- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01381159
Motivational Intervention for Asthma (MI-ACT)
March 14, 2022 updated by: Simon Bacon, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Motivational Intervention for Asthma Control Trial
The high burden of asthma appears to be related to poor asthma control, which is associated with more frequent asthma symptoms, greater bronchodilator use and functional impairment, and worse pulmonary function.
Despite the availability of effective treatments, more than 58% of asthmatics are poorly controlled.
Daily adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens is considered by experts to be one of the most important behavioural factors linked to achieving optimal asthma control.
However, there is a paucity of research on interventions specifically designed to improve ICS adherence among adult asthmatics.
The vast majority of intervention studies to date used atheoretical interventions to target behaviour change, relying mainly upon educational approaches which have been criticised for "failing to translate knowledge into action."
This may be due to the fact that most education-based approaches do not specifically address or help patients overcome ambivalence about behaviour change, which is necessary for ensuring daily adherence.
Motivational communication (MC) is a client-centred intervention that focuses on enhancing intrinsic motivation to change a particular behaviour, and exploring and resolving ambivalence about behaviour change.
Brief MC sessions (e.g., 1-5 x 15-30 minute sessions) have been shown to improve a variety of health behaviours (e.g., reduce alcohol consumption, improve dietary habits, increase exercise behaviour, and improve medication adherence) and health outcomes (reduce blood pressure, body mass index, and cholesterol levels).
However, no studies to date have assessed the efficacy of using MC to improve ICS adherence in asthmatics.
This study aims to assess the efficacy of using MC to improve daily medication (ICS) adherence in a sample of poorly controlled, non-adherent asthmatics.
It is hypothesized that patients randomized to the MC condition will exhibit significantly improved ICS adherence at 6 and 12-months post-intervention, independent of baseline levels and covariates, relative to patients randomized to the usual care control condition.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: The high burden of asthma, which affects 300 million people worldwide, appears to be related to poor asthma control, which is associated with more frequent asthma symptoms, greater bronchodilator use and functional impairment, and worse pulmonary function.
The availability of effective treatments suggests that asthma can be well controlled in most patients.
However, Canadian statistics reveal that over 58% of asthmatics are poorly controlled.
Achieving optimal asthma control relies upon several behavioral factors, including minimizing exposure to known triggers (e.g., pets, dust, pollen) and improving health behaviors (e.g,.
quitting smoking and adhering to medication).
Of these, daily adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens is considered by experts to be one of the most important behavioral factors linked to achieving optimal asthma control.
This is because taking ICS medications as prescribed (i.e., good adherence) has been shown to be effective for achieving good asthma control even in patients who fail to adequately manage/minimize exposure to known triggers (e.g., indoor allergens, exercise).
Despite the efficacy of ICS's, recent trends in adherence behaviour suggest that asthmatics are not adherent to these medications, with rates being as low as 32%, even in patients with severe asthma.
Explanations range from simply forgetting to having distorted/ erroneous illness and medication beliefs.
Currently, there is a paucity of research on interventions specifically designed to improve ICS adherence among adult asthmatics.
Most previous work has been conducted in pediatric samples which have yielded inconsistent results that are difficult to generalize to adult samples.
Of the studies conducted among adults, most suffer from important methodological limitations (e.g., small sample sizes, no intent to treat analyses, failure to control for contact time, no objective measure of adherence) that make it difficult to either generalize findings or interpret them with confidence.
Most importantly, the vast majority of intervention studies to date used atheoretical interventions to target behaviour change, relying mainly upon educational approaches which have been criticised for "failing to translate knowledge into action."
This may be due to the fact that most education-based approaches do not specifically address or help patients overcome ambivalence about behaviour change, which is necessary for ensuring daily adherence.
Motivational communication (MC) is a client-centred intervention that focuses on enhancing intrinsic motivation to change a particular behaviour (i.e., take medication as prescribed), and exploring and resolving ambivalence about behaviour change.
Brief MC sessions (e.g., 1-5 x 15-30 minute sessions) have been shown to improve a variety of health behaviours (e.g., reduce alcohol consumption, improve dietary habits, increase exercise behaviour, and improve medication adherence) and health outcomes (reduce blood pressure, body mass index, and cholesterol levels).
No studies to date have assessed the efficacy of using MC to improve ICS adherence in asthmatics.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to conduct a single site RCT to assess the efficacy of using MC to improve daily medication (ICS) adherence in a sample of poorly controlled, non-adherent asthmatics.
A brief (3-5 x 15-30 minute sessions), manualized MC intervention was developed by our laboratory using pilot funding.
This intervention is empirically-driven and uses established behavioural and motivational strategies to encourage change.
Methods: 182 poorly controlled, non-adherent adult asthmatics will be recruited from the outpatient asthma clinic of Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal (HSCM).
Patients will be screened on the day of their asthma clinic visit to verify eligibility.
Eligible patients consenting to have their medical and pharmacy records verified by the research team and who are identified as both having poorly controlled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≥1.25) and being non-adherent to ICS medication (filled < 50% of their ICS medication in the last year) will be invited to participate in the study.
Patients will undergo baseline assessments (pulmonary function, asthma control, self-efficacy, and quality of life) and will then be randomly assigned to a usual care + MC or usual care comparison group.
