wash prior to procedure
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 2. Plain water
Mouth wash prior to procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assess impact mouth wash (containing 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate) (Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Haifa Israel) prior PEG insertion.
Time Frame: One month
One month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Follow the peristomal wound infection in patients who had prepared by mouth wash to a group a patients without mouth washing.
Time Frame: One month
One month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 11, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 11, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2009

Last Verified

March 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia

Clinical Trials on Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2%

3
Subscribe