Cost-effectiveness of PCI With Taxus vs CABG - 5 Years FUP

July 16, 2014 updated by: Mariann Gyongyosi, Medical University of Vienna

Cost-effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS Stents in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery 5 Years After Intervention

The objective of the present study is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using TAXUS stents compared to the costs of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in the first 5 years and then 10 years after intervention. Multivessel PCI or CABG was performed in 114 or 93 patients, respectively. Clinical outcomes, in terms of incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all-cause death, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke, resource use and costs are analyzed prospectively over a 5 and 10-year follow-up (FUP) period. Overall costs consist of the baseline costs of the index procedure (PCI or CABG), clinical and angiographic procedure-related treatments during the entire FUP. The primary endpoint is cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness, defined as the reduction of the composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna, Dept. of Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients, treated with multivessel disease requiring revascularization were consecutively included in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • two or three-vessel disease requiring percutaneous or surgical multivessel intervention with the aim of complete revascularization
  • age > 18 years
  • clinical symptoms (stable or unstable angina) or signs of myocardial ischemia
  • ≥ 50% diameter stenosis of each lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute myocardial infarction (< 48 h);
  • contraindications to clopidogrel, aspirin, heparin and taxol;
  • pregnancy or lack of protection against pregnancy or breast-feeding during the study;
  • hemorrhagic diathesis and platelet count <100.000/ml3

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PCI
invasive treatment of coronary artery disease
CABG
invasive treatment of coronary artery disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus stents compared to CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Time Frame: in-hospital phase (up to 3 weeks)
in-hospital phase (up to 3 weeks)
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus stents compared to CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus stents compared to CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus stents compared to CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus stents compared to CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Occurrence of MACCE, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Rate of target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Occurrence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Occurrence of cardiac death
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Calculation of the total costs
Time Frame: in-hospital phase (up to 3 weeks)
in-hospital phase (up to 3 weeks)
Occurrence of MACCE, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Occurrence of MACCE, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Occurrence of MACCE, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years
Rate of target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Rate of target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Rate of target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years
Occurrence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Occurrence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Occurrence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years
Occurrence of cardiac death
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Occurrence of cardiac death
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Occurrence of cardiac death
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years
Calculation of the total costs
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Calculation of the total costs
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Calculation of the total costs
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Calculation of the total costs
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on comparison of PCI vs. CABG in multivessel disease

Subscribe