SGI-110 in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

December 27, 2024 updated by: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Phase 1-2, Dose Escalation, Multicenter Study of Two Subcutaneous Regimens of SGI-110, a DNA Hypomethylating Agent, in Subjects With Intermediate or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

Phase 1-2 dose-escalation randomized study in participants with intermediate or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The Dose Escalation Segment will evaluate the biological activity, preliminary safety and efficacy of SGI-110 with two dosing schedules in MDS and AML participants while the Dose Expansion Segment will further evaluate safety and efficacy at the biological effective dose (BED) or maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as defined in the Dose Escalation Segment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Once the biologically effective dose (BED) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined in the Dose Escalation Segment, the Dose Expansion Segment will randomize participants with MDS, treatment naïve elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and relapsed/refractory AML participants to receive the BED or MTD dose. Relapsed/refractory AML participants may also receive SGI-110 on a daily x 10 schedule based on the total dose per cycle evaluated in the Dose-escalation Segment using the 5-daily regimen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

414

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale University
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916
        • Florida Cancer Specialists - South
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33705
        • Florida Cancer Specialists - North
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Cancer Center
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Cornell University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
        • Temple University
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Tennessee Oncology
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men or women, 18 years of age or older, with a confirmed diagnosis of international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) intermediate-1, intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS including Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) or AML.

    • In the Dose Escalation Segment, participants who are refractory, relapsed, or unresponsive to standard treatment.
    • In the Dose Expansion Segment, hypomethylating agent (HMA) treatment-naïve MDS participants (including CMML), and intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS participant (including CMML) relapsed or refractory to prior HMA treatment are allowed, and treatment-naïve AML participants who is at least 65 years of age will be allowed if they also have at least one of the following criteria

      • AML secondary to MDS, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy
      • poor cytogenetics
      • pre-existing clinically significant dysfunction of the heart or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
      • poor performance status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), of 2
  2. Eastern ECOG performance status of 0 to 2.
  3. Adequate organ function.
  4. Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant, no evidence of active graft-versus host disease (GVHD) and must be ≥ 2 weeks off immunosuppressive therapy.
  5. No major surgery within 4 weeks of first dose of SGI-110.
  6. No chemotherapy within 2 weeks of first dose of SGI-110 (minimum of 6 weeks for nitrosoureas and 8 weeks for bone marrow transplantation) with the exception of hydroxyurea which will be allowed during course 1 of treatment.
  7. Sign an approved informed consent form for this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. In the Dose Expansion Segment, which includes the 10-day regimen, participants who have received 2 complete full dose cycles or more of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) decitabine or azacitidine (except for intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS participant (including CMML) relapsed or refractory to prior HMA treatment).
  2. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3 classification).
  3. Prior malignancy, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer from which the participant has been disease free for at least 3 years.
  4. Life-threatening illnesses other than AML or MDS, uncontrolled medical conditions or organ system dysfunction which, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the participant's safety, or put the study outcomes at risk.
  5. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV).
  6. Hypersensitivity to decitabine, SGI-110, or SGI-110 excipients.
  7. With the exception of treatment-naïve elderly AML participants, participants with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary heart disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 50% are excluded, symptomatic or uncontrolled arrhythmias or on continuous corticosteroids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose Escalation: Regimen 1 - Guadecitabine 3 mg/m^2 Daily
Participants received starting dose of guadecitabine 3 milligrams per meter square (mg/m^2), subcutaneously (SC), daily from Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle. The dose was subsequently increased to 9, 18, 36, 60, 90, 125 mg/m^2 for subsequent cycles until development of toxicity or disease progression.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Escalation: Regimen 2A - Guadecitabine 6 mg/m^2 Once Weekly
Participants received starting dose of guadecitabine 6 mg/m^2, SC, once weekly on Days 1, 8 and 15, of a 28-day cycle. The dose was subsequently increased to 18, 36, 60, 90, 125 mg/m^2 for subsequent cycles until development of toxicity or disease progression.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Escalation: Regimen 2B - Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 Twice Weekly
Participants received starting dose of guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15 and 18, of a 28-day cycle. The dose was subsequently increased to 90 mg/m^2 for subsequent cycles until development of toxicity or disease progression.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: r/r AML Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, daily, from Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with diagnosis relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: r/r AML Guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2, SC, daily, from Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of r/r AML.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: r/r AML Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 (10-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, daily from Days 1-5 and 8-12, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of r/r AML.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: TN AML Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, daily from Days 1-5, SC of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of treatment naïve (TN) AML.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: TN AML Guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2, SC, daily, from Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of TN AML.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: TN AML Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 (10-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, daily from Days 1-5 and 8-12, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of TN AML.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: r/r MDS Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, daily on Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of r/r Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: r/r MDS Guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2, SC, daily on Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of r/r MDS.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: TN MDS Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, daily on Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of TN MDS.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110
Experimental: Dose Expansion: TN MDS Guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2 (5-Day)
Participants received guadecitabine 90 mg/m^2, SC daily on Days 1-5, of a 28-day cycle in participants with a diagnosis of TN MDS.
Subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • SGI-110

