Comparison of Continuous Non-invasive Pressure Device Versus Invasive Pressure Measurement During Prehospital Emergency

June 22, 2012 updated by: Robert Hanss

Evaluation of a Continuous Non-invasive Arterial Pressure Device in Comparison With Invasive Pressure Measurement During Out-of-hospital Emergency

The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of continuous non-invasive AP monitoring (CNAP) compared to simultaneous IBP measurement in intensive care patients undergoing a transport in the ambulance car.

Since CNAP finger blood pressure is calibrated to NBP level, a systematic bias between IBP and CNAP as described by a recent FDA meta analysis [ ] is expected. The most important factor of CNAP system performance is its ability to accurately track blood pressure changes. Thus, the purpose of this investigation is to show that the bias between CNAP and IBP falls within the expected range and that blood pressure alterations are detected instantaneously.

The endpoints of the study are:

  • The agreement of systolic, diastolic and mean CNAP and IBP readings determined on a beat-to-beat basis during:
  • Takeover of the patient on the intensive care unit,
  • Transport of the patient from the intensive care unit to the ambulance car
  • Transport of the patient in the ambulance car
  • The agreement of systolic, diastolic and mean CNAP and IBP blood pres-sure changes determined on a beat-to-beat basis during:
  • Takeover of the patient on the intensive care unit,
  • Transport of the patient from the intensive care unit to the ambulance car
  • Transport of the patient in the ambulance car

The beat-to-beat readings of CNAP and IBP will be automatically recorded electronically on a memory card in the transport monitor. CNAP data will additionally be recorded directly on the CNAP Monitor with a memory stick. Safety will be assessed by clinical observations as well as adverse events (AE) recording.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Arterial pressure (AP) is one of the most important physiological variables. Particularly in emergency medicine, AP needs to be monitored repeatedly or even better, continuously. This is usually done using an oscillometric pressure device (NIBP). A number of studies emphasise the importance of continuous AP monitoring as more than 20% of all hypotensive episodes may be missed by NIBP and another 20% are detected with delay. Prolonged hypotension precedes 56% of perioperative cardiac arrests and is associated with a significant increase of the 1-year mortality rate, indicating that NBP monitoring especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases might be insufficient independent from the clinical setting. Recently, a monitor for continuous non-invasive AP monitoring (CNAP™ Monitor 500) was introduced. It was shown that during procedures with high risk of hypotension NIBP missed significant more hypotensive episodes than CNAP. At the moment we have no evidence of the performance of CNAP in the preclinical emergency medicine. The evaluation against the gold standard of invasive pressure measurement in this study will help us to evaluate the performance of CNAP in the preclinical setting.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ICU Patients with established arterial pressure measurement

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients willing and capable of giving informed consent or with legal agents willing of giving informed consent
  • Patients undergoing a transport from the intensive care unit to another institution with the ambulance car
  • Patients where the IBP cannula was already placed on the intensive care unit
  • Patients where IBP cannula, and CNAP upper arm cuff can be placed on the same arm, and CNAP finger cuff can be placed on the contra-lateral arm
  • Intact perfusion of both arm evidenced by a negative Allen's test
  • Age 18 years and above
  • ASA I-IV
  • Weight >= 40 and <= 180 kg, BMI < 35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of neurological, neuromuscular seizure
  • Patients where IBP cannula cannot be placed in the radial artery
  • Patients with vascular implants at the sites of non-invasive blood pressure measurement (fingers and upper arm)
  • Patients with history of arrhythmias
  • Edematous patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort
Emergency Patients with applied arterial blood pressure measurement
Continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure recording
Other Names:
  • CNAP
  • Continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure recording

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
agreement with invasive blood pressure
Time Frame: 1 year
beat-to-beat readings of CNAP and IBP
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Hanss, PD Dr., UKSH-Campus Kiel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CNAP-ITW

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Pressure

Clinical Trials on CNAP-Monitor

Subscribe