- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01544179
A Study of IRESSA Treatment Beyond Progression in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone (IMPRESS)
September 24, 2020 updated by: AstraZeneca
A Phase III Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Continuing IRESSA 250 mg in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients Who Have Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Have Progressed on First Line IRESSA
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in patients who have progressed on first line gefitinib, comparing continuing gefitinib in addition to cisplatin plus pemetrexed combination chemotherapy versus cisplatin plus pemetrexed combination chemotherapy alone.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A Phase III Randomised, Double blind, Placebo controlled, Parallel, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of continuing IRESSA 250 mg in addition to Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy alone in Patients who have Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Positive Locally advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and have progressed on First Line IRESSA.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
265
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100020
- Research Site
-
Beijing, China, 100021
- Research Site
-
Beijing, China, 100071
- Research Site
-
Beijing, China, 100730
- Research Site
-
Beijing, China, 100853
- Research Site
-
Beijing, China, 101149
- Research Site
-
Changchun, China, 130012
- Research Site
-
Changchun, China, 130021
- Research Site
-
Chengdu, China, 610041
- Research Site
-
Chengdu, China, 610042
- Research Site
-
Dalian, China, 116011
- Research Site
-
Guangzhou, China, 510120
- Research Site
-
Guangzhou, China, 510000
- Research Site
-
Hangzhou, China, 310003
- Research Site
-
Kunming, China, 650118
- Research Site
-
Nanjing, China, 210002
- Research Site
-
Shanghai, China, 200032
- Research Site
-
Shanghai, China, 200030
- Research Site
-
Shenyang, China, 110001
- Research Site
-
Shijiazhuang, China, 050011
- Research Site
-
Suzhou, China, 215004
- Research Site
-
Taiyuan, China, 030000
- Research Site
-
Wuhan, China, 430022
- Research Site
-
Xi'an, China, 710061
- Research Site
-
Ürümqi, China, 830000
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Clermont Ferrand, France, 63003
- Research Site
-
Lille, France, 59037
- Research Site
-
Lyon, France, 69373
- Research Site
-
Paris, France, 75020
- Research Site
-
Villejuif, France, 94805
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Hamburg, Germany, 21075
- Research Site
-
Löwenstein, Germany, 74245
- Research Site
-
Würzburg, Germany, 97067
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Research Site
-
Shatin, Hong Kong
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1121
- Research Site
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1145
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Genova, Italy, 16100
- Research Site
-
Parma, Italy, 43126
- Research Site
-
Perugia, Italy, 06132
- Research Site
-
Pisa, Italy, 56124
- Research Site
-
Roma, Italy, 00128
- Research Site
-
Roma, Italy, 00144
- Research Site
-
Rozzano, Italy, 20089
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Fukuoka-shi, Japan, 811-1395
- Research Site
-
Kashiwa, Japan, 277-8577
- Research Site
-
Osakasayama, Japan, 589-8511
- Research Site
-
Sakai-shi, Japan, 591-8555
- Research Site
-
Sunto-gun, Japan, 411-8777
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
- Research Site
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08003
- Research Site
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08025
- Research Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Research Site
-
Majadahonda, Spain, 28222
- Research Site
-
Málaga, Spain, 29010
- Research Site
-
Sevilla, Spain, 41009
- Research Site
-
Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
- Research Site
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients aged 18 years or older (For Japan only- male or female patients aged 20 years or older)
- Cytological or histological confirmation of NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology with an activating EGFR TK mutation as determined locally
- Patients with documented 'acquired resistance' on first line gefitinib
- Patients suitable to start cisplatin based pemetrexed combination chemotherapy.
- Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior chemotherapy or other systemic anti-cancer treatment (excluding gefitinib). Palliative bone radiotherapy must be completed at least 2 weeks before start of study treatment with no persistent radiation toxicity).
- Past medical history of interstitial lung disease, drug-induced interstitial disease, radiation pneumonitis which required steroid treatment or any evidence of clinically active interstitial lung disease
- Other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within the last 5 years, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or cervical cancer in situ or completely resected intramucosal gastric cancer
- Any evidence of severe of uncontrolled systemic disease Treatment with an investigational drug within 4 weeks before randomization
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Gefitinib
Gefitinib and cisplatin plus pemetrexed combination chemotherapy
|
Investigational Drug
Chemotherapy (concomitant therapy)
Chemotherapy (concomitant therapy)
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo and cisplatin plus pemetrexed combination chemotherapy.
|
Chemotherapy (concomitant therapy)
Chemotherapy (concomitant therapy)
Matching placebo as comparator
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Progression-Free Survival (Site Read, Investigator Assessment)
Time Frame: Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis, assessed up to 50 weeks
|
PFS is the time from randomisation until the date of objective disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression).
