Blood Glucose Stability and Variability on Two Diets

September 27, 2011 updated by: Nutrisystem, Inc.

A Comparison of Glycemic Stability and Variability During Consumption of Usual Diet or a Commercially Available Portion-controlled Diet Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

This investigation will examine the effects of consuming a structured, portion-controlled, low-glycemic index diet (commercially available as the Nutrisystem-D program) on several indicators of glycemic stability and variability among participants with type 2 diabetes. Results on the portion-controlled diet will be compared with those on participants' usual diets in a randomized cross-over trial. The investigators expect that participants will exhibit greater glycemic stability (e.g., more time in euglycemic range) and less glycemic variability (e.g., smaller mean amplitude of glycemic excursions) while consuming the Nutrisystem D program, as compared with their usual diet.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will investigate glycemic stability and variability in response to two diets: usual diet and a commercially available portion-controlled diet. The commercially available diet will be the Nutrisystem-D program, which consists of pre-packaged meals and snacks that are supplemented with grocery items, including fruits, vegetables, and dairy items. This trial will be a randomized cross-over trial of 15 patients with type 2 diabetes (weight stable for at least 3 months prior and medication stable throughout the trial). Participants will consume each diet for a 2-week period. During each diet period, participants will wear a blinded (i.e., providing no feedback) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device to assess glycemic stability and variability, and will be instructed to keep a detailed record of food and beverage intake and physical activity. The two diet/assessment periods will be separated by a 1-week washout period during which no dietary instruction will be given and no outcomes will be measured. Laboratory values (HbA1c, glucose, insulin, lipid panel) and physical measures (height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure) will be assessed at the baseline for descriptive purposes.

Primary Hypothesis: A significantly greater percentage of CGM readings will fall in the euglycemic range (71-180 mg/dl) during consumption of the Nutrisystem-D program, as compared with Usual Diet.

Secondary Hypothesis: Participants will have significantly smaller areas under the curve, mean amplitude of glycemic excurisions, mean, standard deviation, and interquartile range of glucose values, and a smaller of percentage of values in the hypo- (</= 70 mg/dl) and hyperglycemic (>180 mg/dl) ranges during consumption of the Nutrisystem-D program, as compared with Usual Diet.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 190104
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pennsylvania Center for Weight and Eating Disorders
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas A Wadden, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marion L Vetter, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 27 to 45 kg/m2
  • Capacity to provide written informed consent
  • Willing and committed to return for all clinic visits and complete all study-related procedures
  • Men and women of all racial and ethnic groups are eligible for participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of hypoglycemic medications (e.g., sulfonylureas, insulin)
  • Food allergies or intolerances that would render adherence to the test diets unpleasant or unsafe
  • Use of anticoagulant medications (e.g., warfarin)
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • More than a 5% weight gain or loss within the last 3 months
  • More than one alcoholic drink per day
  • Binge eating disorder
  • Regular use of acetaminophen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Commercial diet
Commercially available diet program (i.e., Nutrisystem D) that includes pre-packaged low-glycemic index portion-controlled entrees and snacks that are supplemented with grocery items in accordance with a structured meal plan.
During this diet period, participants will consume portion-controlled products from the Nutrisystem-D program for three entrees and one (women) or two (men) snacks per day. These pre-packaged portion-controlled items will be supplemented with grocery additions (fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy items) to provide approximately 1300 (women) to 1500 (men) calories per day. The Nutrisystem-D program (i.e., provided foods plus grocery additions) provides approximately 53% of calories from carbohydrate, 22% of calories from fat (6% from saturated fat and 0% from trans fat), and 25% of calories from protein. Women and men on the program consume approximately 1800 and 2000 mg/d, respectively, of sodium, and 31 and 35 g/d, respectively, of fiber.
Other Names:
  • Nutrisystem D
No Intervention: Usual Diet
Participants' usual consumption of food and beverages.
During the usual diet period, participants will not be given any specific instructions about what they should or should not consume. Instead, they will be told to "Eat how you would normally eat if you were not in this study."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of time in euglycemic range
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Euglycemia will be defined as a CGM reading in the range of 71-180 mg/dl, inclusive. Percent of time in the euglycemic range each day is automatically generated by the software accompanying the CGM device. Daily values will be averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods (i.e. during consumption of Usual Diet or Nutrisystem-D program).
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUC
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Area under the curve (AUC) for glucose will be calculated (using the trapezoidal method) for each day of monitoring and averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods.
2 weeks
MAGE
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions(MAGE) will be calculated (using methods described by Service et al.) for each day of monitoring and averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods
2 weeks
Mean glucose
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Daily values for mean blood glucose will be automatically generated by the software that accompanies the CGM device. These daily values will be averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods.
2 weeks
SD of glucose values
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The daily standard deviation (SD) of blood glucose values will be automatically generated by the software that accompanies the CGM device. These daily values will be averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods.
2 weeks
IQR of blood glucose
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The daily interquartile range(IQR) of blood glucose values will be automatically generated by the software that accompanies the CGM device. These daily values will be averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods.
2 weeks
Percent of time in hypoglycemic range
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Daily values for percent of time in the hypoglycemic range (< 70 mg/dl) will be automatically generated by the software that accompanies the CGM device. Daily values will be averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods.
2 weeks
Percent of time in hyperglycemic range
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Daily values for percent of time in the hyperlycemic range (>/= 180 mg/dl) will be automatically generated by the software that accompanies the CGM device. Daily values will be averaged over each of the 2-week assessment periods.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas A Wadden, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Portion-controlled diet

Subscribe