REWORD-HF REverse WOrsening Renal Function in Decompensated Heart Failure (REWORD-HF)

April 7, 2017 updated by: Niguarda Hospital

Impact of Different Therapeutic Approaches in Patients With Cardiorenal Syndrome in the Setting of Acute Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure (ADCHF)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether in patients with acute decompensated congestive heart failure and the cardiorenal syndrome, i.e. a state in which therapy directed to improve symptoms is limited by further worsening renal function, fluid removal by ultrafiltration is superior to different pharmacological approaches in acutely relieving congestion and preventing further deterioration in renal function and whether it results in longer admission-free survival 90 days after enrolment

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute decompensated congestive heart failure (ADCHF), the most common single cause of hospitalization over 65 years, results in 4-8% in-hospital mortality and 30-38% incidence of readmissions within 3 months after discharge. While fluid accumulation remains the main factor causing hospitalization, impaired cardiac output in ADHF causes renal arterial underfilling and increased venous pressure, reducing the glomerular filtration rate and causing acute kidney injury.

Aggressive therapy is required to alleviate volume overload during hospital admission and achievement of a dry weight is capital in preventing rehospitalisation. Currently diuretics are considered the standard of care for volume overload in ADHF, yet any patients, especially those with advanced HF become soon resistant to standard doses of loop diuretics, so escalating doses and the association of thiazides are often required to achieve effective diuresis, an approach that will progressively worsen renal function, causing the cardiorenal syndrome.

When diuretic resistance develops and symptoms persists, mechanical fluid removal via ultrafiltration should be considered. Ultrafiltration is an alternative method of sodium and water removal, that filters plasma water directly across a semipermeable membrane in response to a transmembrane pressure gradient, resulting in an ultrafiltrate that is isoosmotic compared with plasma water, In view of the limits of traditional therapies for the treatment of congestion and concomitant progressive renal dysfunction in ADHF patients, there is a compelling need for additional studies to individuate the better method for fluid removal in volume-overloaded patients and guide management decisions to reduce associated morbidity.

The main objectives of the present project are to evaluate whether in patients with acute decompensated congestive heart failure and the cardiorenal syndrome, i.e. a state in which therapy directed to improve CHF symptoms is limited by further worsening renal function, fluid removal by ultrafiltration is superior to different pharmacological approaches in acutely relieving congestion and preventing further deterioration in renal function and whether it results in longer admission-free survival 90 days after enrolment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ancona, Italy, 60020
        • Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona Cardiology Presidio Lancisi
      • Bergamo, Italy, 24128
        • Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo - Cardiovascular Medicine
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi - Cardiology Unit
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi - Nefrology,Dialysis and Hypertension Unit
      • Como, Italy, 22100
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna - Cardiology
      • Cosenza, Italy, 87100
        • Ospedale SS Annunziata Cardiology
      • Cremona, Italy, 26100
        • Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona Cardiology
      • Milano, Italy, 20138
        • Centro Cardiologico Monzino, I.R.C.C.S. Cardiology Intensive Care
      • Milano, Italy, 20162
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda - Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Program
      • Piacenza, Italy, 29100
        • Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto Cardiology Department
      • Verona, Italy, 37126
        • AO Verona Ospedale Civile Maggiore Cardiology Unit
    • Bari
      • Cassano Murge, Bari, Italy
        • Fondazione S. Maugeri. IRCCS Istituto di Cassano Murge
    • Milano
      • Legnano, Milano, Italy, 20025
        • Ospedale Civile di Legnano Cardiology
      • Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas - IRCCS Clinical Cardiology Cardiovascular Department
    • Monza Brianza
      • Monza, Monza Brianza, Italy, 20052
        • Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathy Clinic
      • Monza, Monza Brianza, Italy, 20052
        • Gruppo Policlinico di Monza Clinical Cardiology and Heart Failure Unit - Cardiology Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

On admission (screening)

  • Informed consent
  • Age 18-80 years
  • NYHA class III - IV
  • Signs of pulmonary (pulmonary rales, and interstitial oedema or pleural effusion on chest Xray) and/or systemic congestion (pitting ankle oedema and enlarged liver or ascites and neck vein distension ≥ 7 cm) and weight gain ≥ 2 kg during the previous week
  • Glomerular filtration rate ≥ 30 ml/min
  • BNP increased >400 pg/ml (diagnostic cut-off for ADCHF), as confirmatory diagnostic test)

