Olmesartan Comparison to Losartan in Hypertensive Subjects

March 7, 2011 updated by: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-comparator, 8-week Forced-titration Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan Potassium in Hypertensive Subjects

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the FDA approved blood pressure medication olmesartan medoxomil compared to the FDA approved medication losartan potassium.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

941

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85213
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85050
    • California
      • Harbor City, California, United States, 90710
      • Tustin, California, United States, 92780
      • Westlake Village, California, United States, 91361
    • Colorado
      • Pueblo, Colorado, United States, 81001
    • Florida
      • DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
      • Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States, 33442
    • Indiana
      • South Bend, Indiana, United States, 46614
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67205
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87108
    • New York
      • Binghamton, New York, United States, 13701
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
    • Tennessee
      • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
      • New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States, 37825
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females aged > 18 years who are not institutionalized and have signed informed consent.
  • Mean cuff seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) must be > 95 mmHg and < 115 mmHg and a mean cuff seated systolic BP must be < 180 mmHg when measured at two consecutive qualification study visits during the placebo run-in phase.
  • The difference in mean cuff seated diastolic BP must be < 7 mmHg between two consecutive qualification study visits during the placebo run-in phase.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with an HbA1c ≥ 9.5% at Screening.
  • Subjects with serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of olmesartan medoxomil and losartan potassium, including cardiovascular, renal (including the absence of one kidney), pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal (including clinically significant malabsorption), endocrine/metabolic (with the exception of non-insulin, dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1c < 9.5% at Screening), hematologic/oncologic (including an active malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma), neurologic and psychiatric diseases.
  • Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction, angina, coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery or heart failure within the last 12 months.
  • Subjects with any history of New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF). A history of New York Heart Association Class I or II CHF may be exclusionary at the discretion of the Investigator.
  • Subjects with a history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the last 1 year.
  • Subjects with clinically significant cardiac conduction defects, including second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, an accessory bypass tract, or any arrhythmia requiring medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Olmesartan
Olmesartan 20 mg once daily for four weeks followed by 40mg one daily for four weeks.
Oral tablets, once daily, at either 20mg or 40mg daily.
Other Names:
  • Olmetec
  • Benicar
Placebo Comparator: Placebo followed by Olmesartan
Placebo capsule of olmesartan once daily for 2 weeks, followed by olmesartan 20 mg once daily for two weeks, followed by olmesartan 40 mg for 4 weeks
Oral tablets, once daily, at either 20mg or 40mg daily.
Other Names:
  • Olmetec
  • Benicar
placebo oral tablets once daily for two weeks
Active Comparator: Losartan
Losartan 50 mg once daily for four weeks, followed by losartan 100 mg once daily for four weeks
losartan potassium oral tablet at either 50mg or 100 mg daily dose.
Other Names:
  • Cozaar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)
Time Frame: Day 0, Week 8
The change from baseline in trough SDBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Day 0, Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)
Time Frame: Day 0, Week 4
The change from baseline in trough SSBP at Week 4 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Day 0, Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)
Time Frame: Day 0, Week 8
The change from baseline in trough SSBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Day 0, Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)
Time Frame: Day 0, Week 4
The change from baseline in trough SDBP at Week 4 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Day 0, Week 4

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental Change From Week 4 to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 8
The change from Week 4 in trough SDBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Week 4, Week 8
Incremental Change From Week 4 to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 8
The change from Week 4 in trough SSBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Week 4, Week 8
Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goals at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4

Percentage of participants who achieved the following goals:

Systolic blood pressure: <140 mmHg, <135 mmHg, <130 mmHg, <120 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure: <90 mmHg, <85 mmHg, <80 mmHg Blood pressure: <140/90 mmHg, <135/80 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg

Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goals at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8

Percentage of participants who achieved the following goals:

Systolic blood pressure: <140 mmHg, <135 mmHg, <130 mmHg, <120 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure: <90 mmHg, <85 mmHg, <80 mmHg Blood pressure: <140/90 mmHg, <135/80 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg, <120/80 mmHg

Week 8
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
In week 4, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours.
Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
In week 8, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours.
Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am to 4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm to 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
In week 4, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Daytime (8am to 4pm) and nighttime (10pm to 6am) systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings are summarized.
Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am to 4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm to 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
In week 8, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Daytime (8am to 4pm) and nighttime (10pm to 6am) systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings are summarized.
Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Blood Pressure During the Final 2, 4, and 6 Hours of the Dosing Interval at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
In week 4, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings taken in the final 2, 4, and 6 hours of the 24-hour ABPM cycle are summarized.
Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Blood Pressure During the Final 2, 4, and 6 Hours of the Dosing Interval at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
In week 8, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings taken in the final 2, 4, and 6 hours of the 24-hour ABPM cycle are summarized.
Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2
The change from baseline in trough systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Week 2 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit.
Baseline, Week 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on olmesartan medoxomil

3
Subscribe