Tailored Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Recommended Dose of Prasugrel (ANTARCTIC)

January 10, 2017 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

The ANTARCTIC Study - Assessment of a Normal Versus Tailored Dose of Prasugrel After Stenting in Patients Aged > 75 Years to Reduce the Composite of Bleeding, Stent Thrombosis and Ischemic Complications

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of a strategy of platelet monitoring (Monitoring Arm) with down-adjustment of the dose of prasugrel in high responders and up-adjustment of the dose of prasugrel in low responders as compared to a more conventional strategy of a fixed dose of 5 mg to every patient without monitoring (Conventional Arm) as measured by a reduction in the composite endpoint of, cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) , stroke, stent thrombosis (ARC definition type "definite"), urgent revascularisation or bleeding (BARC definition type 2, 3 or 5).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of a strategy of platelet monitoring (Monitoring Arm) with down-adjustment of the dose of prasugrel in high responders and up-adjustment of the dose of prasugrel in low responders as compared to a more conventional strategy of a fixed dose of 5 mg to every patient without monitoring (Conventional Arm).Rationale: Prasugrel 10 mg is superior to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, reducing significantly the rates of ischemic events. Elderly patients appear to be at higher risk of bleeding events and pharmacokinetic data suggests that elderly patients are exposed to a higher concentration of the active metabolite of prasugrel. A reduced dose of 5 mg of prasugrel is therefore proposed to these patients to limit the risk of bleeding. On the other hand, the elderly have also a higher ischemic risk and higher levels of platelet aggregation under treatment than younger patients and may deserve stronger protection from antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing appears to be of particular interest in patients at high risk of both ischemic and bleeding events like the elderly. Too intense platelet inhibition may expose the elderly patients to an excessive bleeding risk. Too low platelet inhibition may expose them to recurrent cardiovascular ischemic events. The possibility of bedside monitoring of oral antiplatelet therapy offers the opportunity of tailoring prasugrel therapy in elderly patients to optimize their risk/benefit ratio. Such strategy has never been evaluated in a randomized and adequately powered study. Population: Acute coronary syndrome (STEMI and NSTEMI) treated by PCI-stent (bare metal stent or drug eluting stent) in patients aged 75 ≥ year. Methods: Monitoring with VerifyNow P2Y12, 2 weeks after initiation of 5 mg of maintenance dose of prasugrel, reduction of antiplatelet therapy if there is high on-treatment platelet inhibition (HPI) or increase in dosing if there is high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR). Patients will be monitored again 2 weeks later, only if they do not meet the Verifynow P2Y12 targets at the first assessment. Primary endpoint net clinical benefit at 12 months:Composite of Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent revascularisation, stent thrombosis and bleedings according to the BARC definitions (type 2, 3 or 5) Centers: Approximately 40 French high volume PCI centers

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

880

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nimes, France, 30029
        • CHU Caremeau à Nimes - Service de Cardiologie
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • ACTION study group - Institut de Cardiologie- Hôpital la Pitié Salpêtrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome (STEMI and NSTEMI) treated by PCI
  • Stent (bare metal stent or drug eluting stent) regardless of the regime of thienopyridines administered before randomisation
  • Age ≥ 75 years.
  • Aspirin dose of 75 mg will be recommended but study authorizes doses ranging from 75-160 mg
  • Ability to understand and to comply with the study protocol.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack, or sub-arachnoids haemorrhage
  • Have received fibrinolytic therapy within 48 hours of entry or randomisation into the study
  • Are receiving vitamin K antagonist
  • Concomitant medical illness (terminal malignancy) that is associated with reduced survival over the expected study treatment period.
  • History of intolerance or allergy to ASA or approved thienopyridines (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, or prasugrel)
  • Have active pathological bleeding or history of bleeding diathesis
  • Thrombocytopenia < 100 000 µL
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh class C).
  • Have a condition associated with poor treatment compliance, including dementia or mental illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1: Monitoring Arm
Monitoring Arm: dose adjustment of prasugrel with down-adjustment of the dose of prasugrel in high responders and up-adjustment of the dose of prasugrel in low responders
Monitoring with VerifyNow P2Y12, 2 weeks after initiation of 5 mg of maintenance dose of prasugrel, reduction of antiplatelet therapy if there is high on-treatment platelet inhibition (HPI) or increase in dosing if there is high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) Device: VerifyNow point of care assay VerifyNow (ACCUMETRICS San Diego USA)
Monitoring with VerifyNow P2Y12, 2 weeks after initiation of 5 mg of maintenance dose of prasugrel, reduction of antiplatelet therapy if there is high on-treatment platelet inhibition (HPI) or increase in dosing if there is high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) Device: VerifyNow point of care assay VerifyNow (ACCUMETRICS San Diego USA)
Active Comparator: 2: Conventional Arm
Conventional Arm: fixed dose of prasugrel 5 mg
fixed dose of prasugrel 5 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent revascularisation, stent thrombosis and bleedings according to the BARC definitions (type 2, 3 or 5) through 12 months of randomisation
Time Frame: through 12 months of randomisation
Composite of Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent revascularisation, stent thrombosis and bleedings according to the BARC definitions (type 2, 3 or 5) through 12 months of randomisation
through 12 months of randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the benefice of prasugrel adjustment on the composite ischemic endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, definite stent thrombosis and Urgent revascularisation through 12 months of randomisation
Time Frame: through 12 months of randomisation
The key secondary objective is to evaluate the benefice of prasugrel adjustment on the composite ischemic endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, definite stent thrombosis and Urgent revascularisation through 12 months of randomisation
through 12 months of randomisation
CV death, MI, stroke through 12 months of randomisation
Time Frame: through 12 months of randomisation
through 12 months of randomisation
CV death, MI, stroke or Urgent Revascularization through 12 months of randomisation
Time Frame: through 12 months of randomisation
through 12 months of randomisation
CV death: any death
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
Any death or resuscitated cardiac death
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
CV death or MI
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
Definite stent thrombosis (ARC definition)
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
All types of bleeding according to the BARC definitions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
BARC Bleeding of type 2, 3 or 5
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
Bleeding TIMI major through 12 months of randomisation
Time Frame: through 12 months of randomisation
through 12 months of randomisation
GUSTO severe or moderate bleeding
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
STEEPLE bleeding definitions (major, minor or both)
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
ISTH bleeding definitions (major and clinically relevant non major)
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
Bleeding TIMI minor
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
Bleeding TIMI minimal
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization
Bleeding TIMI major, minor and combination
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
12 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gilles MONTALESCOT, MD,PhD, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Modification of Prasugrel based on a biological assay

Subscribe