A Test of the Effectiveness of a Device and Distraction for Pediatric Immunization Pain

June 21, 2011 updated by: MMJ Labs LLC

Phase II Study of the Effectiveness of a Device and Distraction for Pediatric Immunization Pain in Multiple Age Groups

The hypothesis of this study is that distraction cards used by the caretaker along with a vibrating cold pack placed proximal to the site of immunization will decrease the pain of routine pediatric immunizations when compared to a placebo device or standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Needle pain is the most common and the most feared source of childhood pain, resulting in needle phobia for 10$ of adults. Current standard of care for immunizations in the US is no pain relief. An inexpensive, immediately effective form of needle pain control could reduce needle phobia or vaccine refusal in the long term if demonstrated to be effective for immunization pain.

Distraction can decrease procedural distress in children by 50%. The effect of using a multi-modal pain and distraction relieving approach has not been rigorously studied.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

345

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children receiving routine immunizations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no caregiver present
  • chronic illness requiring frequent injections
  • clear cognitive impairments affecting communication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard Care
Immunizations are given with standard care of no pain control
Active Comparator: Experimental
Vibrating device with cold pack held to arm proximal to injections within the same dermatome; caretakers offered and instructed in use of distraction cards.
"Buzzy", the vibrating cold pack, is held in place with a velcro strap or pressed by caretaker or nurse immediately prior and during immunizations. The vibration is activated and the device remains in place during the shot, moving locations if multiple shots are given. Distraction cards with pictures on one side and questions on the other are shown to the child while the caretaker asks the finding and seeking questions on the back.
Other Names:
  • Buzzy(R)
  • Flippits(TM)
Sham Comparator: Sham Device
The device without batteries or cold pack held to arm proximal to injections. No formal distraction.
The identical device without batteries or a cold pack is held in place proximal to the site with a velcro strap or pressed by parent or nurse immediately prior to immunizations. The device remains in place throughout the procedure, moving locations to complete multiple shots.
Other Names:
  • Buzzy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain of immunization
Time Frame: 5 minutes during or immediately after immunizations
Infants' and toddlers' pain is assessed by coding videotapes using the FLACC (face, legs, activity, crying and consolability) scale. Patients age 4 and older rate pain using self-report via the Faces Pain Scale Revised.
5 minutes during or immediately after immunizations

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain from immunization using observational measures
Time Frame: 5 minutes immediately following immunization
Caretakers and nurses administering the shots rate pain using a 10cm Visual analog scale from "no pain" to "most pain possible"; duration of infant cry is also assessed following the procedure using coded videotape recordings.
5 minutes immediately following immunization
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 5 minutes after immunizations
10 item scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" with ten parameters of satisfaction with the methods and concepts of immunization.
5 minutes after immunizations

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy Baxter, MD, MMJ Labs LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 22, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H09501
  • R44HD056647-01A2 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Procedural Pain

Clinical Trials on Device: Buzzy

Subscribe