Progression is defined using RECIST (v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm.
|
Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis, assessed up to 50 weeks
|
Median Progression-Free Survival (Site Read, Investigator Assessment)
Time Frame: Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis, assessed up to 50 weeks
|
PFS is the time from randomisation until the date of objective disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression).
Progression is defined using RECIST (v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm.
|
Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis, assessed up to 50 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Following progression survival data was collected every 8 weeks until documentation of death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up or the final data cut-off, whichever occurs first.
|
OS is the time from the date of randomisation until death due to any cause.
Any subject not known to have died at the time of analysis will be censored based on the last recorded date on which the subject was known to be alive.
|
Following progression survival data was collected every 8 weeks until documentation of death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up or the final data cut-off, whichever occurs first.
|
Median Overall Survival (OS) at Time of PFS Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline and then every 6 weeks after randomization until objective disease progression. OS is then assessed 8 weekly following PFS progression up to PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Baseline and then every 6 weeks after randomization until objective disease progression. OS is then assessed 8 weekly following PFS progression up to PFS analysis data cut off.
|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Site Read Data)
Time Frame: Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis.
|
ORR rate is defined as the number (%) of subjects with at least one visit response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) , as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI.
CR, Disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Data obtained up until progression, or last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, was included in the assessment of ORR.
|
Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis.
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis.
|
DCR is the percentage of patients who achieve disease control at 6 weeks following randomisation.
DCR is defined as a Best Objective Response (BOR) of Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI.
CR, Disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR not sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD); PD, ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and the sum must have shown an absolute increase of ≥5mm
|
Radiologic evaluations were carried out every 6 weeks from randomization until documented progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow up, death or the primary data cut off (DCO) for the analysis.
|
Improvement in Trial Outcome Index
Time Frame: At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
An improvement is defined as a change from baseline of ≥ +6 (0-84 score range).
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) questionnaire.
|
At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Time to Worsening in Trial Outcome Index
Time Frame: At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
A worsening is defined as a change from baseline of ≤ -6 (0-84 score range).
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) questionnaire
|
At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Improvement in FACT-L Total Score
Time Frame: At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
An improvement is defined as a change from baseline of ≥ +6 (0-136 score range).
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) questionnaire
|
At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Time to Worsening in FACT-L Total Score
Time Frame: At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
A worsening is defined as a change from baseline of ≤ -6 (0-136 score range).
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) questionnaire
|
At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Improvement in Lung Cancer Subscale
Time Frame: At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
An improvement is defined as a change from baseline of ≥ +2 (0-28 score range).
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) questionnaire
|
At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Time to Worsening in Lung Cancer Subscale
Time Frame: At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
A worsening is defined as a change from baseline of ≤ -2 (0-28 score range).
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) questionnaire
|
At visits 2-8, then every 6 weeks until progression, at progression or treatment discontinuation, and every 8 weeks after progression until PFS analysis data cut off.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Yuri Rukazenkov, MD PhD, GCL Oncology, AstraZeneca Global R&D, Alderley park, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, UK
- Principal Investigator: Tony Mok, M.D., Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., Hong KongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
- Principal Investigator: Jean-Charles Soria, MD, PHD, Institute Gustave Roussy, France
- Study Director: Haiyi Jiang, M.D. MSc, Zhangjiang Hi-tech Park, 3F, Room 3102, 199 Liangjing Road, Pudong Shanghai, postal code:201203
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 15, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 5, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
November 20, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
March 5, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 25, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 24, 2020
Last Verified
September 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Lung Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Folic Acid Antagonists
- Gefitinib
- Pemetrexed
Other Study ID Numbers
- D791LC00001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Healthy, no Evidence of Disease | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Alexander ChiNot yet recruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Carcinoma | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIChina
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerCanada
-
Karen KellyBristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); TransgeneCompletedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAstraZenecaRecruitingNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | PD-L1 Gene Mutation | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIA | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Gefitinib
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityUnknown
-
Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.UnknownNon-small-cell Lung CancerChina
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityWu Jieping Medical FoundationCompletedNon-small Cell Lung CancerChina
-
Jiangsu Famous Medical Technology Co., Ltd.UnknownNon-small Cell Lung Cancer
-
AstraZenecaCompletedNeoplasms, Squamous CellUnited States, Czech Republic, Poland, Germany, Belgium, Taiwan, India, Serbia
-
Anhui Medical UniversityUnknownSelf Efficacy | Drug ToxicityChina
-
NCIC Clinical Trials GroupCompletedProstate CancerCanada
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Samsung Medical CenterUnknownNon-small Cell Lung CancerKorea, Republic of
-
Gynecologic Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedOvarian Cancer | Primary Peritoneal Cavity CancerUnited States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia