Impact of Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy on Patients' Urinary Dynamics

January 12, 2017 updated by: Lei Li, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Impact of Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy on Patients' Urinary Dynamics: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Radical hysterectomy is an important therapy for early cervical cancer. Disfunction of urinary dynamics is the most common postoperative adverse effects, which had negative impact on patients' quality of life. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) could reserve inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP) innervating bladder, hence improving postoperative urinary dynamics. Furthermore impact of different energy instruments on urinary dynamic isn't clear.

Objectives: This study is to compare urinary dynamics before and after NSRH, and to analyze the difference between BiClamp forcep (BiClamp® forcep, ERBE Elektromedizin, GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) and water jet (ERBEJET®2) about the effects of dissecting IHP.

Study population: Cervical cancer of FIGO IB stage, among which 120 cases are enrolled to randomly allocated to BiClamp group or water jet group.

Intervention: Patients accept NSRH which all will be accomplished by Professor Ming Wu.

Methods: All surgical patients are accessed via urinary dynamics before and four months after NSRH. On the 14th day after surgeries, urinary catheter will be removed and residual urine volume (RUV) will be measured. For patients of RUV > 100 ml, urinary catheter will be replaced.

Primary study endpoint: the successful rate of removing urinary catheter on the 14th day after NSRH.

Secondary study endpoint: urinary dynamics four months after NSRH.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • FIGO stage IB
  • ASA score 0-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgeries
  • ASA score > 2
  • With abnormal urinary dynamics before surgeries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: BiClamp group
BiClamp forcep (BiClamp® forcep, ERBE Elektromedizin, GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) is used to dissect inferior hypogastric plexus
electric energy
Other Names:
  • BiClamp® forcep, ERBE Elektromedizin
Active Comparator: water jet group
water jet (ERBEJET®2, ERBE Elektromedizin, GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) is used to dissect inferior hypogastric plexus
water jet energy
Other Names:
  • ERBEJET®2, ERBE Elektromedizin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
successful rate of removing urinary catheter
Time Frame: 14th day after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
successful rate (%) of removing urinary catheter assessed by residual urine volume less than 100 ml
14th day after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
urinary dynamics parameters determined by urodynamics apparatus: bladder capacity and sensation
Time Frame: four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
bladder capacity and sensation in ml
four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
urinary dynamics parameters determined by urodynamics apparatus: residual urine volume
Time Frame: four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
residual urine volume in ml
four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
urinary dynamics parameters determined by urodynamics apparatus: urine flow rate
Time Frame: four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
urine flow rate in ml/s
four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
urinary dynamics parameters determined by urodynamics apparatus: bladder pressure
Time Frame: four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
bladder pressure in cmH2O
four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
urinary dynamics parameters determined by urodynamics apparatus: detrusor pressure
Time Frame: four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
detrusor pressure in cmH2O
four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
urinary dynamics parameters determined by urodynamics apparatus: bladder compliance
Time Frame: four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
bladder compliance in ml/cmH2O
four months after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
survival outcomes: ovarall survival
Time Frame: two years after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
overall survival in months
two years after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
survival outcomes: progression-free survival
Time Frame: two years after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
progression-free survival in months
two years after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wu Ming, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PUMCH-OBGYN-2013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared with authorised researchers via online database.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on BiClamp group

Subscribe