EcoAnaesthesia Facemask Versus Standard Facemask During Anesthesia Induction

April 6, 2017 updated by: University of Louisville

A Comparison of the Efficiency of the New EcoAnaesthesia Facemask With a Standard Facemask During Induction of Anesthesia

This study will evaluate the efficiency of the EcoAnesthesia mask and its advantages over the standard facemask used in our practice. The satisfaction by the anesthesia provider and its ease of use may change the standard practice in airway management. In addition to these additional effects on patient safety, the facemask is affordable and may reduce the environmental burden of anesthesia waste.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status class 1-2
  • Undergoing elective surgery
  • Aged between 18 and 75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe acute or chronic lung disease requiring oxygen-therapy;
  • Hiatus hernia with gastro-esophageal reflux or other esophageal or gastric abnormalities that require a rapid sequence induction;
  • Food intake within the last 6 hours or clear fluid intake within 2 hours prior to surgery;
  • Ischemic or congenital heart disease;
  • Pregnancy (confirmed by a pregnancy test);
  • Patient is scheduled for regional anesthesia and denies conductance of general anesthesia during the surgical procedure;
  • Known difficult intubation in the past.
  • Difficult Mask Ventilation. Patients having any two of the criteria listed below will be Categorized as "Difficult Mask Ventilation (DMV)" (5,13,14) and will be excluded from enrollment. All others will be classified as "Normal." Age > 55 BMI > 26 kg/m2 Lack of teeth Presence of beard History of snoring Limited mandibular protrusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: EcoAnesthesia Mask first
Both the "standard adult facemask" (Portex Adult, USA) and the new facemask (EcoAnesthesia Mask, Intersurgical, Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA) will be tested in each patient for three minutes. The order of usage of each mask will be randomly assigned to each patient. This group will receive the EcoAnesthesia Mask first.
The trial facemask will be used before the standard one.
The standard facemask will be applied after the trial device
Active Comparator: Standard mask first
Both the "standard adult facemask" (Portex Adult, USA) and the new facemask (EcoAnesthesia Mask, Intersurgical, Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA) will be tested in each patient for three minutes. The order of usage of each mask will be randomly assigned to each patient. Patients in this arm will receive the standard mask first.
The standard facemask will be applied before the trial device.
The trial facemask will be used after the standard one.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
End-tidal oxygen concentration
Time Frame: three minutes
End-tidal oxygen concentration after 3 minutes with the mask that the patient was first randomized to use.
three minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum airway pressure
Time Frame: End of 3 minutes with each mask
Maximum airway pressure, which will be necessary to reach a tidal volume of at least 6 ml/kg every minute during the 3 minutes of mask ventilation with each device.
End of 3 minutes with each mask

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UoL IRB 09.0588

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia Induction

Clinical Trials on EcoAnaesthesia facemask first

Subscribe