Clinical Study to Evaluate the Implantation of the ActiGait Drop Foot Stimulator System

August 24, 2021 updated by: Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical procedure involving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and other developed countries and a major source of disability. Prognosis for regaining the ability to walk is good, with 64% of those initially dependent in walking regaining independence by 3 months. However, many gait abnormalities persist. A conservative estimate suggests that 20% of stroke survivors have a drop foot. Drop foot following stroke is caused by paresis of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles. It prevents the patient from effectively swinging the leg during walking, causing an abnormal gait characterized by hip hitching and circumduction and toe catch. Walking speed in people with drop foot is often significantly reduced and the risk of stumbling or falling is high. The conventional treatment for drop foot is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). While AFOs are appropriate for many patients, in certain patient groups AFOs have significant limitations (e.g. in patients with strong spasticity, suffering from pronounced inversion, suffering from volume changes in the lower extremity, etc). An alternative way of treating drop foot is by means of functional electrical stimulation. Clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of drop foot stimulation suggest that it provides many benefits to patients, such as an improved confidence in walking, increased walking speed and endurance, less effort during walking and reduced spasticity. Implantable systems such as ActiGait are considered therapeutic alternatives specifically for those patients for whom conventional treatments have failed. ActiGait system consists of an external module (antenna and control module), a foot switch transmitting to the external module and an implanted assembly (receiver, pulse train generator, electrodes). The objective of this study is to obtain additional evidence on safety of ActiGait implantation procedure and on its efficacy. The study will enrol 5 subjects that will be implanted and followed for 12 weeks. Efficacy outcomes will be assessed at the baseline and during two follow-up visits (week 6 and 12). Subjects will be asked to walk with and without their preferred walking at the baseline and with and without stimulation at follow-up visits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have a single sided hemiparesis persisting for more than 6 months due to a cerebro-vascular accident (CVA).
  • be fully grown-up.
  • have the ability to walk 20 meters in less than 2 minutes with or without walking aid but without the help of another person.
  • have a reduced speed of walking.
  • have the ability to stand upright with both heels touching the floor while hip and knee are in neutral position.
  • have a passive range of movement of the affected ankle joint of at least 30 degrees.
  • have a positive response to surface electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve - i.e. muscle contraction which results in dorsiflexion of the ankle and improved gait.
  • male or female older than 18 years of age.
  • have signed written Informed consent to participate in the study.
  • is willing and able to follow all study procedures including attendance at clinics for scheduled study visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • peripheral nerve damage of the affected leg.
  • severe or uncontrolled diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement.
  • poor skin condition on the affected leg.
  • a thickness of subcutaneous fat exceeding 3.5 cm in the region of the implant.
  • inability to walk 100 meters without stopping prior to CVA (with or without a walking aid, but without the help of another person).
  • poorly controlled epilepsy.
  • need of Ankle Foot Orthosis (AOF) to maintain ankle stability.
  • concomitant medical and psychological conditions which would limit the success of the ActiGait® system such as: active degenerative diseases of the back and lower limbs, visuo-spatial neglect, or drug abuse, personality disorders or poor cognitive function.
  • concomitant medical and psychological conditions which would compromise the safety of the patient in connection with the implantation and use of the ActiGait system, such as: severe cardiac disease, uncontrolled hypertension or history of malignancy within the preceding five years.
  • other active implanted devices such as demand pacemakers or implanted defibrillators, as mutual electromagnetic interference may distort the efficacy of both systems and expose the patient to dangerous situations.
  • history of falls greater than once a week.
  • pregnancy and lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator.
  • previous participation in this study
  • participation in an investigational drug trial within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
  • requirement of an interpreter
  • use of external FES system to assist walking four weeks prior to enrolment
  • MRI of the affected thigh that is inconsistent with safe implantation of the ActiGait
  • history of falls greater than once a week.
  • pregnancy and lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator.
  • previous participation in this study.
  • participation in an investigational drug trial within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
  • requirement of an interpreter.
  • anatomic situation of the common peroneal nerve identified by pre-surgical MRI that could compromise the success of ActiGait).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ActiGait
Receiving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator
ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance Walked in 6 Minutes
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation
The test assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity (endurance). At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation.
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking Speed During 10 Meter Gait Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation
The test assesses walking speed in meters per second over a short duration. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation.
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Score
Time Frame: Baseline,12 weeks post-implantation
A semi-structured interview is conducted in order to identify subject's limitations with daily occupations of importance in categories self-care, productivtiy or leisure. The subject is then asked to rate the imporance of each of the occupations using a 10-point rating scale. Afterwards the subject chooses up to 5 of the most important occupations (problems) (basis for identifying intervention goals). The subject is asked to use a 10 point scale to rate level of performance and satisfaction with performance for each of the five identified problems. Average COPM performance score and satisfaction score are calculated. The scores range between 1 and 10, where 1 indicates poor performance and low satisfaction, respectively, while 10 indicates very good performance and high satisfaction.
Baseline,12 weeks post-implantation
Four Square Step Test (FSST)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 post-implantation
It is a test of dynamic balance that clinically assesses the person's ability to step over objects forward, sideways, and backwards. The patient's time to perform the test is measured which shorter time representing better performance. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 12 weeks post-implantation it was done with and without stimulation.
Baseline, week 12 post-implantation
Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Peroneal Nerve
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 post-implantation
Measured: Nervus peroneus communis (CPN) and Nervus peroneus superficialis (SPN)
Baseline, week 12 post-implantation
Change in MRI of Affected Leg and Implant Post-implantation
Time Frame: Week 2 post-implantation

MRI will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the implant on the common peroneal nerve (e.g. positioning of the nerve cuff along the nerve, path of the lead wire and the common peroneal nerve, estimation of the cross-sectional area of the common peroneal nerve compared to the pre-operative MRI recording, etc.).

The outcome will be quantified by surgeon's judgement whether the final implant position is consistent with safe application of the ActiGait® implant as described in the manufacturer's surgical manual. Number of safe and successful implantations will be counted.

Week 2 post-implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Liebetanz, MD, Medical University Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany
  • Principal Investigator: Veit Rhode, MD, Medical University Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PB-SA844-100

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on ActiGait

3
Subscribe