Intramedullary Femoral Reaming, Human Study

November 30, 2016 updated by: Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye, Ullevaal University Hospital

Pathophysiological Effects of- and Inflammatory Response to Intramedullary Femoral Nailing in Patients With Femoral Shaft Fracture

To what extent the cardiopulmonary and inflammatory response is affected by initial femoral intramedullary nailing in the already traumatized and inflammatory activated patient was analyzed in the present study with the attention to survey the additional burden of this operative treatment. The patients are monitored with a pulmonary catheter, and blood samples for coagulation, fibrinolysis, complement and cytokine response are withdrawn pre-, per- and postoperatively. The study is partly randomized 1)where delayed intramedullary nailing is compared with primary nailing of the femur, and 2) a new reaming technique (RIA) is compared with a standard reaming technique (TR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To what extent the cardiopulmonary and inflammatory response is affected by initial femoral intramedullary nailing in the already traumatized and inflammatory activated patient was analyzed in the present study with the attention to survey the additional burden of this operative treatment. The patients are monitored with a pulmonary catheter, and blood samples for coagulation, fibrinolysis, complement and cytokine response are withdrawn pre-, per- and postoperatively. The study is partly randomized 1)where delayed intramedullary nailing is compared with primary nailing of the femur, and 2) a new reaming technique (RIA) is compared with a standard reaming technique (TR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0407
        • Orthopedic Center, Ullevål University Hopspital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • femoral shaft fracture suitable for intramedullary nailing
  • < 24 hours postinjury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous fracture of the femur
  • pathological fracture
  • femur deformities
  • pregnancy
  • previous intramedullary nailing or external fixation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1) IMN and EF/IMN

Two parts of the study are randomized;

1)initial intramedullary reaming and primary external fixation with secondary intramedullary nailing

in one group intramedullary reaming and nailing is performed immediately, femoral fractures in the second group are external fixated and than secondary nailed.
Active Comparator: 2) TR and RIA
Two parts of the study are randomized; 2)traditional reaming (TR)is compared to a new reaming device, RIA, which is a reamer connected to suction and flushing for prevention of increased intramedullary pressure
the reaming of the femoral canal is performed with two different reaming devices; a traditional reamer (TR)and the reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
cardiopulmonary alterations
Time Frame: the first three postoperative days
the first three postoperative days
coagulation, fibrinolytic and cytokine response
Time Frame: pre-, per- and first 3 days postoperatively
pre-, per- and first 3 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
fracture healing
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Olav Røise, MD, Orthopedic Centre, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2002

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Clinical Trials on the effect of delayed intramedullary reaming

3
Subscribe