Brachial Artery Peak Velocity Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness

April 28, 2009 updated by: Hospital del SAS de Jerez

Brachial Artery Peak Velocity Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

The investigators designed this study to determine the predictive value for predicting fluid responsiveness of noninvasive evaluation of respiratory variation of peak velocity in brachial artery, in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Predicting the hemodynamic response to fluid administration (or fluid responsiveness) in critical ill patients is still a matter of concern, since fluid overload could worse the clinical situation of these patients. Parameters of fluid responsiveness usually require an invasive monitoring (like arterial pulse pressure variation).

We hypothesize that noninvasive evaluation of respiratory variation of peak velocity in brachial artery using Doppler ultrasound could provide a feasible estimation on fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cádiz
      • Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain, 11407
        • Hospital del SAS de Jerez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Critical ill patients with controlled mechanical ventilation and acute circulatory failure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with controlled mechanical ventilation, equipped with an indwelling radial artery catheter and for whom the decision to give fluids will be taken because the presence of one or more clinical signs of acute circulatory failure:

    • systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (or a decrease >50 mmHg in previously hypertensive patients)
    • the need of vasopressor drugs
    • oliguria (urine output <0.5 ml/kg/min for at least 2 h)
    • tachycardia
    • delayed capillary refilling
    • the presence of skin mottling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for the volume administration: evidence of fluid overload and/or of hydrostatic pulmonary edema
  • Patients with instable cardiac rhythm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Acute circulatory failure
Patients for whom the decision to give fluids was taken because the presence of one or more clinical signs of acute circulatory failure.
500 ml of synthetic colloid (Voluven®, hydroxyethylstarch 6%; Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) infused over 30 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Predictive value of respiratory variation in brachial artery peak velocity before volume expansion assessed by ROC curve. We defined responser as patients that increased stroke volume index equal or more than 15% after fluid administration.
Time Frame: immediately after volume expansion
immediately after volume expansion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate the predictive value of pulse pressure variation for predicting hemodynamic response to fluid administration, comparing with the predictive value of respiratory variation of brachial artery peak velocity.
Time Frame: immediately after fluid administration
immediately after fluid administration
Evaluate the predictive value of stroke volume variation for predicting hemodynamic response to fluid administration, comparing with the predictive value of respiratory variation of brachial artery peak velocity.
Time Frame: immediately after volume expansion
immediately after volume expansion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: M. Ignacio Monge García, Hospital del SAS de Jerez

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2009

Last Verified

April 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UIE-SCCU-200902

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Clinical Trials on Fluid administration

3
Subscribe