Linking Self-Management and Primary Care for Diabetes 2 (LB2)

May 21, 2015 updated by: Kaiser Permanente

Linking Self-Management and Primary Care for Diabetes

This project is primarily a behavioral study. We employed a three-arm, patient-randomized practical effectiveness trial to evaluate the impact of two different interactive, multimedia self-management programs, relative to "enhanced" usual care. The two interventions will be (a) the revised program from our present study, based on our social-ecological theory and the 5 As self-management model, plus enhanced support (ASM+ES) that includes practical, but extensive, ongoing support and b) largely Automated Self-Management (ASM). These programs will be compared to a realistic "enhanced usual care" (UC) condition that will provide health risk appraisal feedback, control for computer interactions, and provide standardized advice on behavior change, but not the hypothesized key intervention processes of goal-setting, barriers identification, problem-solving, or social-environmental support. Patients will be randomized to conditions within clinic and will participate for 1 year.

The proposed project will test the effectiveness of a practical, automated-based intervention for primary care patients to facilitate dietary and physical activity practices, and medication-taking. Analyses will focus on primary outcomes of (a) dietary, physical activity, medication-taking outcomes, and (b) the UKPDS risk equation as well as secondary quality-of-life, patient-activation, and patient care outcomes (Specific Aim #2). Using the RE-AIM measures, we will analyze the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention programs (Specific Aim #3), and also factors related to program implementation, linkage to primary care, and program success with emphasis on cost, cost-effectiveness, and mediators and moderators of outcomes such as social-environment support (Aim #4).

Primary hypotheses:

  1. That the Automated Intervention received by Automated self-management (ASM) condition and ASM plus enhanced support conditions (ASM+ES) will be superior to usual care on the primary outcomes.
  2. That the ASM+ES condition will be superior to the ASM alone condition on primary outcomes at the 12-month follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

463

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80237-8066
        • Kaiser Permanente of Colorado

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria:
  • being 25-75 years of age,
  • live independently,
  • have a telephone,
  • are able to read in either English or Spanish,
  • able to access the Internet at least twice per week
  • are capable of providing informed consent,
  • have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least 1 year
  • are overweight (BMI ≥ 25), and
  • have at least one additional UKPDS equation risk factor (i.e., high lipids, hypertension, HbA1c, or smoking)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria:
  • Suffering dementia or active psychosis,
  • Being on end-stage dialysis,
  • or predicted to live fewer than 2 years
  • Being institutionalized.
  • Pregnant women - women with gestational diabetes will not be enrolled, because there needs are quite different, but we won't specifically exclude women who are pregnant AND otherwise eligible, since we do acknowledge that it's possible that someone may be unaware that they are pregnant at the time of enrollment, or may become pregnant during the study, and that this will not affect their continued participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computer Assisted Self Management plus Social Support
an interactive, automated self-management (ASM) program that uses web and interactive voice recognition (IVR) media combined with enhanced support in the form of group Diabetes Care Management visits and live follow up phone calls from Diabetes Care Managers
Computer Assisted Self Management plus Social Support
No Intervention: Usual care
will receive a health-risk appraisal, interactive CD-ROM program that provides standardized advice on behavior change, but not the hypothesized key intervention processes of goal setting, barriers identification, problem solving, or social environmental support.
Experimental: Computer Assisted Self Management
An interactive, automated self-management (ASM) program that uses web and interactive voice recognition (IVR) media.
Computer Assisted Self Management using and interactive, automated self-management program that uses web and interactive voice recognition (IVR) media

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in health behaviors (e.g., dietary patterns, physical activity, medication taking) and biologic outcomes (HbA1c, lipid ratio, blood pressure, and smoking status).
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months and 12 months
Baseline, 4 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Diabetes-specific quality of life (Diabetes Distress Scale), patient activation (PAM scale), and perceived social-environmental support (the Chronic Illness Resources Survey) at 4- and 12-month follow-ups.
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Russell E Glasgow, PhD, Kaiser Permanente

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2R01DK035524-21 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R01DK035524 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on CASM +

3
Subscribe