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose Escalation Phase- Biological Effective Dose (BED): Percent Change From Baseline in DNA Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element-1 (LINE-1) Demethylation
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 8
DNA LINE-1 demethylation is defined as the largest percent decrease from baseline in methylation values within a participant between Day 8 and Day 22 of the first treatment cycle. BED was assessed based on DNA LINE-1 demethylation results and defined as the smallest dose that achieves the maximum biological pharmacodynamic (PD) effect (LINE-1 demethylation) in at least 3 successive dose levels.
Cycle 1 Day 8
Dose Escalation Phase- Biological Effective Dose (BED): Percent Change From Baseline in DNA Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element-1 (LINE-1) Demethylation
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 15
DNA LINE-1 demethylation is defined as the largest percent decrease from baseline in methylation values within a participant between Day 8 and Day 22 of the first treatment cycle. BED was assessed based on DNA LINE-1 demethylation results and defined as the smallest dose that achieves the maximum biological pharmacodynamic (PD) effect (LINE-1 demethylation) in at least 3 successive dose levels.
Cycle 1 Day 15
Dose Escalation Phase- Biological Effective Dose (BED): Percent Change From Baseline in DNA Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element-1 (LINE-1) Demethylation
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 22
DNA LINE-1 demethylation is defined as the largest percent decrease from baseline in methylation values within a participant between Day 8 and Day 22 of the first treatment cycle. BED was assessed based on DNA LINE-1 demethylation results and defined as the smallest dose that achieves the maximum biological pharmacodynamic (PD) effect (LINE-1 demethylation) in at least 3 successive dose levels.
Cycle 1 Day 22
Dose Escalation Phase- Biological Effective Dose (BED): Percent Change From Baseline in DNA Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element-1 (LINE-1) Demethylation
Time Frame: Cycle 2 Day 1
DNA LINE-1 demethylation is defined as the largest percent decrease from baseline in methylation values within a participant between Day 8 and Day 22 of the first treatment cycle. BED was assessed based on DNA LINE-1 demethylation results and defined as the smallest dose that achieves the maximum biological pharmacodynamic (PD) effect (LINE-1 demethylation) in at least 3 successive dose levels.
Cycle 2 Day 1
Dose Escalation Phase-Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD): Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Time Frame: From the start of study treatment up to 30 days post treatment (Up to approximately 46 months)
The MTD was defined as the largest dose for which less than 33% of subjects experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of guadecitabine administration at each dose level. DLTs were defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0).
From the start of study treatment up to 30 days post treatment (Up to approximately 46 months)
Dose Expansion (DE) Phase- r/r AML, TN AML: Composite Complete Response (CRc) Rate
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Composite complete response (CRc) rate is defined as the percentage of participants whose best response is complete remission [CR], CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp], or CR with incomplete hematological recovery [CRi]) after treatment with study drug. CR as per AML response criteria is defined as peripheral blood absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.0×10^9/L, Platelets ≥100×10^9/L, independence from red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRp as per AML response criteria is defined as peripheral blood ANC ≥1.0×10^9/L, Platelets <100×10^9/L, independence from RBC transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRi as per AML response criteria is defined as peripheral blood ANC <1.0×10^9/L, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Dose Expansion (DE) Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
ORR is defined as percentage of participants with complete response(CR), partial response(PR), marrow complete response(mCR) and haematological improvement(HI). CR:normal peripheral counts with persistent granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L and normal bone marrow (BM) with persistent marrow blasts ≤5%; persistent dysplasia was noted. PR:normal peripheral counts with granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L and platelet count ≥100 ×10^9/L and normal BM with marrow blasts >5% but were reduced by 50% or more. mCR:reduction of BM blasts to ≤5% without normalization of peripheral counts. HI is divided as erythroid response(HI-E): hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL or red blood cells transfusion independence, platelet response (HI-P): absolute increase of platelet count from <20 to >20×10^9/L and by at least 100%,/if more than 20×10^9/L, by an absolute increase of 30×10^9/L, neutrophil response (HI-N): granulocyte increase ≥100%, and by an absolute increase ≥0.5×10^9/L.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose Escalation Phase: Response Rate in AML Participants
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 23 months)
Response rate for AML participants was assessed by Modified International Working Group (IWG) 2003 response criteria with complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), CR with incomplete blood count recovery(CRi), and partial response (PR). CR: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1.0×10^9/L, platelets ≥100×10^9/L, independence from RBC and platelet transfusions, no or <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow(BM). CRp: ANC >1.0×10^9/L, Platelets <100×10^9/L, independence from RBC transfusions, no or <5% myeloblasts in BM. CRi: ANC <1.0×10^9/L, no or <5% myeloblasts in BM. PR: ANC >1.0×10^9/L, Platelets ≥100×10^9/L, no or decrease of ≥50% in myeloblasts to 5-25% in BM.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 23 months)
