Comparison of a Needle-free Injection Method With a Needle-syringe Injection Method (T-jet®)

Study to Compare Injection Anxiety Immediately Before the Administration of Each Dose of Tev-Tropin® Between a Needle-syringe Injection Method and a Needle-free Injection Method in Pediatric Subjects With Human Growth Hormone Deficiency

The purpose of this study is to obtain psychological response and user preference information on the use of the T jet® device versus the traditional subcutaneous injection administration of Tev Tropin®.

This study will compare subject-reported injection anxiety immediately before the administration of each dose of Tev-Tropin® between a needle-syringe injection method and a needle-free injection method (T-jet®)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5-point FIS immediately before administration. A higher score denoted greater anxiety.

The injection anxiety score was to be reported by the subject from a row of five faces with values ranging from 5 (the face with the most negative affect) to 1 (the face with the most positive affect).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must require a routine Tev-Tropin® dose that does not exceed 2.5 mg in one injection (0.5 mL) using the dosing schedule individualized for each patient by their prescribing physician
  • Male, age 7-17 years, with the capability to provide assent, as determined by the investigator and/or parent or legal guardian
  • Clinically definite growth hormone deficiency as previously diagnosed by the investigator or other physician
  • Subjects must be using Tev-Tropin® prior to enrollment for 28 days
  • Informed consent signed by parent(s) or legal custodian of patient prior to study entry and patient assent as determined by the investigator and/or subject's parent or legal custodian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than one subcutaneous injection per Tev-Tropin® dose
  • Female gender
  • Use of any other needle-free injection device at any time
  • Current use of another human growth hormone product other than Tev-Tropin®
  • Concurrent treatment with other routine injectable medications
  • History of benign intracranial hypertension
  • Significant communication difficulties, or medical or psychiatric condition, that affects the subject's and/or caregiver's ability to perform the necessary functions to complete the study, or any condition which the investigator in their medical judgment thinks may interfere with participation in the study
  • Use of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Contraindications related to routine use of Tev-Tropin® as per investigators' medical judgment (e.g., subjects with closed epiphyses, active proliferative or severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, active malignancy, acute critical illness, or Prader-Willi syndrome who are severely obese or have severe respiratory impairment)
  • Current participation in another pharmaceutical or device study
  • Previous participation in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tev-Tropin® needle-free
needle-free injection method (T-jet®)for 14 days before cross-over to other arm
Needle-free delivery method for 14 days before cross-over to other arm
Other Names:
  • T-jet®
Active Comparator: Tev-Tropin® by Needle-syringe
needle-syringe injection method for 14 days before cross-over to other arm
comparison of delivery methods for 14 days before cross-over to other arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject-reported Injection Anxiety Immediately Before Administration
Time Frame: 28 days; Period 1: 14 days, Period 2: 14 days
The difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5 point scale immediately before administration, which scale consisted of a row of five faces with values from 1(most positive)to 5(most negative or greater anxiety.) The score is an average of the Period 1 (Days 1-14) and Period 2 (Days 15-28) assessments; like groups were combined and then averaged. There were 3 visits: Visit 1 (Begin Period 1) Screening and Randomized assignment, Visit 2 (first day of Period 2) Cross over to other assignment, Visit 3 End of Study.
28 days; Period 1: 14 days, Period 2: 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject-reported Injection Pain Immediately Following Administration.
Time Frame: 28 days; Period 1: 14 days, Period 2: 14 days
The difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5 point scale immediately before administration, which scale consisted of a row of five faces with values from 1(most positive)to 5(most negative or greater anxiety.) The score is an average of the Period 1 (Days 1-14) and Period 2 (Days 15-28) assessments; like groups were combined and then averaged. There were 3 visits: Visit 1 (Begin Period 1) Screening and Randomized assignment, Visit 2 (first day of Period 2) Cross over to other assignment, Visit 3 End of Study.
28 days; Period 1: 14 days, Period 2: 14 days
Subject or Caregiver Reported Perception of Ease of Preparation as Recorded Weekly on a 5-point Scale.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5 point scale immediately before administration, which scale consisted of a row of five faces with values from 1(most positive)to 5(most negative or greater anxiety.) The score is an average of the Period 1 (Days 1-14) and Period 2 (Days 15-28) assessments; like arms were combined and then averaged. There were 3 visits: Visit 1 (Begin Period 1) Screening and Randomized assignment, Visit 2 (first day of Period 2) Cross over to other assignment, Visit 3 End of Study.
2 weeks
Subject or Caregiver Reported Perception of Ease of Administration as Recorded Weekly on a 5-point Scale.
Time Frame: 28 Days; end of Period 1(14 days) and end of Period 2 (14 days)
The difference in subject-reported overall satisfaction between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5-point scale following the end of each period of the study. The overall satisfaction was to be rated by the subject on a 5-point scale as 1 (Really Unhappy) to 5 (Really Happy), a higher score denoting greater satisfaction. Overall satisfaction is obtained only once at the end of each period; Period 1 Tjet group was added to Period 2 Tjet group and Period 1 syringe group was added to Period 2 syringe group; no averaging was necessary.
28 Days; end of Period 1(14 days) and end of Period 2 (14 days)
Subject-reported Overall Satisfaction Following the End of Each Period of the Study.
Time Frame: 28 Days; end of Period 1(14 days) and end of Period 2 (14 days)
The difference in subject-reported overall satisfaction between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5-point scale following the end of each period of the study. The overall satisfaction was to be rated by the subject on a 5-point scale as 1 (Really Unhappy) to 5 (Really Happy), a higher score denoting greater satisfaction. Overall satisfaction is obtained only once at the end of each period; Period 1 Tjet group was added to Period 2 Tjet group and Period 1 syringe group was added to Period 2 syringe group; no averaging was necessary.
28 Days; end of Period 1(14 days) and end of Period 2 (14 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Thomas Smith, MD, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Growth Hormone Deficiency

Clinical Trials on T-jet® containing TevTropin®

Subscribe