A Study of the Effects of Physiotherapy to Prevent Pelvic Organ Prolapse (PREVPROL)

March 16, 2015 updated by: Ms Suzanne Hagen, Glasgow Caledonian University

A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Prevent Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women

Pelvic organ prolapse is a problem experienced by women where a bulge comes down in the vagina, and may even drop down outside the vagina. The bulge in the vagina is caused by other organs moving down from their normal position in the pelvis and pushing into the vagina. This is a very common problem and many women who have given birth will have a very mild bulge which does not cause them symptoms. Women can however experience a variety of pelvic, bladder, bowel and sexual symptoms which impact on daily life. No research studies have properly examined whether or not exercises can prevent prolapse. This study aims to explore whether exercises taught by a physiotherapist can prevent women developing a prolapse which requires them to have treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

337

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dunedin, New Zealand, 9054
        • Dunedin School of Medicine
    • Aberdeenshire
      • Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, United Kingdom, AB25 2ZN
        • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
    • Birmingham
      • Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2TG
        • Birmingham Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Women involved in the ProLong study who:

  • have some evidence of vaginal laxity in any compartment (POP-Q stage I, II or III)
  • have had no previous treatment for prolapse (surgery, pessary, PFMT)

Women must be willing to participate in the Trial and to comply with their group allocation.

Exclusion Criteria:

Women:

  • with stage 0 or IV prolapse
  • who have had previous incontinence surgery (except mid-urethral sling operation)
  • who have had previous formal instruction in PFMT for any diagnosis in preceding five years
  • who are pregnant, or delivered a baby within the last six months
  • who are unable to comply with PFMT treatment
  • who are unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Physiotherapy

Women allocated to the intervention group will have five appointments with a specialist women's health physiotherapist (intervention physiotherapist) over 16 weeks who will prescribe a daily exercise programme and provide a Lifestyle Advice Sheet (focusing on weight loss, constipation, avoidance of heavy lifting, coughing and high-impact exercise) and relevant tailored advice (phase 1).

Thereafter women in the intervention group will be offered Pilates-based classes, including PFMT, as maintenance (phase 2). Classes will be led by a physiotherapist who has undertaken Pilates training and will take place in six week blocks; each woman will be offered two six week blocks over a year. An exercise DVD will be provided for home use. Each woman will be offered a one-to-one review physiotherapy appointment at one and two years after randomisation.

NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Women allocated to the Control group will only receive, by post, the same Lifestyle Advice Sheet as the intervention group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic organ prolapse symptom score (POP-SS)
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
A summation of responses to seven prolapse symptom questions (range 0-28)
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Pelvic organ prolapse symptom score (POP-SS)
Time Frame: 1 Year post randomisation
A summation of responses to seven prolapse symptom questions (range 0-28)
1 Year post randomisation
Pelvic organ prolapse symptom score (POP-SS)
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
A summation of responses to seven prolapse symptom questions (range 0-28)
2 years post randomisation
Pelvic organ prolapse symptom score (POP-SS)
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
A summation of responses to seven prolapse symptom questions (range 0-28)
3 years post randomisation
Pelvic organ prolapse symptom score (POP-SS)
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
A summation of responses to seven prolapse symptom questions (range 0-28)
4 years post randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prolapse-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Single item scored 0 to 10
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Prolapse severity
Time Frame: Four years post randomisation
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessment
Four years post randomisation
Lifestyle changes
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
1 year post randomisation
Urinary symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
ICIQ urinary incontinence short-form
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Bowel symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
ICIQ bowel symptoms module
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Sexual symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
General health status
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
SF-12
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Need for prolapse treatment
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
1 year post randomisation
The average number of days of prolapse symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Baseline (prior to randomisation)
Prolapse-related quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
Single item scored 0 to 10
1 year post randomisation
Prolapse-related quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
Single item scored 0 to 10
2 years post randomisation
Prolapse-related quality of life
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
Single item scored 0 to 10
3 years post randomisation
Prolapse-related quality of life
Time Frame: 4 years post of randomisation
Single item scored 0 to 10
4 years post of randomisation
Lifestyle changes
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
2 years post randomisation
Lifestyle changes
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
3 years post randomisation
Lifestyle changes
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
4 years post randomisation
Urinary symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
ICIQ urinary incontinence short-form
1 year post randomisation
Urinary symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
ICIQ urinary incontinence short-form
2 years post randomisation
Urinary symptoms
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
ICIQ urinary incontinence short-form
3 years post randomisation
Urinary symptoms
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
ICIQ urinary incontinence short-form
4 years post randomisation
Bowel symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
ICIQ bowel symptoms module
1 year post randomisation
Bowel symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
ICIQ bowel symptoms module
2 years post randomisation
Bowel symptoms
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
ICIQ bowel symptoms module
3 years post randomisation
Bowel symptoms
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
ICIQ bowel symptoms module
4 years post randomisation
Sexual symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
1 year post randomisation
Sexual symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
2 years post randomisation
Sexual symptoms
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
3 years post randomisation
Sexual symptoms
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
4 years post randomisation
General health status
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
1 year post randomisation
General health status
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
2 years post randomisation
General health status
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
3 years post randomisation
General health status
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire - PISQ 12
4 years post randomisation
Need for prolapse treatment
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
2 years post randomisation
Need for prolapse treatment
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
3 years post randomisation
Need for prolapse treatment
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
4 years post randomisation
The average number of days of prolapse symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year post randomisation
1 year post randomisation
The average number of days of prolapse symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years post randomisation
2 years post randomisation
The average number of days of prolapse symptoms
Time Frame: 3 years post randomisation
3 years post randomisation
The average number of days of prolapse symptoms
Time Frame: 4 years post randomisation
4 years post randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof Hagen, PhD MSc BSc CStat CSci, NMAHP Research Unit

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 17, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Muscle training

Subscribe