Transfusion of Fresh Frozen Plasma in Non-bleeding Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients (TOPIC)

Transfusion of Fresh Frozen Plasma in Non-bleeding ICU Patients

With the aim to restrict inappropriate fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions to critically ill patients, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted in a subgroup of intensive care (ICU) patients undergoing an invasive procedure. The objective is to assess the effectiveness and costs of omitting prophylactic FFP transfusion compared to current practice of prophylactic transfusion, in non-bleeding ICU patients with a coagulopathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is an effective therapy to correct for a deficiency of multiple coagulation factors during bleeding. In past years, use of FFP has increased, in particular in patients on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and has expanded to include prophylactic use in patients with a coagulopathy prior to undergoing an invasive procedure. Retrospective studies suggest that prophylactic use of FFP does not prevent bleeding, but carries the risk of transfusion-related morbidity. However, up to 50% of FFP is administered to non-bleeding ICU patients.

Objective: With the aim to restrict inappropriate FFP transfusions to critically ill patients, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted in a subgroup of ICU patients with a coagulopathy undergoing an invasive procedure. The objective is to assess the effectiveness and costs of prophylactic FFP transfusion (current practice) compared to no prophylactic transfusion, in non-bleeding ICU patients with a coagulopathy, prior to undergoing an invasive procedure (e.g. placement of central venous catheter, tracheostomy, chest tube).

Study design: Prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation (PROBE) design.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academic Medical Centre - University of Amsterdam
      • Hilversum, Netherlands, 1231 XZ
        • Ter Gooi Ziekenhuizen
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 XZ
        • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3582 KE
        • Diakonessenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • INR >1.5 and <3.0
  • undergoing invasive procedure (insertion of a central venous catheter, a chest drain, percutaneous tracheostomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • clinically overt bleeding at the time of the procedure (excludes minor epistaxis, minor gum bleeding, microscopic hematuria, superficial bruises, or normal menses)
  • thrombocytopenia of < 30 x 109/L.
  • use of abciximab, tirofiban, ticlopidine or activated protein C
  • use of heparin < 1 hour prior to the procedure, or low molecular weight heparin in therapeutic doses < 12 hours prior to procedure
  • history of congenital or acquired coagulation factor deficiency or bleeding diathesis
  • no informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: No FFP transfusion prior to intervention
Patients with a coagulopathy (INR 1,5-3,0), who are randomized to omitting transfusion of fresh frozen plasma before they undergo an intervention.
In the interventional group FFP transfusion is omitted before performing a procedure (e.g. placement of central venous catheter, tracheostomy, chest tube)
No Intervention: FFP transfusion prior to intervention
Patients with a coagulopathy (INR 1,5-3,0), who are randomized to transfusion of fresh frozen plasma before they undergo an intervention. This is considered standard care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure-related relevant bleeding, occurring within 24 hours after the procedure.
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure

Relevant bleeding will be defined using a validated tool for assessment of bleeding in the critically ill.

An assessment of bleeding will be standardized and performed by an independent research physician or intensivist blinded to the transfusion strategy 1 and 24 hours after the procedure and when clinically indicated.

24 hours after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
minor bleeding within 24 hours
Time Frame: within 24 hours of the procedure
within 24 hours of the procedure
onset of acute lung injury within 48 hours.
Time Frame: 48 hours within the intervention
Lung injury will be evaluated by P/F ratio, change in ventilator settings, chest x-ray and Lung Injury Score.
48 hours within the intervention
effect of FFP transfusion on coagulation parameters
Time Frame: within 24 hours of transfusion of FFP
a range of coagulation parameters will be evaluated to assess efficacy of FFP transfusion in these patients
within 24 hours of transfusion of FFP
evaluation of costs
Time Frame: up to 28 days after inclusion
Evaluation of costs in the two different groups will be made. Length of stay, number of ventilation days, differences in medication use, all will be taken into account.
up to 28 days after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole P Juffermans, MD, PhD, Academic Medical Centre - University of Amsterdam

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2013

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhage

3
Subscribe