Prediction Frozen Shoulder Validation

July 2, 2010 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Determining Shoulder Kinematics in the Prediction of Progress of Frozen Shoulder Syndrome: a Prediction Method, Validation of the Method, and Clinical Application

Background: Few studies have examined the predictors of the clinical course of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome or explained the persistence of symptoms after appropriate therapy. Altered shoulder kinematics may predispose subjects to subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tendonitis, altered shoulder joint forces, and possible degenerative changes. Subsequently, a more difficult and chronic course of frozen shoulder syndrome may develop.

Objective: The purposes of this study are: (1) to develop a prediction method for determining altered shoulder kinematics and associated muscular activities which are associated with the chronicity of frozen shoulder dysfunction, and (2) to validate this prediction method and analyze the impact of the method on clinical behavior.

Design: For the first year, a prospective study will be conducted to develop a prediction method that will identify impaired shoulder kinematics associated with the degree of symptom-related functional disability in patients with frozen shoulder syndrome. For the second and third years, validation of the proposed prediction method will determine whether altered shoulder kinematics and associated muscular activities subject to intervention meet the prediction criteria and demonstrate improvement in their follow-up, which will be shown to improve decision making in clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 50% loss of passive movement of the shoulder joint relative to the nonaffected side, in 1 or more of 3 movement directions (i.e., forward flexion, abduction in the frontal plane, or external rotation in 0° of abduction);
  • 13-15 and duration of complaints of at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of stroke with residual upper-extremity involvement,
  • diabetes mellitus,
  • rheumatoid arthritis,
  • rotator cuff tear,
  • surgical stabilization of the shoulder,
  • osteoporosis, or
  • malignancies in the shoulder region.
  • subjects who had pain or disorders of the cervical spine, elbow, wrist, or hand, or who had pain radiating from the shoulder to the arm, were also excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: intervention group
intervention group: end-range mobilization/scapular mobilization treatment approach group
end-range mobilization/scapular mobilization treatment approach
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: control
passive mobilization, stretching techniques, physical modalities (i.e., ultrasound, shortwave diathermy, and/or electrotherapy), and active exercises
SHAM_COMPARATOR: control-criteria group
passive mobilization, stretching techniques, physical modalities (i.e., ultrasound, shortwave diathermy, and/or electrotherapy), and active exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: pre 4 weeks 8 weeks
pre 4 weeks 8 weeks
Disability assessment
Time Frame: pre 4 weeks 8 weeks
pre 4 weeks 8 weeks
Shoulder complex kinematics
Time Frame: pre 4 weeks 8 weeks
pre 4 weeks 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: jiu-jenq Lin, PhD, School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 5, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2010

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 200612088R

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frozen Shoulder

Subscribe