    24 hours after admission (randomization)

  • Persistent signs of pulmonary (pulmonary rales, interstitial oedema or pleural effusion on chest Xray) and/or systemic congestion (ankle oedema, enlarged liver or ascites, neck vein distension ≥ 7 cm)
  • Serum creatinine or urine output criteria indicative of modified RIFLE (AKI: risk) class at least 1 (increase x 1.5 in serum creatinine or decrease > 25% in GFR or urine output < 0.5 ml/Kg/h for more than 6 hours) 29-30 during diuretic infusion

Exclusion criteria

  • Chronic kidney disease stage 4-5 (GFR < 30 ml/min)
  • Acute coronary syndromes
  • Systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg/need for intravenous inotropes
  • Hematocrit > 45%
  • Unattainable venous access
  • Contraindications to anticoagulation by heparin
  • Systemic infection
  • Heart transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Infusional drug treatment
Diuretics or diuretics plus fixed low dose dopamine infusion

Patients randomized to pharmacological treatment receive

  • either intravenous diuretics at escalating doses up to 20 mg/h
  • or intravenous diuretics up to 20 mg/h and dopamine infusion at a constant rate of 3 mcg/Kg/m.
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrafiltration
Device: Ultrafiltration appliance Sessions of 8 h UF are conducted on 2 subsequent days in the first 48 hours after randomization; a third session is performed on day 3 in case of persistent congestion

All loop diuretics will be discontinued. Rate of fluid removal will be based on the extent of fluid overload as assessed by increase in body weight vs the patient's known dry weight

  • less than 3 kg 200 ml/h
  • more than 3 kg and less than 5 kg 300 mlh
  • more than 5 kg 500 mlh

Criteria for achievement of target UF goals are removal of > 50% and <70% of fluid excess based on the estimated increase in body weight Diuretic infusion is allowed provided that a minimum of 3 hours after the end of the UF session have elapsed, at a maximum cumulative dose of 100 mg furosemide, till start of the next UF session The use of inotropic agents is prohibited

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in a composite clinical-lab score
Time Frame: Baseline and 96 h after randomization,precisely:48 h after end of the last UF session in the intervention arm;24 h after end of 72 h infusional drug treatment in the control arm
Changes in a score derived by summing up changes in dyspnea, weight loss, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Baseline and 96 h after randomization,precisely:48 h after end of the last UF session in the intervention arm;24 h after end of 72 h infusional drug treatment in the control arm

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the dyspnea Likert scale
Time Frame: Measured at day 4, at day 10, at day 90 vs baseline
Measured at day 4, at day 10, at day 90 vs baseline
Changes in modified RIFLE (AKIN) stage
Time Frame: Measured at day 4 vs baseline
Measured at day 4 vs baseline
Length of stay during index admission
Time Frame: Measured at average day 10
Measured at average day 10
Occurrence of major adverse events
Time Frame: Measured at day 90
All cause mortality, hospital readmission and unscheduled office and emergency department visits for ADCHF
Measured at day 90
Days spent alive and out of hospital (DAOH) within 90 days
Time Frame: Measured at day 90
Sum of days spent alive and out of hospital
Measured at day 90
BNP changes
Time Frame: Measured at day 0, at day 4, at 10 and day 90
Changes in BNP at specified times VS baseline
Measured at day 0, at day 4, at 10 and day 90
Changes in neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL)
Time Frame: Measured at day -1, at day 0 and day 4
Changes in NGAL at specified times VS screening
Measured at day -1, at day 0 and day 4
Changes in Cystatin C (CysC)
Time Frame: Measured at day 0, day 4, day 10 and day 90
Changes in Cystatin C (CysC) at specified times VS baseline
Measured at day 0, day 4, day 10 and day 90
Treatment-related adverse events
Time Frame: Measured at day 4
Bleeding, thrombosis, clotting, infection
Measured at day 4
Adverse changes in blood pressure, heart rate and rhythm
Time Frame: Measured at day 4
Hypotension (< 90 mmHg), tachycardia (> 110 bpm) arrhythmias
Measured at day 4
Adverse changes in lab parameters
Time Frame: Measured at day 4
Hyper-Azotemia (>180 mg/dl), hyper-kaliemia (6.5 mEq/l), hemoconcentration (hematocrit >45%)
Measured at day 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Antonio Santoro, MD, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Furosemide or Furosemide and Dopamine

3
Subscribe