- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01275495
Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Stroke Caregivers (TASKII)
March 30, 2015 updated by: Indiana University
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of the revised Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II) compared with an Information, Support, and Referral (ISR) intervention in family caregivers of stroke survivors.
We will also test if TASK II intervention effects on primary outcomes (depressive symptoms, caregiving-related negative life changes, unhealthy days) are mediated through effects on secondary outcomes (task difficulty, optimism, threat appraisal).
Comparative costs and outcomes for the TASK II and ISR interventions will also be explored.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Stroke is the number one cause of disability in the United States, and over 4 million stroke survivors are alive today.
Many stroke survivors need the help of a family caregiver.
A family caregiver is a family member or close friend who helps the stroke survivor once they go home.
Many caregivers need information and support during the first few months after the stroke survivor is discharged home.
One group of caregivers will receive the TASK II intervention and another group of caregivers will receive existing educational materials about stroke and caregiving through an information, support, and referral (ISR) process.
Both groups of caregivers will receive written materials about stroke and caregiving by mail and weekly telephone calls by a nurse for a total of 8 weeks, with an additional call at 12 weeks.
A research assistant will also call by telephone at the beginning of the study, and at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the beginning of the study, with a follow-up call at 1 year to interview both groups of caregivers about their caregiving activities and about their own health and well-being.
If shown to be efficacious, our next goal will be to translate the TASK II intervention into practice settings to meet current recommendations and guidelines that emphasize follow up care for stroke survivors and their family caregivers.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
254
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University School of Nursing
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary caregiver (unpaid family member or significant other) of a stroke survivor
- No more than 8 weeks after survivor discharged home
- Plans to be providing care for 1 year or longer
- Access to a telephone
- Willingness to participate in 9 calls from a nurse and 5 data collection interviews at designated study time points
Exclusion Criteria:
- Caregiver or survivor age < 21 years
- Caregiver denies that survivor has had a stroke
- Caregiver does not consider him or herself a caregiver, stating that the survivor is not impaired or is the same as before the stroke
- Caregiver has low task difficulty (OCBS task difficulty score < 16)
- Caregiver communication difficulties (e.g., hearing loss)
- Caregiver not fluent in the English language
- Caregiver 6-item MMSE score less than 4
- Survivor residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility
- Survivor or caregiver has a terminal illness (e.g., cancer, end of life condition with decreased life expectancy, renal failure requiring dialysis)
- Survivor or caregiver history of hospitalization for alcohol or drug abuse
- Survivor or caregiver history of severe mental illness (e.g., Alzheimer's, dementia, suicidal tendencies, severe untreated depression or manic depressive disorder, schizophrenia)
- Survivor or caregiver pregnancy
- Survivor or caregiver is a prisoner or on house arrest
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II)
The TASK II group will fill out a checklist about their needs and concerns, and will receive written tip sheets by mail that address the needs and concerns that they feel are most important.
A nurse will call by telephone (lasting about 30 minutes or less) once a week for a total of 8 weeks, with another call at 12 weeks, to provide more information, answer questions, and to discuss more written tip sheets based on the caregiver's needs and concerns.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Information, Support, and Referral (ISR)
The ISR group will receive existing educational materials about stroke and caregiving developed by the American Stroke Association and weekly telephone calls by a nurse (lasting about 30 minutes or less) for a total of 8 weeks, with another call at 12 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Depressive symptoms: Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Among caregivers who screen positive for depressive symptoms at baseline, those randomized to the TASK II intervention will have a greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared to those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates.
Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
|
Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to 8 weeks
|
|
Caregiving-related negative life changes: Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)
Time Frame: Change in caregiving-related negative life changes from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in caregiving-related negative life changes compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates.
Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
|
Change in caregiving-related negative life changes from baseline to 8 weeks
|
|
Unhealthy days: Unhealthy Days (UD)
Time Frame: Change in unhealthy days from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in unhealthy days compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates.
Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
|
Change in unhealthy days from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Task difficulty: Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale Difficulty Subscale (OCBS)
Time Frame: Change in task difficulty from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in task difficulty compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates.
Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
|
Change in task difficulty from baseline to 8 weeks
|
|
Optimism: Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R)
Time Frame: Change in optimism from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater increase in optimism compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates.
Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
|
Change in optimism from baseline to 8 weeks
|
|
Threat appraisal: Appraisal of Caregiving Threat Subscale (ACS)
Time Frame: Change in threat appraisal from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in threat appraisal compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates.
Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
|
Change in threat appraisal from baseline to 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Crocker TF, Brown L, Lam N, Wray F, Knapp P, Forster A. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):CD001919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub4.
- Bakas T, Li Y, Habermann B, McLennon SM, Weaver MT. Developing a cost template for a nurse-led stroke caregiver intervention program. Clin Nurse Spec. 2011 Jan-Feb;25(1):41-6. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e318203cb92.
- Bakas T, Farran CJ, Austin JK, Given BA, Johnson EA, Williams LS. Stroke caregiver outcomes from the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK). Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):105-21. doi: 10.1310/tsr1602-105.
- Bakas T, Farran CJ, Austin JK, Given BA, Johnson EA, Williams LS. Content validity and satisfaction with a stroke caregiver intervention program. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01282.x.
- Bakas T, Austin JK, Habermann B, Jessup NM, McLennon SM, Mitchell PH, Morrison G, Yang Z, Stump TE, Weaver MT. Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit for Stroke Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3478-87. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011099. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
- McLennon SM, Hancock RD, Redelman K, Scarton LJ, Riley E, Sweeney B, Habermann B, Jessup NM, Bakas T. Comparing treatment fidelity between study arms of a randomized controlled clinical trial for stroke family caregivers. Clin Rehabil. 2016 May;30(5):495-507. doi: 10.1177/0269215515585134. Epub 2015 May 7.
- Jessup NM, Bakas T, McLennon SM, Weaver MT. Are there gender, racial or relationship differences in caregiver task difficulty, depressive symptoms and life changes among stroke family caregivers? Brain Inj. 2015;29(1):17-24. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947631. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
- McLennon SM, Bakas T, Jessup NM, Habermann B, Weaver MT. Task difficulty and life changes among stroke family caregivers: relationship to depressive symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.028. Epub 2014 May 22.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 11, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
January 12, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 31, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 30, 2015
Last Verified
March 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1003-63
- R01NR010388 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
Clinical Trials on Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II)
-
University of CincinnatiNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Completed
-
University of CincinnatiNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Active, not recruitingStroke | Family CaregiversUnited States
-
Çağtay MadenCompletedPhysical Activity | Cognitive Skill | Dual Task | Problematic Video GamingTurkey
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalTerminatedHelicobacter InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
GOG FoundationNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCervical Adenocarcinoma | Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IIIB Cervical Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IB Cervical...United States, Canada, Saudi Arabia, China, Singapore