Comparison Between Anterior and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

June 13, 2013 updated by: Sorlandet Hospital HF

Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Prospective Randomized Trial

In total hip arthroplasty several approaches can be used. The newly introduced minimally invasive anterior approach is supposed to cause less damage to tendons and muscles. At the same time there are reports that there are more complications when this approach is used. The direct lateral approach is the most used in Norway and is well documented. There are however those who postulate that there is to high risk of damage to the gluteus medius causing Trendelenburg gait. In the investigators hospital both the anterior and direct lateral approach is used with good result. The investigators main study hypothesis is that there is no difference between the use of anterior or direct lateral approach i total hip arthroplasty in regards to postoperative function and pain, complications, radiological finds (X-ray and MRI), markers for muscle damage (i.e CK-total) or other clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arendal, Norway
        • Sorlandet Hospital HF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical and radiological diagnosis of coxarthrosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery on affected hip
  • No mental disability preventing follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Direct lateral approach
Patient operated using direct lateral approach.
The use of direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty
Other Names:
  • Hardinge approach
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Anterior approach
Patient operated using anterior approach.
The use of anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty
Other Names:
  • Smith-Petersen approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in function
Time Frame: 2 years
Function of the operated hip will be evaluated after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months using Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score and 6-minute-walk-test. Improvement in general health will be evaluated by using Eq-5D.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle damage
Time Frame: Day of operation and next four consecutive days
CK-total is measured direct postoperativly and for the next four consequtive days. CRP is measured the first four postoperative days.
Day of operation and next four consecutive days
Pain
Time Frame: First four postoperative days
Pain using Visual Analog Scale and the use of analgetics (converted to opioid equivalent doses) are recorded.
First four postoperative days
X-ray assessment
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Placement of the acetabular component (inclination and version) and femoral stem (varus/valgus) and migration.
3 and 12 months
MRI
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
A subselection of about 40 patients will undergo MRI-scans preoperatively and after 3 and 12 months to assess tendon- and muscledamage.
3 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Svein Andreas Svenningsen, M.D, Ph.D, Sorlandet Hospital HF

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2013

Last Verified

June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coxarthrosis

Clinical Trials on Direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty

Subscribe