Dose Escalation Phase: Response Rate in MDS Participants
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 23 months)
Response rate for MDS participants was assessed by IWG 2006 Response Criteria with CR, PR, marrow complete response(mCR) and HI. CR: normal peripheral counts with persistent granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L; normal BM with persistent marrow blasts ≤5%; persistent dysplasia. PR: Normal peripheral counts with granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L and normal BM with blasts >5% but reduced by 50% or more. mCR: reduction of BM blasts to ≤5% without normalization of peripheral counts.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 23 months)
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Phase- r/r AML, TN AML: Duration of Response
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Duration of response (in number of days) was calculated from the first time a complete response (CR, CRp, or CRi) was observed to time of relapse defined as the earliest time point whereby BM blasts or peripheral blood blasts become ≥5% and stayed at that level in subsequent visits while participants were still on study. CR:normal peripheral counts with persistent granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L and normal bone marrow (BM) with persistent marrow blasts ≤5%; persistent dysplasia was noted. CRp as per AML response criteria is defined as peripheral blood ANC ≥1.0×10^9/L, Platelets <100×10^9/L, independence from RBC transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRi as per AML response criteria is defined as peripheral blood ANC <1.0×10^9/L, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Dose Escalation Phase: Hematologic Improvement Rate in MDS
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
DE Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Duration of Response
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
DOR was calculated from first time a response category (CR, PR, mCR, or HI) was achieved until response category was no longer met or the last available time point, whichever occurred first. CR:normal peripheral counts with persistent granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L and normal bone marrow (BM) with persistent marrow blasts ≤5%; persistent dysplasia was noted. PR:normal peripheral counts with granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L and platelet count ≥100 ×10^9/L and normal BM with marrow blasts >5% but were reduced by 50% or more. mCR:reduction of BM blasts to ≤5% without normalization of peripheral counts. HI is divided as erythroid response(HI-E): hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL or RBC transfusion independence, platelet response (HI-P): absolute increase of platelet count from <20 to >20×10^9/L by at least 100%,/if more than 20×10^9/L, by absolute increase of 30×10^9/L, neutrophil response (HI-N): granulocyte increase ≥100%, by an absolute increase ≥0.5×10^9/L.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
Dose Escalation r/r AML, TN AML: Time to Response
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Time to response was defined as the number of days from the day a participants received the first dose of guadecitabine (cycle 1 day 1 {C1D1}) to the first day of response. Composite complete response rate (CRc = CR + CRp + CRi), which is an overall complete response assessment including CR, CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). CRc rate, was defined as the number of participants who achieved a response status of CR, CRp, or CRi divided by the total number of participants included in the efficacy dataset. The CR rate is defined as the number of participants whose best response is CR divided by the total number of participants included in the efficacy dataset.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Dose Expansion Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Time to Response
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
Time to response was defined as the number of days from the day a participants received the first dose of guadecitabine (C1D1) to the first day of response. CR:normal peripheral counts with persistent granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L and normal bone marrow (BM) with persistent marrow blasts ≤5%; persistent dysplasia was noted. PR:normal peripheral counts with granulocyte count ≥1.0×10^9/L and platelet count ≥100 ×10^9/L and normal BM with marrow blasts >5% but were reduced by 50% or more. mCR:reduction of BM blasts to ≤5% without normalization of peripheral counts. HI is divided as erythroid response(HI-E): hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL or RBC transfusion independence, platelet response (HI-P): absolute increase of platelet count from <20 to >20×10^9/L by at least 100%,/if more than 20×10^9/L, by absolute increase of 30×10^9/L, neutrophil response (HI-N): granulocyte increase ≥100%, by an absolute increase ≥0.5×10^9/L.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) Assessed Per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
DLT was defined using CTCAE v4.0. Toxicities were considered related to SGI-110 if it cannot be explained by underlying disease, intercurrent illness or concomitant medications. Any related Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except Grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting that is controllable by anti-emetics or diarrhea controllable by optimal therapy. Grade 3 laboratory investigations other than serum creatinine, bilirubin, AST or ALT were not considered a DLT unless they are associated with clinical manifestations. Study-drug related Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and Febrile neutropenia that was not present at study entry, and not resolve within 7 days, and is not related to underlying disease. Prolonged myelosuppression or pancytopenia with hypocellular bone marrow and no marrow blasts lasting for 6 weeks or more that is not related to disease progression. Any toxicity that results in treatment delays of > 4 weeks. Data is reported for any AE occurring during Cycle 1 (each cycle = 28 days).