This trial has been designed to conform to the CONSORT guidelines.
The primary outcome measure will be ICS adherence at 12 months post-intervention, with preliminary analyses conducted at 6-months post-intervention.
Adherence will be measured according to the following validated equation: # of treatment days (based on the # of canisters filled at the pharmacy x the duration of each prescription) divided by the # of prescription days (# of days the patient is expected to be taking his/her medication).
Data will be obtained by accessing the patient's pharmacy records and drug insurance databases (i.e., RAMQ, reMed).
Secondary outcomes include self-reported medication adherence, adherence motivation, stage of change, pulmonary function, asthma control, self-efficacy, and quality of life scores 6 & 12 months post-intervention.
Impact: This will be the first appropriately designed RCT to test the impact of a brief, manualized MC intervention on asthma medication (ICS) adherence that may be easily incorporated into existing education programs and/or clinical practice and may significantly improve asthma outcomes.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
58
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J 1C5
- Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients 18 years and older
- Primary diagnosis of moderate-severe persistent asthma (as per GINA)
- Prescribed inhaled corticosteroid medication (min dose of 250 µg fluticasone equivalent per day) for at least 12 consecutive months
- Uncontrolled asthma (≥ 1.25 on the Asthma Control Questionnaire)
- Covered by a drug insurance plan (e.g., RAMQ)
- Non-adherent to ICS medication (based on having filled less than 50% of their prescriptions over the last year)
- Able to speak English or French.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any other medical condition that confers greater illness morbidity than asthma (e.g., active cancer)
- Severe psychopathology (e.g., schizophrenia)
- Apparent cognitive or language deficit
- Are or plan to become pregnant or move outside of Quebec over the course of the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Motivational Communication
Up to 3 x 30 minute brief MC sessions within 4-6 week period
|
Brief MC sessions focused on medication adherence within 4-6 week period
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
Usual care
|
Standard medical care
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Inhaled corticosteroid adherence
Time Frame: 12 months post-intervention
|
Inhaled corticosteroid adherence measured according to the following validated equation: # of treatment days (based on the # of canisters filled at the pharmacy x the duration of each prescription) divided by the # of prescription days (# of days the patient is expected to be taking his/her medication)
|
12 months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Inhaled corticosteroid adherence
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
|
Inhaled corticosteroid adherence measured according to the following validated equation: # of treatment days (based on the # of canisters filled at the pharmacy x the duration of each prescription) divided by the # of prescription days (# of days the patient is expected to be taking his/her medication)
|
6 months post-intervention
|
|
Asthma Control Questionnaire (Juniper)
Time Frame: 12 months post-intervention
|
Self report measure of asthma symptoms
|
12 months post-intervention
|
|
Asthma Control Test
Time Frame: 12 months post-intervention
|
Self report measures of asthma symptoms
|
12 months post-intervention
|
|
Asthma Self-Efficacy Scale (Tobin)
Time Frame: 12 months post-intervention
|
Self report measure of asthma self-efficacy, i.e., perceived ability to deal with asthma
|
12 months post-intervention
|
|
Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Juniper)
Time Frame: 12 months post-intervention
|
Self report measure of how asthma influences quality of life
|
12 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Simon L Bacon, PhD, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2019
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
August 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 23, 2011
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 27, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
March 15, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 14, 2022
Last Verified
March 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MBMC002
- MOP 111123 (OTHER_GRANT: Canadian Institutes of Health Research)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Asthma
-
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCSRecruitingAsthma in Children | Asthma Acute | Asthma Crisis | Asthma ChildhoodItaly
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterThe Dalia and Eli Hurvitz Foundation GrantNot yet recruitingAsthma Attack | Asthma AcuteIsrael
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)RecruitingAsthma Exacerbation | Childhood Asthma | Air Pollution, Risk Reduction Behaviors | Asthma ControlUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterWithdrawnAsthma in Children | Asthma Attack | Asthma Acute | Acute Asthma Exacerbation | Asthma; StatusUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompletedAsthma in Children | Asthma Attack | Asthma Acute | Asthma ChronicUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingAcute Asthma | Pediatric Asthma | Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation | BiPAPUnited States
-
SingHealth PolyclinicsRecruitingAsthma | Asthma in Children | Asthma Attack | Asthma Acute | Asthma ChronicSingapore
-
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Not yet recruitingPersistent Asthma | Asthma (Diagnosis) | Moderate Asthma ExacerbationUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Motivational Communication
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedDrug Abuse | Adolescent BehaviorHong Kong
-
Oslo University HospitalHelse Sor-OstActive, not recruiting
-
Artvin Coruh UniversityCompleted
-
Ankara UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth Communication | Professional CompetenceTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University Health Network, TorontoSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia; Nova Scotia... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic DiseaseCanada
-
Ginger YangUniversity of Iowa; Ohio State University; University of NebraskaRecruitingCommunication | Recidivism | Drive | Feedback, PsychologicalUnited States
-
Swansea UniversityCompletedControl Condition | Positive Communication (Primary) | Negative CommunicationUnited Kingdom
-
John Paul II University in Biała PodlaskaCompleted
-
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger...HRSA/Maternal and Child Health BureauCompleted
-
St. Jude Children's Research HospitalNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingCancer | CommunicationUnited States