KU Alternate Meal Energy Level Study (KAMEL)

January 18, 2019 updated by: Debra K. Sullivan, PhD, RD, University of Kansas Medical Center
Compare intermittent versus continuous calorie restriction to learn more about these eating plans and determine whether they are useful and effective to lose weight and keep it off.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to provide evidence for the feasibility of an alternative weight control strategy by comparing two diets to see how intermittent calorie restriction compares to continuous or daily calorie restriction for weight loss in 35 adults with overweight or obesity. These diets will be incorporated into a comprehensive and intensive weight management program involving weekly health education meetings, regular diet and physical activity tracking, and feedback from a registered dietitian.

Each intervention includes 3 months of weight loss and 3 months of weight maintenance.

Group 1: Follow a low-calorie diet every day (1,200 - 1,500 calories daily)

Group 2: Follow an intermittent very-low calorie diet (500-800 calories). Participants in this group will alternate between days of 500-800 calories and days of structured eating using healthy eating principles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 21-65 years.
  2. BMI 25-35. Patients with a BMI less than 25 are not classified as overweight and individuals with a BMI >35 may require more aggressive weight management strategies.
  3. Clearance for participation from their PCP.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in a research project or formal program involving weight loss or exercise in the previous 6 mos., as these proximal experiences may impact the results of this study.
  2. Participation in a regular exercise program (i.e., > 500 kcal/wk. of planned activity as estimated by questionnaire [34].
  3. Not weight stable (-/+ 5%) for 6 mos. prior to intake. This will be determined by phone screen and self-report on the health history questionnaire
  4. Unwilling to be randomized to one of two diet strategies for weight loss.
  5. Pregnant during the previous 6 mos., lactating, or planned pregnancy in the following 6 mos.
  6. Serious medical risk (e.g. diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease) as determined by the individual's physician via the clearance to participate in the investigation.
  7. Disordered eating as determined by the Eating Attitudes Test using a score of 20 or greater [35]. This score indicates the need for counseling outside the scope of this study.
  8. Current treatment for psychological problems, or taking psychotropic medications. Addressing psychological problems is outside the scope of this study.
  9. Medications known to significantly influence weight.
  10. Adherence to specialized diet regimens (e.g., multiple food allergies, vegan, etc.)
  11. Do not have access to or independence over grocery shopping and meal preparation (i.e. those in military, college with cafeteria plan, etc.).
  12. If participants have recently undergone CT (Computed Tomography), PET, fluoroscopic, or nuclear medicine studies within the past year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Continuous Calorie Restriction
Daily calorie restriction: follow low-calorie diet (1,200-1,500 calories) daily using portion-controlled meals
Increase dietary structure using portion-controlled meals (PCM)
Restrict calorie intake daily
EXPERIMENTAL: Intermittent Very-Low Calorie Diet
Intermittent Restriction: follow very-low calorie diet (500-800) with portion-controlled meals three days per week and structured healthy eating on other days
Increase dietary structure using portion-controlled meals (PCM)
Severely restrict calorie intake intermittently
Other Names:
  • Intermittent Fasting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight (lbs, % change from baseline)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Change in absolute (lbs) and relative (%) weight from baseline to the end of the intervention (24 weeks)
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Body composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Change in absolute (g) and relative (%) fat mass and fat-free mass from baseline to 24 weeks
Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Program adherence
Time Frame: weekly through study completion (24 weeks)
Compliance to intervention protocol; adherence = (# attained / # expected)*100
weekly through study completion (24 weeks)
Nutrition-related quality of life
Time Frame: baseline, week 12, week 24
Assessed via questionnaire; higher scores indicate greater nutrition-related quality of life.
baseline, week 12, week 24
Dietary restraint
Time Frame: baseline, week 12, week 24
Assessed via three-factor eating questionnaire with three component scores for cognitive restraint, disinhibition, hunger)
baseline, week 12, week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 16, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB_STUDY00141322

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Portion-Controlled Meals

3
Subscribe