Web-based Support to Manage Arthritis Pain

December 7, 2012 updated by: Kimberlee Trudeau, Inflexxion, Inc.
Development of an interactive, online pain self-management program for adults who suffer from pain associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, and other arthritic conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis) using principles from Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1977). This online health intervention, painACTION: Arthritis, will provide clinically reliable information about diagnosis, treatment, and management of arthritis, written for health consumers in a clear and engaging manner to help increase their skills and confidence to use self-management strategies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One of every five adults in the United States (46.4 million people) is affected by arthritis. Increasing the number of days individuals are free of arthritis pain is one of the Healthy People 2010 objectives. Although there are a variety of medical treatments and medications available, self-management is a critical component in helping arthritis sufferers learn how to identify, avoid, and help manage their pain. Unfortunately, clinicians face significant time pressure, leaving little time for desired patient-provider education and collaboration. This is an important omission as tailored advice (e.g., specific exercises to reduce pain) from health providers could enable behavior change and improve outcomes. Therefore, widely accessible and tailored interventions that address motivational issues are needed to facilitate self-management education among arthritis patients. Because of its reach across demographic groups, the Internet is an excellent vehicle for offering a self-management program to arthritis sufferers. The investigators propose to develop an interactive, online pain self-management program for adults who suffer from pain associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, and other arthritic conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis) using principles from Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1977). This online health intervention, painACTION: Arthritis, will provide clinically reliable information about diagnosis, treatment, and management of arthritis, written for health consumers in a clear and engaging manner to help increase their skills and confidence to use self-management strategies. Moreover, it will be designed to complement and connect to our other SBIR-supported pain online health interventions (chronic back pain, migraine pain, neuropathic pain) to be a more comprehensive resource for those seeking pain management assistance. The most unique aspect of painACTION: Arthritis is that it includes three technological innovations -- a Web 2.0-enabled platform, a Custom Recommendation Engine, and Dynamic Lessons - to help people self manage their arthritis pain. In Phase I the investigators accomplished two important objectives: 1) established the feasibility of painACTION: Arthritis as an intervention and a technical project and 2) generated preliminary plans for the content, design, and technical development of painACTION: Arthritis. In Phase II the investigators will produce the program and test its efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

228

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Newton, Massachusetts, United States, 02459
        • Inflexxion, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Be at least 18 years of age;
  2. Be able to provide informed consent
  3. Be able to read and speak English
  4. Have reliable Internet access and e-mail
  5. Have a self-reported doctor diagnosis of arthritis, limited to the following conditions - osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or other arthritis conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis)
  6. Have a self-reported pain level of 4 or more in the past week on the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (McCaffery & Beebe, 1993) because 4 indicates moderate or higher level of pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in another Inflexxion pain management study.
  2. Participation in an online research study related to arthritis in the past year
  3. Currently in pain from a recent injury
  4. Has been hospitalized for non-medical reasons related to emotional or mental health in the past year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: painACTION: Arthritis
Participants will be asked to complete eight 20-minute sessions on the site over a four-week intervention period (two site visits per week), and complete five 20-minute "booster" sessions (one site visit per month) during the follow up period. Each session will have a minimum set of requirements. Specific details about the requirements for each session will be provided in the session logs.
NO_INTERVENTION: treatment as usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cognitions from baseline to: post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Time Frame: baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention

Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (Lorig et al., 1989) is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's ability to determine self-efficacy.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan et al., 1995) was developed to assess three components of catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The scale consists of 13 items rated from 0-4 (0 = not at all, 4 = all the time).

Pain Awareness Questionnaire (Berman et al., 2009) is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's awareness of their current pain.

baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention
Change in self management behaviors from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

Exercise Behaviors (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing the total time a patient had participated in various forms of exercise (e.g., stretching).

Cognitive Symptom Management (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing a patient's ability to manage their symptoms. This scale is rated on a 0 to 5 scale: 0 = never to 5 = always.

Communication with Physicians (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 3-item scale assessing a patient's communication with their physicians. This scale is rated on a 0 to 5 scale: 0 = never to 5 = always.

baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Change in pain and functioning from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) (Cleeland, 1991) uses a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale to obtain information on the intensity of pain, the degree to which pain interferes with function, pain relief, pain quality, and the patient's perception of the cause of pain (6 items).
baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Time Frame: baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention

The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-2-SF (Guillemin et al., 1997) is a 26-item scale that measures 5-domains of health status (e.g., physical, role, work, and social functioning.) Six additional items from the Ankylosing Spondylitis-AIMS will be added for additional validity of spine and mobility functioning for the participants with AS (Guillemin et al., 1999).

Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (Guy, 1976) is an outcome measure of global improvement with treatment and consists of a single-item self-rating.

baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention
Change in affect from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21, Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995). The DASS is a 21-item questionnaire that distinguishes symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress.
baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberlee J Trudeau, Ph.D., Inflexxion, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 10, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on painACTION: Arthritis

Subscribe