Cycle 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Phases- r/r AML, TN AML, r/r MDS, TN MDS: Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up 30 days post treatment (up to approximately 46 months)
Treatment-emergent AEs are defined as events that first occurred or worsened after the first dose of study drug given on C1D1 until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or the start of an alternative anti-cancer treatment for MDS/CMML and subsequent AML, whichever occurs first, with the following exceptions: events that occurred after 30 days beyond the last dose of study treatment or the start of an alternative anti-cancer treatment for MDS/CMML and subsequent AML was considered treatment-emergent if the events are both serious and related to the study treatment.
From first dose of study drug up 30 days post treatment (up to approximately 46 months)
Dose Escalation and DE Phases- r/r AML, TN AML, r/r MDS, TN MDS: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up 30 days post treatment (up to approximately 46 months)
From first dose of study drug up 30 days post treatment (up to approximately 46 months)
Dose Escalation: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax ) of SGI-110 and Decitabine
Time Frame: Days 1, 5 and 8
Days 1, 5 and 8
Dose Escalation: Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin)
Time Frame: Days 5 and 8
Days 5 and 8
Dose Escalation: Area Under the Curve to Infinity (AUC0-inf)
Time Frame: Days 1, 5 and 8
Days 1, 5 and 8
Dose Escalation and DE Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Time to AML or Death
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Time to AML or death was defined as the number of days from the date the subject received the first dose of guadecitabine (C1D1) to the date of death or the date of MDS/ chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) progression to AML, whichever occurred earlier. Time to AML or death was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the time censored on the last date of contact if a participant was still alive without progression to AML.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 38 months)
Dose Escalation and DE Phases- r/r AML, TN AML, r/r MDS, TN MDS: Overall Survival
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
OS was defined as the number of days from the day the participant received the first dose of guadecitabine to the date of death (regardless of cause).
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
Dose Escalation: Number of Participants Achieving Blood and Platelet Transfusions
Time Frame: Cycle 1, Day 1 through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 46 months)
Cycle 1, Day 1 through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 46 months)
DE Phase- r/r AML, TN AML: Percentage of Participants With Cr, CRp and PR
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
CR is defined absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1.0×109/L, Platelets ≥100×109/L, independence from RBC and platelet transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRp is defined ANC >1.0×10^9/L, Platelets <100×10^9/L, independence from RBC transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRi is defined as ANC <1.0×10^9/L, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. PR is defined as ANC >1.0×10^9/L, Platelets ≥100×10^9/L, no myeloblasts and Decrease of ≥50% in myeloblasts to level of 5% to 25% in bone marrow.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
DE Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, mCR and HI
Time Frame: At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
CR is defined ANC >1.0×109/L, Platelets ≥100×109/L, independence from RBC and platelet transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRp is defined ANC >1.0×10^9/L, Platelets <100×10^9/L, independence from RBC transfusions over the past week, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. CRi is defined as ANC <1.0×10^9/L, no myeloblasts and <5% myeloblasts in bone marrow. PR is defined as ANC >1.0×10^9/L, Platelets ≥100×10^9/L, no myeloblasts and Decrease of ≥50% in myeloblasts to level of 5% to 25% in bone marrow.
At end of each Cycle of 28 days (Up to approximately 45 months)
DE Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Number of Participants Achieving Blood Transfusion Independence for 8 or 16-weeks
Time Frame: Weeks 8 and 16
Transfusion dependence at baseline was defined as any transfusion within 4 weeks of the first study dose (C1D1) with C1D1 transfusion counted, assuming it was always done before dosing. Transfusion independence after treatment was defined as no transfusion within an 8-week or 16-week period between C1D1 and last treatment date + 30 days.
Weeks 8 and 16
DE Phase- r/r MDS, TN MDS: Number of Participants Achieving Platelet Transfusion Independence for 8 or 16-weeks
Time Frame: Weeks 8 and 16
Transfusion dependence at baseline was defined as any transfusion within 4 weeks of the first study dose (C1D1) with C1D1 transfusion counted, assuming it was always done before dosing. Transfusion independence after treatment was defined as no transfusion within an 8-week or 16-week period between C1D1 and last treatment date + 30 days.
Weeks 8 and 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

December 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on AML

Clinical Trials on Guadecitabine

Subscribe